Association Between β-Adrenoreceptor Agonists and Antagonists and Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Agnieszka Szmigiel, Miguel Monteiro da Rocha, Kate Browne, Daniel Morales, David Benee Olsen, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Ian Douglas, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Helena Carreira
{"title":"Association Between β-Adrenoreceptor Agonists and Antagonists and Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Agnieszka Szmigiel, Miguel Monteiro da Rocha, Kate Browne, Daniel Morales, David Benee Olsen, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Ian Douglas, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Helena Carreira","doi":"10.1002/pds.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>β-agonists and β-antagonists are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide. In 2018, studies suggesting a harmful association between propranolol and Parkinson's disease (PD) prompted a signal procedure by the European Medicines Agency's safety committee, which concluded with no update of product information. Several studies have been published since then. We aimed to systematically review, critically appraise, and meta-analyse all studies on the association between the use of β-antagonists (including propranolol) and β-agonists, and the risk of PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Embase and Medline up to December 2024 for observational and intervention studies that reported relative risk estimates of the association between use of these medicines and PD. Two reviewers screened the records, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The restricted maximum likelihood method was used to compute pooled effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies were eligible. Overall, 20 had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. Twelve studies had medium to high risk of outcome misclassification. Of the 14 studies concerning β-antagonists, eleven had an unclear or high risk of protopathic bias, as propranolol is indicated for the treatment of essential tremor. Control for confounding by socio-economic status, area of residence (urban/rural), and smoking (a protective factor against PD) was deficient or lacking in 9/22, 15/22, and 12/22 studies, respectively. Lag times were applied in 9/22 studies. In meta-analysis, the summary relative risk (RR) of PD was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.18-1.68) for the class of β-antagonists (12 studies) and 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for β2-agonists (11 studies). Among specific β-antagonists, the summary RR of PD was 2.36 (1.66-3.36) for propranolol (7 studies), 0.84 (0.80-0.88) for carvedilol (3 studies) and 1.02 (0.87-1.18) for metoprolol (4 studies). For specific β2-agonists, summary RR was 0.88 (0.77-1.01) for salbutamol (7 studies), 0.91 (0.88-0.95) for short-acting β2-agonists (6 studies), and 0.85 (0.76-0.96) for long-acting β2 agonists (5 studies). Restricting to subgroups based on quality criteria resulted in weaker or non-statistically significant associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality and quantity of the available evidence do not support a causal association between use of β-adrenoreceptor modulators and PD. Significant associations are most likely explained by protopathic bias and confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 4","pages":"e70140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: β-agonists and β-antagonists are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide. In 2018, studies suggesting a harmful association between propranolol and Parkinson's disease (PD) prompted a signal procedure by the European Medicines Agency's safety committee, which concluded with no update of product information. Several studies have been published since then. We aimed to systematically review, critically appraise, and meta-analyse all studies on the association between the use of β-antagonists (including propranolol) and β-agonists, and the risk of PD.

Methods: We searched Embase and Medline up to December 2024 for observational and intervention studies that reported relative risk estimates of the association between use of these medicines and PD. Two reviewers screened the records, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The restricted maximum likelihood method was used to compute pooled effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Twenty-two studies were eligible. Overall, 20 had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. Twelve studies had medium to high risk of outcome misclassification. Of the 14 studies concerning β-antagonists, eleven had an unclear or high risk of protopathic bias, as propranolol is indicated for the treatment of essential tremor. Control for confounding by socio-economic status, area of residence (urban/rural), and smoking (a protective factor against PD) was deficient or lacking in 9/22, 15/22, and 12/22 studies, respectively. Lag times were applied in 9/22 studies. In meta-analysis, the summary relative risk (RR) of PD was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.18-1.68) for the class of β-antagonists (12 studies) and 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for β2-agonists (11 studies). Among specific β-antagonists, the summary RR of PD was 2.36 (1.66-3.36) for propranolol (7 studies), 0.84 (0.80-0.88) for carvedilol (3 studies) and 1.02 (0.87-1.18) for metoprolol (4 studies). For specific β2-agonists, summary RR was 0.88 (0.77-1.01) for salbutamol (7 studies), 0.91 (0.88-0.95) for short-acting β2-agonists (6 studies), and 0.85 (0.76-0.96) for long-acting β2 agonists (5 studies). Restricting to subgroups based on quality criteria resulted in weaker or non-statistically significant associations.

Conclusion: The quality and quantity of the available evidence do not support a causal association between use of β-adrenoreceptor modulators and PD. Significant associations are most likely explained by protopathic bias and confounding.

β-肾上腺素受体激动剂和拮抗剂与帕金森病的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:β激动剂和β拮抗剂是世界范围内处方最多的药物之一。2018年,研究表明心得安与帕金森病(PD)之间存在有害关联,促使欧洲药品管理局安全委员会采取了信号程序,但没有更新产品信息。从那时起,已经发表了几项研究。我们的目的是系统地回顾、批判性地评估和荟萃分析所有关于β-拮抗剂(包括心得安)和β-激动剂的使用与PD风险之间关系的研究。方法:我们检索了Embase和Medline截至2024年12月的观察性和干预性研究,这些研究报告了使用这些药物与PD之间相关的相对风险估计。两名审稿人筛选记录、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用限制最大似然法计算合并效应估计和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:22项研究符合条件。总的来说,20个研究至少在一个领域存在高偏倚风险。12项研究存在中至高风险的结果错误分类。在关于β-拮抗剂的14项研究中,有11项具有不明确或高风险的原发性偏倚,因为普萘洛尔用于治疗特发性震颤。在9/22、15/22和12/22研究中,社会经济地位、居住地区(城市/农村)和吸烟(PD的保护因素)的混杂控制分别不足或缺乏。在9/22项研究中应用了滞后时间。在荟萃分析中,β-拮抗剂(12项研究)和β-激动剂(11项研究)的PD总相对危险度(RR)分别为1.41 (95% CI: 1.18-1.68)和0.93(0.84-1.03)。在特异性β拮抗剂中,心得安(7项研究)、卡维地洛(3项研究)和美托洛尔(4项研究)的PD总RR分别为2.36(1.66 ~ 3.36)、0.84(0.80 ~ 0.88)和1.02(0.87 ~ 1.18)。对于特异性β2激动剂,沙丁胺醇(7项研究)的总RR为0.88(0.77-1.01),短效β2激动剂(6项研究)的总RR为0.91(0.88-0.95),长效β2激动剂(5项研究)的总RR为0.85(0.76-0.96)。基于质量标准的亚组限制导致较弱或无统计学意义的关联。结论:现有证据的质量和数量不支持β-肾上腺素受体调节剂与PD之间的因果关系。显著的关联最有可能用原发偏倚和混淆来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信