Citizens' Options When Accessing and Sharing Health Information - An International Survey of IMIA Member Countries.

Yearbook of medical informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1800760
Camilla Hjermitslev, Helen Monkman, Julia Adler-Milstein, Thomas Schmidt, Christian Nøhr, Jeppe Eriksen
{"title":"Citizens' Options When Accessing and Sharing Health Information - An International Survey of IMIA Member Countries.","authors":"Camilla Hjermitslev, Helen Monkman, Julia Adler-Milstein, Thomas Schmidt, Christian Nøhr, Jeppe Eriksen","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1800760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Citizens' access to personal health information and information on prescription medication, options to share personal health data, and how these personal health data are kept secure, are all important themes in health informatics and therefore elaborated upon in this paper.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The empirical data stems from a survey that examines citizens' temporal access to laboratory test results, options for sharing patient-generated health data (PGHD) with health providers, methods to obtain supplementary information on prescription medication, and security issues pertaining to national standards, education, and experienced breaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results are based on answers from representatives in the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) member countries (n=28). Data shows that citizens' online access to test results is possible as soon as they are available in ten countries whereas nine countries have no norm or standard. The most common ways to provide citizens with supplementary information on prescription medication is through package inserts from manufacturers or paper medication information from pharmacies. PGHD is shared primarily in print or by showing the device to the health provider. Regarding e-health security, most countries have national standards for the security, however, less than half of the IMIA representatives answer that health professionals are required training in the national standards. Lastly, 16 of the 28 answers reply that there has been leaks leading to unauthorized access to health data. Future research should focus on how to provide citizens access to lab results according to their needs and examine how to include digital PGHD meaningfully into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":"292-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Citizens' access to personal health information and information on prescription medication, options to share personal health data, and how these personal health data are kept secure, are all important themes in health informatics and therefore elaborated upon in this paper.

Methods: The empirical data stems from a survey that examines citizens' temporal access to laboratory test results, options for sharing patient-generated health data (PGHD) with health providers, methods to obtain supplementary information on prescription medication, and security issues pertaining to national standards, education, and experienced breaches.

Results: Results are based on answers from representatives in the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) member countries (n=28). Data shows that citizens' online access to test results is possible as soon as they are available in ten countries whereas nine countries have no norm or standard. The most common ways to provide citizens with supplementary information on prescription medication is through package inserts from manufacturers or paper medication information from pharmacies. PGHD is shared primarily in print or by showing the device to the health provider. Regarding e-health security, most countries have national standards for the security, however, less than half of the IMIA representatives answer that health professionals are required training in the national standards. Lastly, 16 of the 28 answers reply that there has been leaks leading to unauthorized access to health data. Future research should focus on how to provide citizens access to lab results according to their needs and examine how to include digital PGHD meaningfully into clinical practice.

公民在获取和分享健康信息时的选择——对IMIA成员国的国际调查。
引言:公民对个人健康信息和处方药信息的获取,个人健康数据共享的选择,以及如何保护这些个人健康数据的安全,都是健康信息学中的重要主题,因此本文对此进行了阐述。方法:经验数据来自一项调查,该调查调查了公民对实验室检测结果的临时访问,与卫生服务提供者共享患者生成的健康数据(PGHD)的选择,获取处方药补充信息的方法,以及与国家标准、教育和经验漏洞有关的安全问题。结果:结果基于国际医学信息学协会(IMIA)成员国代表的回答(n=28)。数据显示,10个国家的公民一旦获得检测结果,就可以在线获取检测结果,而9个国家没有规范或标准。向公民提供处方药物补充信息的最常见方式是通过制造商的包装说明书或药店的纸质药物信息。PGHD主要通过打印或向医疗保健提供者展示设备的方式共享。关于电子卫生安全,大多数国家都有国家安全标准,然而,只有不到一半的国际信息管理局代表回答说,需要对卫生专业人员进行国家标准培训。最后,28个答复中有16个答复说,曾发生过导致未经授权访问卫生数据的泄露事件。未来的研究应侧重于如何根据公民的需要向他们提供实验室结果,并研究如何将数字PGHD有意义地纳入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信