Bridging the Gap: Challenges and Strategies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Clinical Practice.

Yearbook of medical informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1800729
Niels Peek, Daniel Capurro, Vlada Rozova, Sabine N van der Veer
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Challenges and Strategies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Niels Peek, Daniel Capurro, Vlada Rozova, Sabine N van der Veer","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1800729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the surge in development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to support clinical decision-making, few of these algorithms are used in practice. We reviewed recent literature on clinical deployment of AI-based clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS), and assessed the maturity of AI-CDSS implementation research. We also aimed to compare and contrast implementation of rule-based CDSS with implementation of AI-CDSS, and to give recommendations for future research in this area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Scopus for publications in 2022 and 2023 that focused on AI and/or CDSS, health care, and implementation research, and extracted: clinical setting; clinical task; translational research phase; study design; participants; implementation theory, model or framework used; and key findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected and described a total of 31 recent papers addressing implementation of AI-CDSS in clinical practice, categorised into four groups: (i) Implementation theories, frameworks, and models (4 papers); (ii) Stakeholder perspectives (22 papers); (iii) Implementation feasibility (three papers); and (iv) Technical infrastructure (2 papers). Stakeholders saw potential benefits of AI-CDSS, but emphasized the need for a strong evidence base and indicated that systems should fit into clinical workflows. There were clear similarities with rule-based CDSS, but also differences with respect to trust and transparency, knowledge, intellectual property, and regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The field of AI-CDSS implementation research is still in its infancy. It can be strengthened by grounding studies in established theories, models and frameworks from implementation science, focusing on the perspectives of stakeholder groups other than healthcare professionals, conducting more real-world implementation feasibility studies, and through development of reusable technical infrastructure that facilitates rapid deployment of AI-CDSS in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":"103-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the surge in development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to support clinical decision-making, few of these algorithms are used in practice. We reviewed recent literature on clinical deployment of AI-based clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS), and assessed the maturity of AI-CDSS implementation research. We also aimed to compare and contrast implementation of rule-based CDSS with implementation of AI-CDSS, and to give recommendations for future research in this area.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus for publications in 2022 and 2023 that focused on AI and/or CDSS, health care, and implementation research, and extracted: clinical setting; clinical task; translational research phase; study design; participants; implementation theory, model or framework used; and key findings.

Results: We selected and described a total of 31 recent papers addressing implementation of AI-CDSS in clinical practice, categorised into four groups: (i) Implementation theories, frameworks, and models (4 papers); (ii) Stakeholder perspectives (22 papers); (iii) Implementation feasibility (three papers); and (iv) Technical infrastructure (2 papers). Stakeholders saw potential benefits of AI-CDSS, but emphasized the need for a strong evidence base and indicated that systems should fit into clinical workflows. There were clear similarities with rule-based CDSS, but also differences with respect to trust and transparency, knowledge, intellectual property, and regulation.

Conclusions: The field of AI-CDSS implementation research is still in its infancy. It can be strengthened by grounding studies in established theories, models and frameworks from implementation science, focusing on the perspectives of stakeholder groups other than healthcare professionals, conducting more real-world implementation feasibility studies, and through development of reusable technical infrastructure that facilitates rapid deployment of AI-CDSS in clinical practice.

弥合差距:在临床实践中实施基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的挑战和策略。
目的:尽管人工智能(AI)算法支持临床决策的发展激增,但这些算法很少用于实践。我们回顾了最近关于基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统(AI-CDSS)的临床部署的文献,并评估了AI-CDSS实施研究的成熟度。我们还旨在比较和对比基于规则的CDSS的实施与AI-CDSS的实施,并为该领域的未来研究提出建议。方法:我们在PubMed和Scopus检索了2022年和2023年关于人工智能和/或CDSS、医疗保健和实施研究的出版物,并提取了:临床环境;临床任务;转化研究阶段;研究设计;参与者;使用的实施理论、模型或框架;以及主要发现。结果:我们选择并描述了最近31篇关于在临床实践中实施AI-CDSS的论文,分为四组:(i)实施理论、框架和模型(4篇论文);利益相关者观点(22篇论文);执行可行性(三份文件);(四)技术基础设施(2篇)。利益相关者看到了AI-CDSS的潜在好处,但强调需要强有力的证据基础,并指出系统应适合临床工作流程。与基于规则的CDSS有明显的相似之处,但在信任和透明度、知识、知识产权和监管方面也存在差异。结论:AI-CDSS实施领域的研究尚处于起步阶段。可以通过以下方式加强这方面的研究:基于实施科学的既定理论、模型和框架,关注医疗保健专业人员以外的利益相关者群体的观点,开展更多的实际实施可行性研究,以及开发可重复使用的技术基础设施,促进在临床实践中快速部署AI-CDSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信