Robbie M Martin, Elizabeth R Denison, Helena L Pound, Ellen A Barnes, Justin D Chaffin, Steven W Wilhelm
{"title":"Mitomycin C eliminates cyanobacterial transcription without detectable prophage induction in a <i>Microcystis</i>-dominated harmful algal bloom in Lake Erie.","authors":"Robbie M Martin, Elizabeth R Denison, Helena L Pound, Ellen A Barnes, Justin D Chaffin, Steven W Wilhelm","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02872-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although evidence indicates that viruses are important in the ecology of <i>Microcystis</i> spp., many questions remain. For example, how does <i>Microcystis</i> exist at high, bloom-associated cell concentrations in the presence of viruses that infect it? The phenomenon of lysogeny and associated homoimmunity offer possible explanations for this question. Virtually nothing is known about lysogeny in <i>Microcystis</i>, but a metatranscriptomic study suggests that widespread, transient lysogeny is active during blooms. These observations lead us to posit that lysogeny is important in modulating <i>Microcystis</i> blooms. Using a classic mitomycin C-based induction study, we tested for lysogeny in a <i>Microcystis</i>-dominated community in Lake Erie in 2019. Treated communities were incubated with 1 mg L<sup>-1</sup> mitomycin C for 48 h alongside unamended controls. We compared direct counts of virus-like particles (VLPs) and examined community transcription for active infection by cyanophage. Mitomycin C treatment did not increase VLP count. Mitomycin C effectively eliminated transcription in the cyanobacterial community, while we detected no evidence of induction. Metatranscriptomic analysis demonstrated that the standard protocol of 1 mg L<sup>-1</sup> was highly toxic to the cyanobacterial population, which likely inhibited induction of any prophage present. Follow-up lab studies indicated that 0.1 mg L<sup>-1</sup> may be more appropriate for use in freshwater cyanobacterial studies. These findings will guide future efforts to detect lysogeny in <i>Microcystis</i> blooms.IMPORTANCEHarmful algal blooms dominated by <i>Microcystis</i> spp. occur throughout the world's freshwater ecosystems, leading to detrimental effects on ecosystem services that are well documented. After decades of research, the scientific community continues to struggle to understand the ecology of <i>Microcystis</i> blooms. The phenomenon of lysogeny offers an attractive potential explanation for several ecological questions surrounding blooms. However, almost nothing is known about lysogeny in <i>Microcystis</i>. We attempted to investigate lysogeny in a <i>Microcystis</i> bloom in Lake Erie and found that the standard protocols used to study lysogeny in aquatic communities are inappropriate for use in <i>Microcystis</i> studies, and perhaps freshwater cyanobacterial studies more broadly. This work can be used to design better methods to study the viral ecology of <i>Microcystis</i> blooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0287224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02872-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although evidence indicates that viruses are important in the ecology of Microcystis spp., many questions remain. For example, how does Microcystis exist at high, bloom-associated cell concentrations in the presence of viruses that infect it? The phenomenon of lysogeny and associated homoimmunity offer possible explanations for this question. Virtually nothing is known about lysogeny in Microcystis, but a metatranscriptomic study suggests that widespread, transient lysogeny is active during blooms. These observations lead us to posit that lysogeny is important in modulating Microcystis blooms. Using a classic mitomycin C-based induction study, we tested for lysogeny in a Microcystis-dominated community in Lake Erie in 2019. Treated communities were incubated with 1 mg L-1 mitomycin C for 48 h alongside unamended controls. We compared direct counts of virus-like particles (VLPs) and examined community transcription for active infection by cyanophage. Mitomycin C treatment did not increase VLP count. Mitomycin C effectively eliminated transcription in the cyanobacterial community, while we detected no evidence of induction. Metatranscriptomic analysis demonstrated that the standard protocol of 1 mg L-1 was highly toxic to the cyanobacterial population, which likely inhibited induction of any prophage present. Follow-up lab studies indicated that 0.1 mg L-1 may be more appropriate for use in freshwater cyanobacterial studies. These findings will guide future efforts to detect lysogeny in Microcystis blooms.IMPORTANCEHarmful algal blooms dominated by Microcystis spp. occur throughout the world's freshwater ecosystems, leading to detrimental effects on ecosystem services that are well documented. After decades of research, the scientific community continues to struggle to understand the ecology of Microcystis blooms. The phenomenon of lysogeny offers an attractive potential explanation for several ecological questions surrounding blooms. However, almost nothing is known about lysogeny in Microcystis. We attempted to investigate lysogeny in a Microcystis bloom in Lake Erie and found that the standard protocols used to study lysogeny in aquatic communities are inappropriate for use in Microcystis studies, and perhaps freshwater cyanobacterial studies more broadly. This work can be used to design better methods to study the viral ecology of Microcystis blooms.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.