Zahra Mahmoudjafari, Danilo Di Maio, Jia Li, Katherine L Rosettie, Anthony Masaquel
{"title":"Glofitamab results in cost savings versus epcoritamab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a total cost of care analysis<sup>‡</sup>.","authors":"Zahra Mahmoudjafari, Danilo Di Maio, Jia Li, Katherine L Rosettie, Anthony Masaquel","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2486437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fixed-treatment duration glofitamab and treat-to-progression epcoritamab are approved in the US for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥2 prior therapies. An economic model was developed to estimate the per-patient total cost of care (TCC) for glofitamab versus epcoritamab from a US healthcare perspective. Treatment costs were based on time-to-off-treatment (glofitamab, NCT03075696) and progression-free survival (epcoritamab, NCT03625037). Per-patient cost savings, adjusted to 2023 US dollars, were observed with glofitamab versus epcoritamab across cycles 1-3 (-$56,275), and over 6 months (-$37,982), 1 year (-$68,195), 5 years (-$223,692), 10 years (-$325,175), and lifetime (-$503,075). While adverse event ($364) and treatment administration ($8,398) costs were higher for glofitamab versus epcoritamab, these were offset by consistently lower glofitamab treatment costs across all time horizons. Glofitamab showed per-patient TCC savings versus epcoritamab at every cumulative cycle and across all time horizons investigated, offering greater budget predictability and cost savings at the healthcare system and population levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2486437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fixed-treatment duration glofitamab and treat-to-progression epcoritamab are approved in the US for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥2 prior therapies. An economic model was developed to estimate the per-patient total cost of care (TCC) for glofitamab versus epcoritamab from a US healthcare perspective. Treatment costs were based on time-to-off-treatment (glofitamab, NCT03075696) and progression-free survival (epcoritamab, NCT03625037). Per-patient cost savings, adjusted to 2023 US dollars, were observed with glofitamab versus epcoritamab across cycles 1-3 (-$56,275), and over 6 months (-$37,982), 1 year (-$68,195), 5 years (-$223,692), 10 years (-$325,175), and lifetime (-$503,075). While adverse event ($364) and treatment administration ($8,398) costs were higher for glofitamab versus epcoritamab, these were offset by consistently lower glofitamab treatment costs across all time horizons. Glofitamab showed per-patient TCC savings versus epcoritamab at every cumulative cycle and across all time horizons investigated, offering greater budget predictability and cost savings at the healthcare system and population levels.
期刊介绍:
Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor