Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino PhD , Konstantin Baumann MD , Stephanie Gaengler PhD , Tatjana Meyer-Heim MD , Angélique Sadlon MD, PhD , Gregor Freystaetter MD , Reto W. Kressig MD , Andreas Egli MD , Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari MD, DrPH
{"title":"Polypharmacy and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: A 3-year Study of DO-HEALTH","authors":"Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino PhD , Konstantin Baumann MD , Stephanie Gaengler PhD , Tatjana Meyer-Heim MD , Angélique Sadlon MD, PhD , Gregor Freystaetter MD , Reto W. Kressig MD , Andreas Egli MD , Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari MD, DrPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the association between polypharmacy and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at baseline and over 3 years in community-dwelling older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Observational analysis of the DO-HEALTH trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Community-dwelling adults aged ≥70 years with good cognitive function and without major diseases at baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Main exposure was polypharmacy at baseline (≥5 medications). The outcome was MCI (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score <26), assessed at baseline and years 1, 2, and 3. Logistic regression and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) for repeated binary outcomes were used for the cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, respectively. Minimally adjusted models included age, sex, prior fall, study site, body mass index, and education. Fully adjusted models additionally adjusted for mental health and multimorbidity. GEE models also accounted for time and DO-HEALTH treatment effects. Sensitivity analysis used a stricter MCI definition (MoCA < 24).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2153 participants completed MoCA at baseline. Baseline MCI prevalence was higher in participants with polypharmacy compared with those with no polypharmacy (MCI < 26: 53.5% vs 46.5%; MCI < 24: 34.9% vs 17.2%). Polypharmacy was associated with greater MCI odds at baseline in the minimally adjusted models (MoCA < 26: odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05–1.66; MoCA < 24: OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06–1.79). Over 3 years, polypharmacy was associated with increased MCI odds in the minimally adjusted models (MoCA < 26: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08–1.52; MoCA < 24: OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07–1.65). Notably, these associations were somewhat attenuated and nonsignificant after controlling for mental health and multimorbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Implications</h3><div>Our findings suggest that MCI is more prevalent in older adults with polypharmacy compared with those without polypharmacy. Although polypharmacy was associated with MCI at baseline and over 3 years, these associations were attenuated by mental health and multimorbidity, suggesting that mental health and multimorbidity contribute to both polypharmacy and MCI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 6","pages":"Article 105586"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025001033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To examine the association between polypharmacy and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at baseline and over 3 years in community-dwelling older adults.
Design
Observational analysis of the DO-HEALTH trial.
Setting and Participants
Community-dwelling adults aged ≥70 years with good cognitive function and without major diseases at baseline.
Methods
Main exposure was polypharmacy at baseline (≥5 medications). The outcome was MCI (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score <26), assessed at baseline and years 1, 2, and 3. Logistic regression and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) for repeated binary outcomes were used for the cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, respectively. Minimally adjusted models included age, sex, prior fall, study site, body mass index, and education. Fully adjusted models additionally adjusted for mental health and multimorbidity. GEE models also accounted for time and DO-HEALTH treatment effects. Sensitivity analysis used a stricter MCI definition (MoCA < 24).
Results
A total of 2153 participants completed MoCA at baseline. Baseline MCI prevalence was higher in participants with polypharmacy compared with those with no polypharmacy (MCI < 26: 53.5% vs 46.5%; MCI < 24: 34.9% vs 17.2%). Polypharmacy was associated with greater MCI odds at baseline in the minimally adjusted models (MoCA < 26: odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05–1.66; MoCA < 24: OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06–1.79). Over 3 years, polypharmacy was associated with increased MCI odds in the minimally adjusted models (MoCA < 26: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08–1.52; MoCA < 24: OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07–1.65). Notably, these associations were somewhat attenuated and nonsignificant after controlling for mental health and multimorbidity.
Conclusion and Implications
Our findings suggest that MCI is more prevalent in older adults with polypharmacy compared with those without polypharmacy. Although polypharmacy was associated with MCI at baseline and over 3 years, these associations were attenuated by mental health and multimorbidity, suggesting that mental health and multimorbidity contribute to both polypharmacy and MCI.
期刊介绍:
JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates.
The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality