First-line treatment of osteoporosis with osteoanabolic therapy: a new opportunity.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jasna Aleksova, Peter Ebeling
{"title":"First-line treatment of osteoporosis with osteoanabolic therapy: a new opportunity.","authors":"Jasna Aleksova, Peter Ebeling","doi":"10.1111/imj.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteoporosis is a national health priority, and over six million Australians over the age of 50 years have poor bone health. Fragility fractures due to osteoporosis are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality risk and a high economic cost to the community. It is a chronic condition requiring long-term management. Despite notable advances in pharmacotherapy, large treatment gaps remain. Antiresorptive drugs have been the foundation of treatment; however, their efficacy wanes and rare adverse effects accumulate with prolonged use. Osteoanabolic drugs form new bone and can also restore deteriorated bone microarchitecture, in addition to increasing bone mineral density. Currently, antiresorptive drugs are used as first-line drugs for osteoporosis. However, recent studies have highlighted the superiority of anabolic drugs for fracture reduction over antiresorptives. Furthermore, for patients at very high risk or imminent risk of fracture, the use of sequential therapy with an osteoanabolic medication followed by an antiresorptive is superior to achieving optimal long-term bone health outcomes. This article will discuss the evidence supporting the anti-fracture benefits of osteoanabolic drugs, emphasising their benefits as first-line agents for osteoporosis. Challenges surrounding transitions between osteoanabolic and antiresorptive medications are also discussed, highlighting considerations for the optimal treatment sequence with a focus on recent updates to Australian prescribing recommendations and PBS requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a national health priority, and over six million Australians over the age of 50 years have poor bone health. Fragility fractures due to osteoporosis are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality risk and a high economic cost to the community. It is a chronic condition requiring long-term management. Despite notable advances in pharmacotherapy, large treatment gaps remain. Antiresorptive drugs have been the foundation of treatment; however, their efficacy wanes and rare adverse effects accumulate with prolonged use. Osteoanabolic drugs form new bone and can also restore deteriorated bone microarchitecture, in addition to increasing bone mineral density. Currently, antiresorptive drugs are used as first-line drugs for osteoporosis. However, recent studies have highlighted the superiority of anabolic drugs for fracture reduction over antiresorptives. Furthermore, for patients at very high risk or imminent risk of fracture, the use of sequential therapy with an osteoanabolic medication followed by an antiresorptive is superior to achieving optimal long-term bone health outcomes. This article will discuss the evidence supporting the anti-fracture benefits of osteoanabolic drugs, emphasising their benefits as first-line agents for osteoporosis. Challenges surrounding transitions between osteoanabolic and antiresorptive medications are also discussed, highlighting considerations for the optimal treatment sequence with a focus on recent updates to Australian prescribing recommendations and PBS requirements.

骨质疏松的一线治疗与骨合成代谢疗法:一个新的机会。
骨质疏松症是国家健康的优先事项,超过600万50岁以上的澳大利亚人骨骼健康状况不佳。骨质疏松引起的脆性骨折与发病率和死亡率的增加以及对社区的高经济成本有关。这是一种需要长期治疗的慢性疾病。尽管药物治疗取得了显著进展,但仍存在很大的治疗差距。抗吸收药物一直是治疗的基础;然而,随着长期使用,其疗效逐渐减弱,罕见的不良反应积累。骨合成代谢药物形成新骨,也可以恢复恶化的骨微结构,除了增加骨矿物质密度。目前,抗骨质吸收药物是治疗骨质疏松症的一线药物。然而,最近的研究强调了合成代谢药物在骨折复位方面优于抗吸收药物。此外,对于骨折风险非常高或即将发生骨折风险的患者,使用骨合成代谢药物和抗骨吸收药物的顺序治疗优于获得最佳的长期骨健康结果。本文将讨论支持骨合成代谢药物抗骨折益处的证据,强调它们作为骨质疏松症一线药物的益处。本文还讨论了在骨合成代谢和抗骨吸收药物之间转换的挑战,强调了最佳治疗顺序的考虑,重点是澳大利亚处方建议和PBS要求的最新更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信