The C-terminal regions of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors are not the key determinants of their differential arrestin recruitment but modulate the rate of receptor endocytosis.
{"title":"The C-terminal regions of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors are not the key determinants of their differential arrestin recruitment but modulate the rate of receptor endocytosis.","authors":"Bashaier Al-Zaid, Suleiman Al-Sabah","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1528295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism and mediate the incretin effect. This glucose-dependent potentiation of insulin secretion is severely impaired in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. While pharmacological doses of GLP-1 can overcome this impairment, the same is not true for GIP. The reasons for this are unclear. However, differences in the signalling profiles of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) may contribute. GLP-1R and GIPR are closely related G protein-coupled receptors but differ in their ability to recruit arrestin, GIPR being relatively poorer. Furthermore, these receptors have been reported to utilize different mechanisms to undergo agonist-induced internalization. <b>Methods:</b> This study aimed to identify the role of the C-terminal region of the two receptors in their differing signalling behaviour using chimeric receptors where the C-terminal tail of one receptor was replaced with that of the other. <b>Results:</b> Replacement of the C-terminal tail had only limited effects on G protein and arrestin recruitment to either receptor. GIP-stimulated internalisation of GIPR occurred at a significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.001) slower rate than GLP-1-stimulated internalisation of GLP-1R. Replacement of the C-terminal tail of GIPR with that of GLP-1R significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) increased the internalization rate but not to the rate of wild-type GLP-1R. The reciprocal substitution significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.005) decreased internalization rate. <b>Conclusion:</b> These data show that the C-terminal region of GLP-1R and GIPR is not the critical determinant of their differing ability to recruit arrestin but modulates receptor endocytosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1528295"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1528295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism and mediate the incretin effect. This glucose-dependent potentiation of insulin secretion is severely impaired in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. While pharmacological doses of GLP-1 can overcome this impairment, the same is not true for GIP. The reasons for this are unclear. However, differences in the signalling profiles of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) may contribute. GLP-1R and GIPR are closely related G protein-coupled receptors but differ in their ability to recruit arrestin, GIPR being relatively poorer. Furthermore, these receptors have been reported to utilize different mechanisms to undergo agonist-induced internalization. Methods: This study aimed to identify the role of the C-terminal region of the two receptors in their differing signalling behaviour using chimeric receptors where the C-terminal tail of one receptor was replaced with that of the other. Results: Replacement of the C-terminal tail had only limited effects on G protein and arrestin recruitment to either receptor. GIP-stimulated internalisation of GIPR occurred at a significantly (P < 0.001) slower rate than GLP-1-stimulated internalisation of GLP-1R. Replacement of the C-terminal tail of GIPR with that of GLP-1R significantly (P < 0.05) increased the internalization rate but not to the rate of wild-type GLP-1R. The reciprocal substitution significantly (P < 0.005) decreased internalization rate. Conclusion: These data show that the C-terminal region of GLP-1R and GIPR is not the critical determinant of their differing ability to recruit arrestin but modulates receptor endocytosis.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.