Blood toxicogenomics reveals potential biomarkers for management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Frontiers in Genetics Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgene.2025.1524433
Rachel J Church, Benedict Anchang, Brian D Bennett, Pierre R Bushel, Paul B Watkins
{"title":"Blood toxicogenomics reveals potential biomarkers for management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.","authors":"Rachel J Church, Benedict Anchang, Brian D Bennett, Pierre R Bushel, Paul B Watkins","doi":"10.3389/fgene.2025.1524433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Accurate diagnosis, assessment, and prognosis of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is problematic, in part due to the shortcomings of traditional blood biomarkers. Studies in rodents and healthy volunteers have supported that RNA transcript changes in whole blood may address some of these shortcomings. <b>Methods:</b> In this study, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis on peripheral blood samples collected from 55 patients with acute IDILI and 17 patients with liver injuries not attributed to IDILI. <b>Results and discussion:</b> Three differentially expressed genes (DEGs; <i>CFD</i>, <i>SQLE</i>, and <i>INKA1</i>) were identified as significantly associated with IDILI vs. other liver injuries. No DEGs were identified comparing IDILI patients to the 5 patients with autoimmune hepatitis, suggesting possible common underlying mechanisms. Two genes (<i>VMO1</i> and <i>EFNA1</i>) were significantly associated with hepatocellular injury compared to mixed/cholestatic injury. When patients with severe vs. milder IDILI were compared, we identified over 500 DEGs. The top pathways identified from these DEGs had in common down regulation of multiple T-cell specific genes. Further analyses confirmed that these changes could largely be accounted for by a fall in the concentration of circulating T-cells during severe DILI, perhaps due to exhaustion or sequestration of these cells in the liver. Exploration of DEGs specific for the individual causal agents was largely unsuccessful, but isoniazid-induced IDILI demonstrated 25 DEGs compared to other non-isoniazid IDILI cases. Finally, among the 14 IDILI patients that had hepatocellular jaundice (i.e., Hy's Law cases), we identified 39 DEGs between the 4 patients with fatal or liver transplantation outcomes compared to those that recovered. These findings suggest the potential for blood-based transcriptomic biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of IDILI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12750,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Genetics","volume":"16 ","pages":"1524433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1524433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate diagnosis, assessment, and prognosis of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is problematic, in part due to the shortcomings of traditional blood biomarkers. Studies in rodents and healthy volunteers have supported that RNA transcript changes in whole blood may address some of these shortcomings. Methods: In this study, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis on peripheral blood samples collected from 55 patients with acute IDILI and 17 patients with liver injuries not attributed to IDILI. Results and discussion: Three differentially expressed genes (DEGs; CFD, SQLE, and INKA1) were identified as significantly associated with IDILI vs. other liver injuries. No DEGs were identified comparing IDILI patients to the 5 patients with autoimmune hepatitis, suggesting possible common underlying mechanisms. Two genes (VMO1 and EFNA1) were significantly associated with hepatocellular injury compared to mixed/cholestatic injury. When patients with severe vs. milder IDILI were compared, we identified over 500 DEGs. The top pathways identified from these DEGs had in common down regulation of multiple T-cell specific genes. Further analyses confirmed that these changes could largely be accounted for by a fall in the concentration of circulating T-cells during severe DILI, perhaps due to exhaustion or sequestration of these cells in the liver. Exploration of DEGs specific for the individual causal agents was largely unsuccessful, but isoniazid-induced IDILI demonstrated 25 DEGs compared to other non-isoniazid IDILI cases. Finally, among the 14 IDILI patients that had hepatocellular jaundice (i.e., Hy's Law cases), we identified 39 DEGs between the 4 patients with fatal or liver transplantation outcomes compared to those that recovered. These findings suggest the potential for blood-based transcriptomic biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of IDILI.

血液毒性基因组学揭示了治疗特殊药物性肝损伤的潜在生物标志物。
特异性药物性肝损伤(IDILI)的准确诊断、评估和预后存在问题,部分原因在于传统血液生物标志物的不足。对啮齿动物和健康志愿者的研究支持全血中RNA转录的改变可能解决这些缺点。方法:在本研究中,我们对55例急性IDILI患者和17例非IDILI肝损伤患者的外周血样本进行了RNA-Seq分析。结果与讨论:三个差异表达基因(DEGs;与其他肝损伤相比,CFD、SQLE和INKA1)与IDILI显著相关。IDILI患者与5例自身免疫性肝炎患者未发现deg,提示可能存在共同的潜在机制。与混合/胆汁淤积性损伤相比,两个基因(VMO1和EFNA1)与肝细胞损伤显著相关。当比较重度和轻度IDILI患者时,我们发现超过500度。从这些deg中鉴定出的顶端通路具有多个t细胞特异性基因的共同下调。进一步的分析证实,这些变化在很大程度上可以解释为严重DILI期间循环t细胞浓度的下降,可能是由于这些细胞在肝脏中的耗尽或隔离。对单个致病因子特异性deg的探索在很大程度上是不成功的,但异烟肼诱导的IDILI与其他非异烟肼诱导的IDILI病例相比显示出25个deg。最后,在14例伴有肝细胞性黄疸的IDILI患者(即Hy's Law病例)中,我们发现4例死亡或肝移植结果的患者与恢复的患者相比有39例deg。这些发现表明,基于血液的转录组生物标志物可能有助于IDILI的诊断和预后分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Genetics
Frontiers in Genetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
3491
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Genetics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on genes and genomes relating to all the domains of life, from humans to plants to livestock and other model organisms. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of the world’s leading experts, this multidisciplinary, open-access journal is at the forefront of communicating cutting-edge research to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public. The study of inheritance and the impact of the genome on various biological processes is well documented. However, the majority of discoveries are still to come. A new era is seeing major developments in the function and variability of the genome, the use of genetic and genomic tools and the analysis of the genetic basis of various biological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信