Does management reasoning display context specificity? An exploration of sleep loss and other distracting situational (contextual) factors in clinical reasoning.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1515/dx-2025-0007
Amanda Sutton, Jacob Collen, Steven J Durning, Eulho Jung
{"title":"Does management reasoning display context specificity? An exploration of sleep loss and other distracting situational (contextual) factors in clinical reasoning.","authors":"Amanda Sutton, Jacob Collen, Steven J Durning, Eulho Jung","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Context specificity occurs when a health professional sees two patients with identical signs and symptoms yet arrives at two different diagnoses due to other existing factors. For example, one patient speaks English as a first language, while the other patient has limited English proficiency. It is not known if context specificity extends beyond diagnosis and also affects management reasoning. Our study explored whether reduced sleep and other distracting contextual factors (e.g., limited English proficiency) lead to context specificity, resulting in suboptimal management reasoning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen medical residents participated in a two-month study (consisting of one outpatient and one inpatient rotation), in which their sleep was tracked. After each rotation, participants watched two clinical encounter videos-one with and one without distracting contextual factors-and completed think-aloud interviews for each video discussing their management plans. Interviews were transcribed and assessed for management reasoning themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents (n=17) on outpatient rotations received more sleep than those on inpatient rotations (450.5 min ± 7.13 vs. 425.6 min ± 10.78, p=0.023). Five management reasoning themes were identified: organized knowledge, disorganized knowledge, uncertainty, addressing non-pharmacologic interventions, and addressing patient needs and concerns. There was essentially no difference in the prevalence of utterances of organized knowledge themes between residents with more or less sleep (25 vs. 27 times, p=0.78) or those exposed to contextual factors vs. not exposed (24 vs. 28 times, p=0.58). However, disorganized knowledge themes were observed significantly more frequently in participants exposed to contextual factors (33 vs. 18 times, p=0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents slept more during outpatient rotations. While sleep alone was not associated with the prevalence of management reasoning themes, residents exposed to videos with distracting contextual factors displayed significantly more instances of disorganized knowledge, supporting the phenomenon of context specificity in management reasoning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Context specificity occurs when a health professional sees two patients with identical signs and symptoms yet arrives at two different diagnoses due to other existing factors. For example, one patient speaks English as a first language, while the other patient has limited English proficiency. It is not known if context specificity extends beyond diagnosis and also affects management reasoning. Our study explored whether reduced sleep and other distracting contextual factors (e.g., limited English proficiency) lead to context specificity, resulting in suboptimal management reasoning.

Methods: Seventeen medical residents participated in a two-month study (consisting of one outpatient and one inpatient rotation), in which their sleep was tracked. After each rotation, participants watched two clinical encounter videos-one with and one without distracting contextual factors-and completed think-aloud interviews for each video discussing their management plans. Interviews were transcribed and assessed for management reasoning themes.

Results: Residents (n=17) on outpatient rotations received more sleep than those on inpatient rotations (450.5 min ± 7.13 vs. 425.6 min ± 10.78, p=0.023). Five management reasoning themes were identified: organized knowledge, disorganized knowledge, uncertainty, addressing non-pharmacologic interventions, and addressing patient needs and concerns. There was essentially no difference in the prevalence of utterances of organized knowledge themes between residents with more or less sleep (25 vs. 27 times, p=0.78) or those exposed to contextual factors vs. not exposed (24 vs. 28 times, p=0.58). However, disorganized knowledge themes were observed significantly more frequently in participants exposed to contextual factors (33 vs. 18 times, p=0.036).

Conclusions: Residents slept more during outpatient rotations. While sleep alone was not associated with the prevalence of management reasoning themes, residents exposed to videos with distracting contextual factors displayed significantly more instances of disorganized knowledge, supporting the phenomenon of context specificity in management reasoning.

管理推理是否显示上下文特异性?临床推理中睡眠缺失和其他分散注意力的情境(语境)因素的探索。
目的:当卫生专业人员看到两个具有相同体征和症状的患者,但由于其他现有因素而得出两种不同的诊断时,背景特异性就发生了。例如,一名患者以英语为第一语言,而另一名患者的英语水平有限。目前尚不清楚上下文特异性是否超出了诊断范围,也会影响管理推理。我们的研究探讨了睡眠减少和其他分散注意力的环境因素(如英语水平有限)是否会导致情境特异性,从而导致管理推理的次优。方法:17名住院医生参加了一项为期两个月的研究(包括一次门诊和一次住院轮换),其中他们的睡眠被跟踪。在每次轮换之后,参与者观看了两个临床遭遇视频——一个有分散注意力的背景因素,另一个没有——并为每个视频完成了讨论他们的管理计划的思考访谈。访谈记录和评估管理推理主题。结果:门诊轮转的住院医师(n=17)比住院轮转的住院医师(450.5 min±7.13 vs. 425.6 min±10.78,p=0.023)睡眠时间更长。确定了五个管理推理主题:有组织的知识,无组织的知识,不确定性,解决非药物干预,以及解决患者的需求和关注。睡眠时间多或少的居民(25次vs. 27次,p=0.78)或暴露于背景因素与未暴露于背景因素的居民(24次vs. 28次,p=0.58)之间有组织知识主题的话语流行率基本上没有差异。然而,无序知识主题在暴露于背景因素的参与者中被观察到的频率显著更高(33比18次,p=0.036)。结论:住院医师在门诊轮转期间睡眠较多。虽然单独的睡眠与管理推理主题的流行程度无关,但暴露于具有分散上下文因素的视频的居民显示出更多的无组织知识实例,支持管理推理中的上下文特异性现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信