Western and Eastern experience in treating perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: retrospective bi-centre study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf019
Hannes Jansson, Atsushi Oba, Aya Maekawa, Christina Villard, Kosuke Kobayashi, Yoshihiro Ono, Jennie Engstrand, Fumihiro Kawano, Hiromichi Ito, Stefan Gilg, Yosuke Inoue, Melroy A D'Souza, Yu Takahashi
{"title":"Western and Eastern experience in treating perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: retrospective bi-centre study.","authors":"Hannes Jansson, Atsushi Oba, Aya Maekawa, Christina Villard, Kosuke Kobayashi, Yoshihiro Ono, Jennie Engstrand, Fumihiro Kawano, Hiromichi Ito, Stefan Gilg, Yosuke Inoue, Melroy A D'Souza, Yu Takahashi","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resection outcomes for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma differ between Western and Eastern centres, but reasons behind these disparities remain unclear. This study aimed to compare current outcomes between a Western and an Eastern expert centre to identify prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent hepatobiliary resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2010 and 2022 at Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) and Cancer Institute Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were retrospectively included. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival, postoperative complications and 90-day mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and forty-nine patients were included (Cancer Institute Hospital n = 159, Karolinska n = 90). Median overall survival was 20.4 months at Karolinska and 52.0 months at Cancer Institute Hospital (P < 0.001). Median disease-free survival was 11.9 months at Karolinska and 32.4 months at Cancer Institute Hospital (P < 0.001). Advanced tumours, ASA class ≥III, poor differentiation and radial margin positivity were more common in the Western cohort. Treatment centre, T-status, N1-status, resection side, R1-status, age and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were prognostic for overall survival. The Eastern cohort had a lower rate of postoperative complications (24.5%) and a lower mortality rate (2.5%) compared with the Western cohort (51.1% and 10.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced tumour stage and radial margin positivity contributed to poor long-term survival in the Western cohort. A higher burden of co-morbidity and a higher rate of extended resections with smaller remnant liver volume influenced the Western postoperative mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resection outcomes for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma differ between Western and Eastern centres, but reasons behind these disparities remain unclear. This study aimed to compare current outcomes between a Western and an Eastern expert centre to identify prognostic factors.

Methods: Patients who underwent hepatobiliary resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2010 and 2022 at Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) and Cancer Institute Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were retrospectively included. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival, postoperative complications and 90-day mortality rate.

Results: Two hundred and forty-nine patients were included (Cancer Institute Hospital n = 159, Karolinska n = 90). Median overall survival was 20.4 months at Karolinska and 52.0 months at Cancer Institute Hospital (P < 0.001). Median disease-free survival was 11.9 months at Karolinska and 32.4 months at Cancer Institute Hospital (P < 0.001). Advanced tumours, ASA class ≥III, poor differentiation and radial margin positivity were more common in the Western cohort. Treatment centre, T-status, N1-status, resection side, R1-status, age and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were prognostic for overall survival. The Eastern cohort had a lower rate of postoperative complications (24.5%) and a lower mortality rate (2.5%) compared with the Western cohort (51.1% and 10.0%).

Conclusion: Advanced tumour stage and radial margin positivity contributed to poor long-term survival in the Western cohort. A higher burden of co-morbidity and a higher rate of extended resections with smaller remnant liver volume influenced the Western postoperative mortality rate.

东西方治疗肝门周围胆管癌的经验:回顾性双中心研究。
背景:西方和东方中心肝门周围胆管癌的切除结果不同,但这些差异背后的原因尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较西方和东方专家中心目前的结果,以确定预后因素。方法:回顾性分析2010年至2022年间在瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡大学医院和日本东京癌症研究所医院接受肝门周围胆管癌肝胆切除术的患者。主要终点是总生存期。次要结局为无病生存、术后并发症和90天死亡率。结果:纳入249例患者(肿瘤研究所医院159例,卡罗林斯卡90例)。卡罗林斯卡医学院的中位总生存期为20.4个月,癌症研究所医院的中位总生存期为52.0个月(P < 0.001)。卡罗林斯卡医学院的中位无病生存期为11.9个月,癌症研究所医院的中位无病生存期为32.4个月(P < 0.001)。晚期肿瘤、ASA≥III级、分化差和径向缘阳性在西方队列中更为常见。治疗中心、t状态、n1状态、切除部位、r1状态、年龄和碳水化合物抗原19-9是总生存期的预后因素。与西部队列(51.1%和10.0%)相比,东部队列术后并发症发生率(24.5%)和死亡率(2.5%)较低。结论:在西方队列中,晚期肿瘤分期和径向边缘阳性导致了较差的长期生存。较高的合并症负担和较高的扩大切除率和较小的残肝体积影响了西方的术后死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信