Clinical Phenotyping of Long COVID Patients Evaluated in a Specialized Neuro-COVID Clinic.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Luana D Yamashita, Neel Desai, Abigail R Manning, Caitlin Pileggi, Sara Manning Peskin, Danielle K Sandsmark, Dennis L Kolson, Matthew K Schindler
{"title":"Clinical Phenotyping of Long COVID Patients Evaluated in a Specialized Neuro-COVID Clinic.","authors":"Luana D Yamashita, Neel Desai, Abigail R Manning, Caitlin Pileggi, Sara Manning Peskin, Danielle K Sandsmark, Dennis L Kolson, Matthew K Schindler","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report Long COVID characteristics and longitudinal courses of patients evaluated between 4/14/21-4/14/22 at the University of Pennsylvania Neurological COVID Clinic (PNCC), including clinical symptoms, neurological examination findings, and neurocognitive screening tests from a standardized PNCC neurological evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal study in a single-center tertiary care academic center. Participants include 240 patients with documented evidence of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR or antibody test who underwent initial evaluation and 182 patients with longitudinal follow-up. Main outcomes evaluated are patient demographics, duration of illness prior to self-reported improvement, and cognitive testing results-including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (version 8.2) (MoCA) and Oral Trail Making Test-B (OTMT-B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (73%) of patients did not require hospitalization for their acute COVID-19 symptoms. Frequent Long COVID complaints included headache (60%), dizziness/vertigo (40%), and disturbance of taste/smell (40%). Almost all (94%) patients reported cognitive symptoms, and over 30% of patients had abnormal scores on cognitive testing. Severe infection, fewer years of education level, and non-White race were found to be statistically associated with an increased likelihood of having abnormal scores on cognitive testing. Neuroimaging and clinical laboratory testing were largely not informative for patient care. Sixty-two percent of patients with follow-up visits self-reported improvement in their primary neurological complaint within 1 year of evaluation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Performance on standardized cognitive screening tests may not be consistent with frequently reported cognitive complaints in Long COVID patients. The most common clinical trajectory was self-reported improvement in the primary neurological symptom.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To report Long COVID characteristics and longitudinal courses of patients evaluated between 4/14/21-4/14/22 at the University of Pennsylvania Neurological COVID Clinic (PNCC), including clinical symptoms, neurological examination findings, and neurocognitive screening tests from a standardized PNCC neurological evaluation approach.

Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal study in a single-center tertiary care academic center. Participants include 240 patients with documented evidence of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR or antibody test who underwent initial evaluation and 182 patients with longitudinal follow-up. Main outcomes evaluated are patient demographics, duration of illness prior to self-reported improvement, and cognitive testing results-including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (version 8.2) (MoCA) and Oral Trail Making Test-B (OTMT-B).

Results: The majority (73%) of patients did not require hospitalization for their acute COVID-19 symptoms. Frequent Long COVID complaints included headache (60%), dizziness/vertigo (40%), and disturbance of taste/smell (40%). Almost all (94%) patients reported cognitive symptoms, and over 30% of patients had abnormal scores on cognitive testing. Severe infection, fewer years of education level, and non-White race were found to be statistically associated with an increased likelihood of having abnormal scores on cognitive testing. Neuroimaging and clinical laboratory testing were largely not informative for patient care. Sixty-two percent of patients with follow-up visits self-reported improvement in their primary neurological complaint within 1 year of evaluation.

Interpretation: Performance on standardized cognitive screening tests may not be consistent with frequently reported cognitive complaints in Long COVID patients. The most common clinical trajectory was self-reported improvement in the primary neurological symptom.

在一个专门的神经-COVID诊所评估长COVID患者的临床表型。
目的:报告宾夕法尼亚大学神经学COVID临床(PNCC)于4月14日至22日期间评估的患者的长期COVID特征和纵向病程,包括临床症状、神经学检查结果和标准化PNCC神经学评估方法的神经认知筛查测试。方法:这是一项在单中心三级医疗学术中心进行的回顾性横断面和纵向研究。参与者包括240名有书面证据的SARS-CoV-2 PCR或抗体检测阳性的患者,他们接受了初步评估,182名患者接受了纵向随访。评估的主要结果是患者人口统计学特征、自我报告改善前的疾病持续时间和认知测试结果,包括蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)(8.2版)和口腔追踪测试- b (OTMT-B)。结果:大多数(73%)患者的急性COVID-19症状不需要住院治疗。常见的长期COVID主诉包括头痛(60%)、头晕/眩晕(40%)和味觉/嗅觉障碍(40%)。几乎所有(94%)患者报告认知症状,超过30%的患者在认知测试中得分异常。在统计上发现,严重感染、受教育程度较低和非白人种族与认知测试中出现异常得分的可能性增加有关。神经影像学和临床实验室检查在很大程度上不能为患者护理提供信息。62%的随访患者自我报告在1年内他们的主要神经系统疾病有所改善。解释:标准化认知筛查测试的表现可能与长COVID患者经常报告的认知投诉不一致。最常见的临床轨迹是自我报告的原发性神经症状的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信