{"title":"Loss to Follow-up and Developmental Delay in the Neonatal High-Risk Infant Follow-up Clinic.","authors":"Lilia P Christner, Emman Dabaja, Mohammad Attar","doi":"10.1055/a-2551-4622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal follow-up (NFU) clinics provide developmental assessments for infants at high risk for developmental delays. Disparities in NFU attendance and loss to follow-up (LTF) are well documented, but it is not known whether patients who are LTF have different developmental outcomes. The population of patients LTF from the NFU clinic is assumed to be homogenous, but we hypothesize there is a subpopulation of patients LTF who are receiving developmental care elsewhere. Our objective was to compare the baseline characteristics and developmental outcomes of infants who completed follow-up, infants who were LTF but seen by others in the community, and infants who were LTF but not seen by others (true LTF).Retrospective cohort study at a regional specialty center, including 262 patients referred to the NFU clinic who were born between 2014 and 2017, with a 24-month total follow-up period, such that assessment of all follow-up outcomes (NFU clinic attendance outcome, and clinician assessed developmental delay) was complete prior to March 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of developmental delay, true LTF, and referral to developmental services at initial hospital discharge.Of 262 patients, 86 (33%) were LTF from the NFU clinic. Of these, 55 (64%) had developmental assessments by other providers. Of those LTFs from NFU but seen by other providers, the prevalence of clinician-assessed developmental delay at 24 months was 67%, compared with 45% of those who completed the NFU clinic (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Social risk factors (younger mothers, late or no prenatal care, maternal smoking, or referral for a social reason) were associated with higher odds of true LTF, but no different odds of referral to developmental services at hospital discharge.A majority of patients LTF from the NFU clinic had developmental assessments by others (64%). Social risk factors were associated with true LTF and missed developmental assessments. · Sixty-four percent of patients with LTF had developmental assessments by other providers.. · Social risk factors were associated with higher odds of true LTF.. · Infants with social risk factors were not referred to developmental services early..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2551-4622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neonatal follow-up (NFU) clinics provide developmental assessments for infants at high risk for developmental delays. Disparities in NFU attendance and loss to follow-up (LTF) are well documented, but it is not known whether patients who are LTF have different developmental outcomes. The population of patients LTF from the NFU clinic is assumed to be homogenous, but we hypothesize there is a subpopulation of patients LTF who are receiving developmental care elsewhere. Our objective was to compare the baseline characteristics and developmental outcomes of infants who completed follow-up, infants who were LTF but seen by others in the community, and infants who were LTF but not seen by others (true LTF).Retrospective cohort study at a regional specialty center, including 262 patients referred to the NFU clinic who were born between 2014 and 2017, with a 24-month total follow-up period, such that assessment of all follow-up outcomes (NFU clinic attendance outcome, and clinician assessed developmental delay) was complete prior to March 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of developmental delay, true LTF, and referral to developmental services at initial hospital discharge.Of 262 patients, 86 (33%) were LTF from the NFU clinic. Of these, 55 (64%) had developmental assessments by other providers. Of those LTFs from NFU but seen by other providers, the prevalence of clinician-assessed developmental delay at 24 months was 67%, compared with 45% of those who completed the NFU clinic (p < 0.001). Social risk factors (younger mothers, late or no prenatal care, maternal smoking, or referral for a social reason) were associated with higher odds of true LTF, but no different odds of referral to developmental services at hospital discharge.A majority of patients LTF from the NFU clinic had developmental assessments by others (64%). Social risk factors were associated with true LTF and missed developmental assessments. · Sixty-four percent of patients with LTF had developmental assessments by other providers.. · Social risk factors were associated with higher odds of true LTF.. · Infants with social risk factors were not referred to developmental services early..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.