Use of an Intraoperative Head, Neck, and Back Support Exoskeleton on Surgeons' Pain and Posture.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Joseph Y Kim, Hamid Norasi, Stephen D Cassivi, Dalliah M Black, M Susan Hallbeck
{"title":"Use of an Intraoperative Head, Neck, and Back Support Exoskeleton on Surgeons' Pain and Posture.","authors":"Joseph Y Kim, Hamid Norasi, Stephen D Cassivi, Dalliah M Black, M Susan Hallbeck","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the effectiveness of an intraoperative exoskeleton that supports surgeons' heads, necks, and backs to reduce neck discomfort.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>Surgeons are at a considerable risk of developing neck pain and related injuries. Passive exoskeletons are a potential intervention to support surgeons' body parts and alleviate strain and discomfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NekSpineTM (a passive neck exoskeleton) was trialed on twelve surgeons (seven male, five female) across six specialties. Each surgeon performed four surgical procedures, two with the NekSpineTM (exoskeleton) and two without (baseline). Exoskeleton and baseline surgeries were paired primarily by surgical procedure and secondarily by duration. Surgeons completed surveys that included the NASA-TLX and usability questions before and after surgical procedures to evaluate body part discomfort, overall fatigue, workload, and potential disruptions to the surgical workflow. Surgeons also wore inertial measurement units (IMUs) to objectively record their upper arms, neck, and torso postures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of the exoskeleton yielded significant decreases in discomfort in the neck, left shoulder, right shoulder, and left arm. Reductions in percent surgical duration in Risk 4 (extreme risk postures) coupled with increases spent in Risk 2 (moderate risk postures) for the neck and torso were noted. Surgeons reported overall favorable usability results with the exoskeleton not interfering with the surgical workflow, and most stated that they would use the exoskeleton again.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NekSpineTM is a promising intervention to alleviate surgeons' neck discomfort and improve their neck and torso postures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of an intraoperative exoskeleton that supports surgeons' heads, necks, and backs to reduce neck discomfort.

Summary background data: Surgeons are at a considerable risk of developing neck pain and related injuries. Passive exoskeletons are a potential intervention to support surgeons' body parts and alleviate strain and discomfort.

Methods: The NekSpineTM (a passive neck exoskeleton) was trialed on twelve surgeons (seven male, five female) across six specialties. Each surgeon performed four surgical procedures, two with the NekSpineTM (exoskeleton) and two without (baseline). Exoskeleton and baseline surgeries were paired primarily by surgical procedure and secondarily by duration. Surgeons completed surveys that included the NASA-TLX and usability questions before and after surgical procedures to evaluate body part discomfort, overall fatigue, workload, and potential disruptions to the surgical workflow. Surgeons also wore inertial measurement units (IMUs) to objectively record their upper arms, neck, and torso postures.

Results: Use of the exoskeleton yielded significant decreases in discomfort in the neck, left shoulder, right shoulder, and left arm. Reductions in percent surgical duration in Risk 4 (extreme risk postures) coupled with increases spent in Risk 2 (moderate risk postures) for the neck and torso were noted. Surgeons reported overall favorable usability results with the exoskeleton not interfering with the surgical workflow, and most stated that they would use the exoskeleton again.

Conclusions: The NekSpineTM is a promising intervention to alleviate surgeons' neck discomfort and improve their neck and torso postures.

术中头颈背部支撑外骨骼对外科医生疼痛和姿势的影响。
目的:评估术中外骨骼支撑外科医生头部、颈部和背部以减少颈部不适的有效性。摘要背景资料:外科医生发生颈部疼痛和相关损伤的风险相当大。被动式外骨骼是一种潜在的干预手段,可以支持外科医生的身体部位,减轻压力和不适。方法:NekSpineTM(一种被动式颈部外骨骼)在6个专科的12名外科医生(7男5女)身上进行了试验。每位外科医生进行了四次手术,两次使用NekSpineTM(外骨骼),两次不使用(基线)。外骨骼和基线手术的配对主要是手术程序,其次是持续时间。外科医生在手术前后完成了包括NASA-TLX和可用性问题的调查,以评估身体部位的不适、整体疲劳、工作量和对手术工作流程的潜在干扰。外科医生还佩戴惯性测量装置(imu)来客观记录他们的上臂、颈部和躯干姿势。结果:外骨骼的使用显著减少了颈部、左肩、右肩和左臂的不适。风险4(极端风险姿势)的手术时间百分比减少,而风险2(中度风险姿势)的颈部和躯干手术时间百分比增加。外科医生报告了外骨骼总体上良好的可用性结果,没有干扰手术工作流程,大多数人表示他们会再次使用外骨骼。结论:NekSpineTM是一种很有前途的干预措施,可以减轻外科医生的颈部不适,改善他们的颈部和躯干姿势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信