Quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate urinary catheterisation on a clinical teaching unit.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Catherine M Andary, Meera Shah, Shijie Zhou, Rishi Sharma, Azim Gangji, Seychelle Yohanna
{"title":"Quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate urinary catheterisation on a clinical teaching unit.","authors":"Catherine M Andary, Meera Shah, Shijie Zhou, Rishi Sharma, Azim Gangji, Seychelle Yohanna","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indwelling urinary catheters are often inserted and retained without appropriate indications in the inpatient setting, leading to catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Previous multidisciplinary toolkits have created modest reductions in inappropriate catheterisation, but these effects were not sustained. This study aimed to achieve a 50% reduction in catheter-days and CAUTIs per 100 patient-days in a general medicine ward at a Canadian tertiary care hospital.A preintervention evaluation of urinary catheterisation was completed by retrospective chart review from 2020 to 2022. A quality improvement initiative was then conducted using an interrupted time series design. Patients admitted during the study period to general internal medicine on the pilot ward with an indwelling urinary catheter were included.A physician-targeted intervention in the electronic medical record system triggered reminders for patients with catheters inserted for more than 24 hours. The second intervention implemented standardised discussion of catheterised patients in daily multidisciplinary rounds. Finally, a chronic catheter order was created for patients with chronic indwelling catheters.Our outcome measures were the number of catheter-days and CAUTIs per 100 patient-days. Process measures were the utilisation of electronic reminder features and implementation of catheter review during multidisciplinary rounds. The balancing measure was the frequency of urinary catheter reinsertion following a failed trial of void.Catheter-days per 100 patient-days decreased from 14.2 to 5.8 days postintervention. CAUTIs decreased from 0.47 to 0.31 CAUTI per 100 patient-days. On average, 80% of patients with catheters were reviewed monthly during multidisciplinary rounds. 24 patients required catheter reinsertion postintervention due to a failed trial of void.The implementation of a multifaceted approach on a general medicine ward consisting of physician reminders, standardised discussion of catheters in multidisciplinary rounds and chronic catheter orders was associated with a sustained reduction in catheter use and CAUTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indwelling urinary catheters are often inserted and retained without appropriate indications in the inpatient setting, leading to catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Previous multidisciplinary toolkits have created modest reductions in inappropriate catheterisation, but these effects were not sustained. This study aimed to achieve a 50% reduction in catheter-days and CAUTIs per 100 patient-days in a general medicine ward at a Canadian tertiary care hospital.A preintervention evaluation of urinary catheterisation was completed by retrospective chart review from 2020 to 2022. A quality improvement initiative was then conducted using an interrupted time series design. Patients admitted during the study period to general internal medicine on the pilot ward with an indwelling urinary catheter were included.A physician-targeted intervention in the electronic medical record system triggered reminders for patients with catheters inserted for more than 24 hours. The second intervention implemented standardised discussion of catheterised patients in daily multidisciplinary rounds. Finally, a chronic catheter order was created for patients with chronic indwelling catheters.Our outcome measures were the number of catheter-days and CAUTIs per 100 patient-days. Process measures were the utilisation of electronic reminder features and implementation of catheter review during multidisciplinary rounds. The balancing measure was the frequency of urinary catheter reinsertion following a failed trial of void.Catheter-days per 100 patient-days decreased from 14.2 to 5.8 days postintervention. CAUTIs decreased from 0.47 to 0.31 CAUTI per 100 patient-days. On average, 80% of patients with catheters were reviewed monthly during multidisciplinary rounds. 24 patients required catheter reinsertion postintervention due to a failed trial of void.The implementation of a multifaceted approach on a general medicine ward consisting of physician reminders, standardised discussion of catheters in multidisciplinary rounds and chronic catheter orders was associated with a sustained reduction in catheter use and CAUTIs.

质量改进倡议,以减少临床教学单位的不当导尿。
留置导尿管经常在没有适当适应症的情况下插入和保留,导致导尿管相关性尿路感染(CAUTIs)。以前的多学科工具包已经适度减少了不适当的导尿,但这些效果并没有持续下去。本研究旨在使加拿大一家三级医院普通内科病房每100个病人日的导管日数和CAUTIs减少50%。通过2020年至2022年的回顾性图表回顾,完成了尿导尿的干预前评估。然后使用中断时间序列设计进行质量改进计划。研究期间在试点病房接受普通内科留置导尿的患者包括在内。在电子病历系统中,针对医生的干预触发了对插入导尿管超过24小时的患者的提醒。第二个干预措施在每日多学科查房中对插管患者进行标准化讨论。最后,建立了慢性留置导管患者的慢性导管医嘱。我们的结局指标是每100患者日导管天数和CAUTIs的数量。过程措施是利用电子提醒功能和在多学科查房期间实施导管审查。平衡措施是在无效试验失败后重新插入导尿管的频率。干预后每100个患者日导管天数从14.2天减少到5.8天。CAUTIs从每100患者日0.47下降到0.31。在多学科查房期间,平均80%的置管患者每月接受复查。24例患者由于无效试验失败,介入治疗后需要重新插入导管。在普通病房实施多方面的方法,包括医生提醒、多学科查房中对导管的标准化讨论和慢性导管订单,与导管使用和CAUTIs的持续减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信