Evaporite Collapse, Karst and Detrital Carbonate Breccias in the Zechstein Reservoir of the Alma Field, Central North Sea: Characterisation, Controls and Implications for Reservoir Quality

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Peter Gutteridge
{"title":"Evaporite Collapse, Karst and Detrital Carbonate Breccias in the Zechstein Reservoir of the Alma Field, Central North Sea: Characterisation, Controls and Implications for Reservoir Quality","authors":"Peter Gutteridge","doi":"10.1111/jpg.12882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Zechstein reservoir of the Alma field (originally Argyll, formerly Ardmore) comprises at least four Zechstein carbonate and evaporite sequences, the latter dissolved during Jurassic exposure, forming a series of collapse breccias that were modified by karst, erosion and faulting. It is essential to identify the different origins of these breccia bodies because these processes produce zones of excess permeability with contrasting stratiform and cross-cutting geometry. In core, these breccia bodies are distinguished by their clast assemblage and fabric, the relationship of clasts and matrix, the presence of sedimentary structures and the nature of their upper and lower boundaries. Predicting the distribution, architecture and reservoir quality of these geobodies is key to managing reservoir development programmes in similar carbonate fields affected by karst, collapse brecciation, reworking and faulting. It requires an understanding of the stratigraphy of the reservoir, particularly that of any internal aquicludes, mapping the palaeogeology of the top reservoir and understanding the onlap history of the exposure surface. The Alma reservoir contains a field-wide impermeable layer, the Sapropelic Dolomite deposited in a basinal setting that controlled the influx of meteoric water during exposure. The lower dolomite breccia, which underlies the Sapropelic Dolomite, represents a stratiform evaporite collapse breccia formed by dissolution in meteoric water that was introduced down-dip beneath the Sapropelic Dolomite. The upper dolomite breccia formed by dissolution of one or more evaporite units by direct infiltration of meteoric water from the top Zechstein surface. During the Jurassic, the top Zechstein surface was modified by karst, apart from the SW part of the Alma field, where the Zechstein was buried by the onlapping impermeable Triassic Smith Bank Formation. Core also shows that there is limited karst development over the sub-crop of the Sapropelic Dolomite. The Zechstein is partly onlapped by Jurassic detrital conglomerates reworked from the brecciated Zechstein and deposited in alluvial fan, shore face and low-energy subtidal settings along the western margin of the field. A well-preserved matrix pore system can be expected within collapse breccias and karst cavities where the Zechstein is overlain by Jurassic detrital sandstone and carbonate breccias. However, in areas onlapped by impermeable sediment, the karst and collapse breccias are likely to contain much poorer reservoir quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","volume":"48 2","pages":"111-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpg.12882","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpg.12882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Zechstein reservoir of the Alma field (originally Argyll, formerly Ardmore) comprises at least four Zechstein carbonate and evaporite sequences, the latter dissolved during Jurassic exposure, forming a series of collapse breccias that were modified by karst, erosion and faulting. It is essential to identify the different origins of these breccia bodies because these processes produce zones of excess permeability with contrasting stratiform and cross-cutting geometry. In core, these breccia bodies are distinguished by their clast assemblage and fabric, the relationship of clasts and matrix, the presence of sedimentary structures and the nature of their upper and lower boundaries. Predicting the distribution, architecture and reservoir quality of these geobodies is key to managing reservoir development programmes in similar carbonate fields affected by karst, collapse brecciation, reworking and faulting. It requires an understanding of the stratigraphy of the reservoir, particularly that of any internal aquicludes, mapping the palaeogeology of the top reservoir and understanding the onlap history of the exposure surface. The Alma reservoir contains a field-wide impermeable layer, the Sapropelic Dolomite deposited in a basinal setting that controlled the influx of meteoric water during exposure. The lower dolomite breccia, which underlies the Sapropelic Dolomite, represents a stratiform evaporite collapse breccia formed by dissolution in meteoric water that was introduced down-dip beneath the Sapropelic Dolomite. The upper dolomite breccia formed by dissolution of one or more evaporite units by direct infiltration of meteoric water from the top Zechstein surface. During the Jurassic, the top Zechstein surface was modified by karst, apart from the SW part of the Alma field, where the Zechstein was buried by the onlapping impermeable Triassic Smith Bank Formation. Core also shows that there is limited karst development over the sub-crop of the Sapropelic Dolomite. The Zechstein is partly onlapped by Jurassic detrital conglomerates reworked from the brecciated Zechstein and deposited in alluvial fan, shore face and low-energy subtidal settings along the western margin of the field. A well-preserved matrix pore system can be expected within collapse breccias and karst cavities where the Zechstein is overlain by Jurassic detrital sandstone and carbonate breccias. However, in areas onlapped by impermeable sediment, the karst and collapse breccias are likely to contain much poorer reservoir quality.

Abstract Image

北海中部阿尔玛气田Zechstein储层中的蒸发岩崩塌、岩溶和碎屑碳酸盐岩角砾岩:表征、控制因素及其对储层质量的影响
阿尔玛气田(原Argyll,原Ardmore)的Zechstein储层包括至少四个Zechstein碳酸盐岩和蒸发岩层,后者在侏罗纪暴露期溶解,形成一系列经岩溶、侵蚀和断裂作用改造的塌缩角砾岩。识别这些角砾岩体的不同起源是至关重要的,因为这些过程产生了具有对比地层和横切几何形状的超渗透带。在岩心中,这些角砾岩体可通过碎屑组合和组构、碎屑与基质的关系、沉积构造的存在及其上下边界的性质来区分。预测这些地质体的分布、构造和储层质量是管理受岩溶、塌缩角化、改造和断裂影响的类似碳酸盐岩油田储层开发计划的关键。它需要了解储层的地层学,特别是任何内部水层的地层学,绘制顶部储层的古地质图,并了解暴露表面的上覆历史。Alma储层包含一个全区范围的不透水层,即沉积在盆地环境中的腐泥白云岩,在暴露期间控制了大气水的流入。下白云岩角砾岩位于腐泥质白云岩之下,是一种层状蒸发塌缩角砾岩,是由从腐泥质白云岩下向下注入的大气水溶蚀而形成的。上白云岩角砾岩是由一个或多个蒸发岩单元直接从泽赫施泰因表层渗入的大气水溶解而形成的。侏罗纪时期,除了阿尔玛气田的西南部分被重叠的不透水的三叠系史密斯滩组埋没外,zeechstein的顶部表面被喀斯特作用改造。岩心还显示腐泥白云岩亚层岩溶发育有限。Zechstein部分被角化Zechstein改造后的侏罗纪碎屑砾岩覆盖,沉积于西缘的冲积扇、滨面和低能潮下环境中。在侏罗统碎屑砂岩和碳酸盐岩角砾岩覆盖的碎裂角砾岩和喀斯特溶洞中,可以预期保存完好的基质孔隙系统。然而,在不透水沉积物重叠的地区,喀斯特和塌陷角砾岩可能含有更差的储层质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Geology
Journal of Petroleum Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Petroleum Geology is a quarterly journal devoted to the geology of oil and natural gas. Editorial preference is given to original papers on oilfield regions of the world outside North America and on topics of general application in petroleum exploration and development operations, including geochemical and geophysical studies, basin modelling and reservoir evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信