Sandra Pareja-Ortega, Rafael A. Cabral-Tena, Alma Paola Rodríguez-Troncoso, Lorenzo Álvarez-Filip, Luis E. Calderon-Aguilera, J. Adán Avilés-Chávez, Raquel Negrete-Aranda, Amílcar L. Cupul-Magaña
{"title":"The Roles of Secondary Calcifiers in Reef Construction and Maintenance in Coral and Rocky Reefs of the Mexican Pacific","authors":"Sandra Pareja-Ortega, Rafael A. Cabral-Tena, Alma Paola Rodríguez-Troncoso, Lorenzo Álvarez-Filip, Luis E. Calderon-Aguilera, J. Adán Avilés-Chávez, Raquel Negrete-Aranda, Amílcar L. Cupul-Magaña","doi":"10.1111/maec.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Carbonate production by sclerobionts was quantified with calcification-accretion units (CAUs) to evaluate the roles of different taxonomic groups in the construction and maintenance of coral reef structures in two sites in the Mexican Pacific with contrasting environmental characteristics: Yelapa and Isla Espíritu Santo (IES). Five CAUs were collected every 6 months for 2 years. The average calcification rate in Yelapa and IES was 1.04 ± 0.11 kg m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> and 1.01 ± 0.82 kg m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; no difference in calcification was found between sites (<i>H</i> = 0.13, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.71), although significant differences in calcification were found over time (<i>H</i> = 9.13, df = 3, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Barnacles exhibited the highest calcification rate (Yelapa: 0.63 ± 0.8 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.54 ± 0.6 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), followed by mollusks (Yelapa: 0.27 ± 0.35, IES: 0.18 ± 0.26 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), crustose coralline algae (CCA) (Yelapa: 0.025 ± 0.029 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.08 ± 0.11 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), and bryozoans (Yelapa: 0.04 ± 0.06 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.11 ± 0.11 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). Cover was dominated by barnacles (27.7%), CCA (16.5%), and mollusks (13.7%) in Yelapa and by bryozoans (27.9%), CCA (20.4%), and barnacles (17.4%) in IES. The coverage of all groups (except CCA) was different between sites, and all taxonomic groups (except foraminifera) exhibited differences over time. The role of each taxonomic group was attributed according to their substrate preference (exposed or cryptic). In Yelapa, bryozoans and polychaetes filled cavities, while CCAs and bryozoans contributed to vertical reef accretion in IES.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49883,"journal":{"name":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carbonate production by sclerobionts was quantified with calcification-accretion units (CAUs) to evaluate the roles of different taxonomic groups in the construction and maintenance of coral reef structures in two sites in the Mexican Pacific with contrasting environmental characteristics: Yelapa and Isla Espíritu Santo (IES). Five CAUs were collected every 6 months for 2 years. The average calcification rate in Yelapa and IES was 1.04 ± 0.11 kg m−2 year−1 and 1.01 ± 0.82 kg m−2 year−1; no difference in calcification was found between sites (H = 0.13, df = 1, p = 0.71), although significant differences in calcification were found over time (H = 9.13, df = 3, p = 0.03). Barnacles exhibited the highest calcification rate (Yelapa: 0.63 ± 0.8 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1; IES: 0.54 ± 0.6 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1), followed by mollusks (Yelapa: 0.27 ± 0.35, IES: 0.18 ± 0.26 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1), crustose coralline algae (CCA) (Yelapa: 0.025 ± 0.029 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1; IES: 0.08 ± 0.11 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1), and bryozoans (Yelapa: 0.04 ± 0.06 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1; IES: 0.11 ± 0.11 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1). Cover was dominated by barnacles (27.7%), CCA (16.5%), and mollusks (13.7%) in Yelapa and by bryozoans (27.9%), CCA (20.4%), and barnacles (17.4%) in IES. The coverage of all groups (except CCA) was different between sites, and all taxonomic groups (except foraminifera) exhibited differences over time. The role of each taxonomic group was attributed according to their substrate preference (exposed or cryptic). In Yelapa, bryozoans and polychaetes filled cavities, while CCAs and bryozoans contributed to vertical reef accretion in IES.
期刊介绍:
Marine Ecology publishes original contributions on the structure and dynamics of marine benthic and pelagic ecosystems, communities and populations, and on the critical links between ecology and the evolution of marine organisms.
The journal prioritizes contributions elucidating fundamental aspects of species interaction and adaptation to the environment through integration of information from various organizational levels (molecules to ecosystems) and different disciplines (molecular biology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, marine biology, natural history, geography, oceanography, palaeontology and modelling) as viewed from an ecological perspective. The journal also focuses on population genetic processes, evolution of life histories, morphological traits and behaviour, historical ecology and biogeography, macro-ecology and seascape ecology, palaeo-ecological reconstruction, and ecological changes due to introduction of new biota, human pressure or environmental change.
Most applied marine science, including fisheries biology, aquaculture, natural-products chemistry, toxicology, and local pollution studies lie outside the scope of the journal. Papers should address ecological questions that would be of interest to a worldwide readership of ecologists; papers of mostly local interest, including descriptions of flora and fauna, taxonomic descriptions, and range extensions will not be considered.