Acknowledging a Stutter Affects the Impression One Makes in a Job Interview

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jennifer Perez, Leonard S. Newman, Jenna M. Walmer
{"title":"Acknowledging a Stutter Affects the Impression One Makes in a Job Interview","authors":"Jennifer Perez,&nbsp;Leonard S. Newman,&nbsp;Jenna M. Walmer","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People who have a stutter are often viewed negatively by others. Acknowledgement—defined as notifying others up front about characteristics that might lead one to be evaluated negatively—might be an effective impression management strategy for people stigmatized by stuttering. Past research testing this hypothesis, however, has produced inconsistent findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness of acknowledgement by people who stutter as a strategy for eliciting more positive evaluations from others while controlling for possible methodological problems in past research. Participants were expected to be more likely overall to find job applicants without a stutter to be better candidates for a job than those with a stutter. However, it was also hypothesized that this difference would not be significant when candidates with a stutter acknowledged it.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods &amp; Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>Participants watched two simulated job interview videos: in one, the applicant had a stutter, and in the other, they did not. For half of the participants, the applicant who stuttered acknowledged the speech dysfluency at the beginning of the job interview. After watching each interview, the participants rated the interviewee.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes &amp; Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results revealed the predicted significant interaction between stuttering and acknowledgement: acknowledgement of the stutter led the stuttering job candidate to be evaluated just as positively as the non-stuttering job candidate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions &amp; Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This research has implications for the kind of advice practitioners can offer people anticipating interactions (such as job interviews) where they will be evaluated. The findings also potentially widen the range of circumstances in which acknowledgement can be used to counteract the negative impressions people might be biased to form of stigmatized individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What This Paper Adds</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Previous research shows that acknowledging a stigmatized identity (and other forms of acknowledgement) upfront before interacting with others in an evaluative context (such as a job interview) can often improve the impression one makes and how one's performance is perceived. However, past research evaluating this strategy in the case of stuttering has produced inconsistent findings. In addition, some past research suggests that acknowledgement might not be effective when the source of stigma is perceptually salient during the interaction.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>The results of this study, designed to control for possible methodological problems in past research, indicate that acknowledgement can in fact be an effective impression management strategy for people who stutter.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>This research has implications for the kind of advice practitioners can offer people anticipating interactions (such as job interviews) where they will be evaluated. In short, it provides a method for trying to reduce the discrimination a person who stutters might face.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People who have a stutter are often viewed negatively by others. Acknowledgement—defined as notifying others up front about characteristics that might lead one to be evaluated negatively—might be an effective impression management strategy for people stigmatized by stuttering. Past research testing this hypothesis, however, has produced inconsistent findings.

Aims

To assess the effectiveness of acknowledgement by people who stutter as a strategy for eliciting more positive evaluations from others while controlling for possible methodological problems in past research. Participants were expected to be more likely overall to find job applicants without a stutter to be better candidates for a job than those with a stutter. However, it was also hypothesized that this difference would not be significant when candidates with a stutter acknowledged it.

Methods & Procedures

Participants watched two simulated job interview videos: in one, the applicant had a stutter, and in the other, they did not. For half of the participants, the applicant who stuttered acknowledged the speech dysfluency at the beginning of the job interview. After watching each interview, the participants rated the interviewee.

Outcomes & Results

The results revealed the predicted significant interaction between stuttering and acknowledgement: acknowledgement of the stutter led the stuttering job candidate to be evaluated just as positively as the non-stuttering job candidate.

Conclusions & Implications

This research has implications for the kind of advice practitioners can offer people anticipating interactions (such as job interviews) where they will be evaluated. The findings also potentially widen the range of circumstances in which acknowledgement can be used to counteract the negative impressions people might be biased to form of stigmatized individuals.

What This Paper Adds

What is already known on the subject
  • Previous research shows that acknowledging a stigmatized identity (and other forms of acknowledgement) upfront before interacting with others in an evaluative context (such as a job interview) can often improve the impression one makes and how one's performance is perceived. However, past research evaluating this strategy in the case of stuttering has produced inconsistent findings. In addition, some past research suggests that acknowledgement might not be effective when the source of stigma is perceptually salient during the interaction.
What this paper adds to the existing knowledge
  • The results of this study, designed to control for possible methodological problems in past research, indicate that acknowledgement can in fact be an effective impression management strategy for people who stutter.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?
  • This research has implications for the kind of advice practitioners can offer people anticipating interactions (such as job interviews) where they will be evaluated. In short, it provides a method for trying to reduce the discrimination a person who stutters might face.
承认口吃会影响一个人在面试中的印象
有口吃的人通常会被别人负面地看待。承认——定义为提前通知他人可能导致负面评价的特征——可能是一种有效的印象管理策略,用于因口吃而被污名化的人。然而,过去测试这一假设的研究得出了不一致的结果。目的在控制过去研究中可能存在的方法学问题的情况下,评估口吃者承认作为一种策略的有效性,以获得他人更多的积极评价。总体而言,参与者更有可能认为没有口吃的求职者比有口吃的求职者更适合这份工作。然而,也有假设认为,当口吃者承认这一点时,这种差异就不显着了。方法,参与者观看了两个模拟的求职面试视频:在一个视频中,应聘者有口吃,而在另一个视频中,他们没有口吃。对于一半的参与者来说,口吃的申请人在面试开始时就承认自己有语言障碍。在看完每一次访谈后,参与者给被访谈者打分。结果,结果结果显示,承认与口吃之间存在显著的交互作用:承认口吃导致对口吃求职者的正面评价与对非口吃求职者的正面评价相同。结论,这项研究对从业者提供的建议类型有启示,这些建议可以预测人们的互动(如工作面试),在那里他们将被评估。研究结果还可能扩大承认可以用来抵消人们可能对被污名化的个人产生的负面印象的情况范围。之前的研究表明,在评估环境(如求职面试)中与他人互动之前,提前承认自己的身份(以及其他形式的承认),通常可以改善一个人给人的印象,以及人们对自己表现的看法。然而,过去的研究评估这种策略在口吃的情况下产生了不一致的结果。此外,过去的一些研究表明,当耻辱的来源在互动过程中感知显着时,承认可能不会有效。这项研究旨在控制过去研究中可能存在的方法问题,其结果表明,对于口吃者来说,承认实际上是一种有效的印象管理策略。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?这项研究暗示了从业者可以给人们提供预测互动(比如工作面试)的建议,在那里他们将被评估。简而言之,它提供了一种试图减少口吃者可能面临的歧视的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信