Advances in biomarkers of acute allograft rejection and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy in kidney transplantation; future perspective and challenges in clinical implementation

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Tanguy Lafont , Subhankar Mukhopadhyay , Sohani N. Dassanayake , Maria Hernández-Fuentes , Paramit Chowdhury , Theodoros Kassimatis
{"title":"Advances in biomarkers of acute allograft rejection and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy in kidney transplantation; future perspective and challenges in clinical implementation","authors":"Tanguy Lafont ,&nbsp;Subhankar Mukhopadhyay ,&nbsp;Sohani N. Dassanayake ,&nbsp;Maria Hernández-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Paramit Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Theodoros Kassimatis","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2025.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute rejection (AR) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) are significant complications of kidney transplantation that have a negative impact on renal graft lifespan. Kidney transplant monitoring is currently performed with the use of on nonspecific biomarkers (serum creatinine and proteinuria) which have significant limitations and detect AR and IFTA only after significant damage to the kidney has been done. Moreover, many transplant patients are found to have histological evidence of rejection despite a stable creatinine (subclinical rejection – SCR). The “gold standard” diagnostic test for AR and IFTA is the transplant biopsy that also comes with limitations and can have major complications; therefore, it is not an ideal test for routine graft monitoring. The use of novel non-invasive (blood and urine) and invasive (graft biopsy) biomarkers, partly driven by advances in omics technologies, can lead to earlier and more accurate detection of AR/SCR and IFTA and to improved graft monitoring. The identification of the immunological pathways of AR/IFTA may also enable the design of tailormade treatments. This minireview provides a state-of-the-art update on current evidence and limitations from key studies on non-invasive and invasive biomarkers of AR/SCR and IFTA and gives a perspective on their potential future implementation and the underlying challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"39 3","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X25000308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute rejection (AR) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) are significant complications of kidney transplantation that have a negative impact on renal graft lifespan. Kidney transplant monitoring is currently performed with the use of on nonspecific biomarkers (serum creatinine and proteinuria) which have significant limitations and detect AR and IFTA only after significant damage to the kidney has been done. Moreover, many transplant patients are found to have histological evidence of rejection despite a stable creatinine (subclinical rejection – SCR). The “gold standard” diagnostic test for AR and IFTA is the transplant biopsy that also comes with limitations and can have major complications; therefore, it is not an ideal test for routine graft monitoring. The use of novel non-invasive (blood and urine) and invasive (graft biopsy) biomarkers, partly driven by advances in omics technologies, can lead to earlier and more accurate detection of AR/SCR and IFTA and to improved graft monitoring. The identification of the immunological pathways of AR/IFTA may also enable the design of tailormade treatments. This minireview provides a state-of-the-art update on current evidence and limitations from key studies on non-invasive and invasive biomarkers of AR/SCR and IFTA and gives a perspective on their potential future implementation and the underlying challenges.
肾移植急性排斥反应和肾间质纤维化/肾小管萎缩生物标志物研究进展临床实施的未来展望与挑战
急性排斥反应(AR)和间质纤维化/肾小管萎缩(IFTA)是肾移植的重要并发症,对移植肾的寿命有负面影响。肾移植监测目前使用非特异性生物标志物(血清肌酐和蛋白尿)进行,这些标志物具有明显的局限性,只有在肾脏受到严重损害后才能检测到AR和IFTA。此外,许多移植患者在肌酐稳定(亚临床排斥反应- SCR)的情况下仍有组织学排斥反应的证据。AR和IFTA的“金标准”诊断测试是移植活检,但也有局限性,并可能产生主要并发症;因此,它不是常规移植物监测的理想测试。在组学技术进步的推动下,使用新的非侵入性(血液和尿液)和侵入性(移植物活检)生物标志物,可以更早、更准确地检测AR/SCR和IFTA,并改善移植物监测。识别AR/IFTA的免疫途径也可能使设计量身定制的治疗成为可能。这篇小型综述提供了最新的AR/SCR和IFTA的非侵入性和侵入性生物标志物关键研究的最新证据和局限性,并对其潜在的未来实施和潜在的挑战进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信