Advances in biomarkers of acute allograft rejection and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy in kidney transplantation; future perspective and challenges in clinical implementation

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Tanguy Lafont , Subhankar Mukhopadhyay , Sohani N. Dassanayake , Maria Hernández-Fuentes , Paramit Chowdhury , Theodoros Kassimatis
{"title":"Advances in biomarkers of acute allograft rejection and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy in kidney transplantation; future perspective and challenges in clinical implementation","authors":"Tanguy Lafont ,&nbsp;Subhankar Mukhopadhyay ,&nbsp;Sohani N. Dassanayake ,&nbsp;Maria Hernández-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Paramit Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Theodoros Kassimatis","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2025.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute rejection (AR) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) are significant complications of kidney transplantation that have a negative impact on renal graft lifespan. Kidney transplant monitoring is currently performed with the use of on nonspecific biomarkers (serum creatinine and proteinuria) which have significant limitations and detect AR and IFTA only after significant damage to the kidney has been done. Moreover, many transplant patients are found to have histological evidence of rejection despite a stable creatinine (subclinical rejection – SCR). The “gold standard” diagnostic test for AR and IFTA is the transplant biopsy that also comes with limitations and can have major complications; therefore, it is not an ideal test for routine graft monitoring. The use of novel non-invasive (blood and urine) and invasive (graft biopsy) biomarkers, partly driven by advances in omics technologies, can lead to earlier and more accurate detection of AR/SCR and IFTA and to improved graft monitoring. The identification of the immunological pathways of AR/IFTA may also enable the design of tailormade treatments. This minireview provides a state-of-the-art update on current evidence and limitations from key studies on non-invasive and invasive biomarkers of AR/SCR and IFTA and gives a perspective on their potential future implementation and the underlying challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"39 3","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X25000308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute rejection (AR) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) are significant complications of kidney transplantation that have a negative impact on renal graft lifespan. Kidney transplant monitoring is currently performed with the use of on nonspecific biomarkers (serum creatinine and proteinuria) which have significant limitations and detect AR and IFTA only after significant damage to the kidney has been done. Moreover, many transplant patients are found to have histological evidence of rejection despite a stable creatinine (subclinical rejection – SCR). The “gold standard” diagnostic test for AR and IFTA is the transplant biopsy that also comes with limitations and can have major complications; therefore, it is not an ideal test for routine graft monitoring. The use of novel non-invasive (blood and urine) and invasive (graft biopsy) biomarkers, partly driven by advances in omics technologies, can lead to earlier and more accurate detection of AR/SCR and IFTA and to improved graft monitoring. The identification of the immunological pathways of AR/IFTA may also enable the design of tailormade treatments. This minireview provides a state-of-the-art update on current evidence and limitations from key studies on non-invasive and invasive biomarkers of AR/SCR and IFTA and gives a perspective on their potential future implementation and the underlying challenges.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信