Chinese postpartum mothers’ perspectives about the usage of donor milk and human milk banks: A qualitative study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yan-Qiong Ouyang , Shi-Yun Wang , Yi-Yan Huang , Na Zhang , Xin Wang , Jun-Yan Li , Shu-Wen Yue , Sharon R. Redding
{"title":"Chinese postpartum mothers’ perspectives about the usage of donor milk and human milk banks: A qualitative study","authors":"Yan-Qiong Ouyang ,&nbsp;Shi-Yun Wang ,&nbsp;Yi-Yan Huang ,&nbsp;Na Zhang ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Jun-Yan Li ,&nbsp;Shu-Wen Yue ,&nbsp;Sharon R. Redding","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Human milk banks (HMBs) were established to provide safe human milk for infants in need. However, the number and volume of donors are insufficient in China. This study aimed to explore Chinese postpartum mothers perspectives on the use of donor milk and the implementation of HMBs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A descriptive phenomenology design with semi-structured interviews was used to collect data involving 18 postpartum mothers from January to June 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed that participants had limited knowledge of donor milk and human milk banks, faced multiple barriers to accessing donor milk, and exhibited diverse motivations for considering its use. Key barriers included misconceptions about the value of donor milk for premature infants, concerns over quality and safety, psychological hesitations, and limited access to human milk banks. However, some participants saw donor milk as a way to support breastfeeding beliefs and alleviate the burdens associated with breastfeeding.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study explored challenges in HMBs and donor milk use, emphasizing the necessity for targeted education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825001263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Human milk banks (HMBs) were established to provide safe human milk for infants in need. However, the number and volume of donors are insufficient in China. This study aimed to explore Chinese postpartum mothers perspectives on the use of donor milk and the implementation of HMBs.

Method

A descriptive phenomenology design with semi-structured interviews was used to collect data involving 18 postpartum mothers from January to June 2021.

Results

The study revealed that participants had limited knowledge of donor milk and human milk banks, faced multiple barriers to accessing donor milk, and exhibited diverse motivations for considering its use. Key barriers included misconceptions about the value of donor milk for premature infants, concerns over quality and safety, psychological hesitations, and limited access to human milk banks. However, some participants saw donor milk as a way to support breastfeeding beliefs and alleviate the burdens associated with breastfeeding.

Discussion

This study explored challenges in HMBs and donor milk use, emphasizing the necessity for targeted education.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信