Predictors of residence in areas that experience drought and concern about drought in the United States

Matthew R Boyce , Christine Crudo Blackburn , Mayra Rico , Jason Moats
{"title":"Predictors of residence in areas that experience drought and concern about drought in the United States","authors":"Matthew R Boyce ,&nbsp;Christine Crudo Blackburn ,&nbsp;Mayra Rico ,&nbsp;Jason Moats","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While some natural hazard events are well studied, drought has been relatively neglected. This is notable given that drought is expected to increase in frequency and intensity in the future. This study investigated the associations between various socioeconomic and demographic factors and living in an area that experiences drought, as well as perspectives related to drought in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A survey was used to examine drought experiences and perceptions by asking (1) if individuals lived in an area that experiences drought, (2) whether they consider drought to be a natural disaster, and (3) if they worried about drought negatively impacting them. Surveys were administered from April–June 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>2989 individuals completed the survey. Regression results suggest the odds of living in an area that experiences drought are higher for select older populations, for those with higher levels of education, and for those residing in rural areas. For those who do live in areas that experience drought (<em>n</em> = 1655), most consider drought to be a natural disaster, but the odds of worrying about being negatively impacted by drought are significantly lower for those ages 55–64 and identifying politically as Republican or Independent.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Certain populations reported higher odds of living in an area that experiences drought, but lower odds of reporting concern about the negative health impacts. Similar phenomena have been observed with other natural hazards, such as hurricanes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results can aid public health researchers and practitioners in focusing drought preparedness and educational efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278225000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

While some natural hazard events are well studied, drought has been relatively neglected. This is notable given that drought is expected to increase in frequency and intensity in the future. This study investigated the associations between various socioeconomic and demographic factors and living in an area that experiences drought, as well as perspectives related to drought in the United States.

Methods

A survey was used to examine drought experiences and perceptions by asking (1) if individuals lived in an area that experiences drought, (2) whether they consider drought to be a natural disaster, and (3) if they worried about drought negatively impacting them. Surveys were administered from April–June 2024.

Results

2989 individuals completed the survey. Regression results suggest the odds of living in an area that experiences drought are higher for select older populations, for those with higher levels of education, and for those residing in rural areas. For those who do live in areas that experience drought (n = 1655), most consider drought to be a natural disaster, but the odds of worrying about being negatively impacted by drought are significantly lower for those ages 55–64 and identifying politically as Republican or Independent.

Discussion

Certain populations reported higher odds of living in an area that experiences drought, but lower odds of reporting concern about the negative health impacts. Similar phenomena have been observed with other natural hazards, such as hurricanes.

Conclusion

Results can aid public health researchers and practitioners in focusing drought preparedness and educational efforts.
在美国,居住在经历干旱和关注干旱地区的预测者
虽然一些自然灾害事件得到了很好的研究,但干旱却相对被忽视了。鉴于预计未来干旱的频率和强度都将增加,这一点值得注意。本研究调查了各种社会经济和人口因素与生活在干旱地区之间的关系,以及与美国干旱有关的观点。方法采用一项调查,通过询问(1)个人是否生活在经历干旱的地区,(2)他们是否认为干旱是一种自然灾害,(3)他们是否担心干旱会对他们产生负面影响,来检验干旱经历和看法。调查于2024年4月至6月进行。结果共有2989人完成调查。回归结果表明,对于特定的老年人口、教育水平较高的人以及居住在农村地区的人来说,生活在经历干旱地区的几率更高。对于那些生活在经历干旱地区的人(n = 1655),大多数人认为干旱是一种自然灾害,但对于那些年龄在55-64岁之间、政治上认为是共和党或独立派的人来说,担心受到干旱负面影响的几率要低得多。某些人群报告说,生活在经历干旱的地区的几率更高,但报告担心负面健康影响的几率较低。在飓风等其他自然灾害中也观察到类似的现象。结论研究结果有助于公共卫生研究人员和从业人员加强抗旱防范和教育工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信