{"title":"Blast response of a scaled reinforced concrete structure with Two-Leaf cavity infill wall","authors":"Ahmet Tuğrul Toy , Onur Onat , Barış Sevim","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear power plants, composed of boiler houses, reactors, and other facilities, operate at a high risk of explosion. Engineers design boiler hoses and other facilities to withstand dynamic loads like earthquakes, machine vibrations, wind, and blast loads. However, over time, these structures may cease to meet the requirements of current codes. Therefore, it remains unclear how different materials, their orientations, and their interactions, such as masonry and reinforced concrete, will respond in the event of a blast around a nuclear power plant. Currently, this study aims to evaluate the global and local blast response of single and two-leaf cavity infill wall enclosures with reinforced concrete structures. For this purpose, a scaled structure that is exposed to a shake table experiment has been selected. Then the structural system is numerically modelled by using ANSYS-AUTODYN and calibrated based on dynamic identification tests. The explosive amount is fixed at 78 kg to facilitate comparison of two models. For blast analysis of the structural system, two different infill wall typologies and three different scenarios are evaluated. The location of explosives determined the studied cases. We register the analytical blast responses in terms of the pressure, strain, and out-of-plane displacement of the infill wall. We limited the blast analyses to 3 ms. We compared the out-of-plane displacement of single and cavity infill walls with each other and with UFC 3–340-02. According to the findings, the thinner leaf in the Two Leaf Cavity Wall model protects the thicker leaf from damage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"438 ","pages":"Article 114055"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325002328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nuclear power plants, composed of boiler houses, reactors, and other facilities, operate at a high risk of explosion. Engineers design boiler hoses and other facilities to withstand dynamic loads like earthquakes, machine vibrations, wind, and blast loads. However, over time, these structures may cease to meet the requirements of current codes. Therefore, it remains unclear how different materials, their orientations, and their interactions, such as masonry and reinforced concrete, will respond in the event of a blast around a nuclear power plant. Currently, this study aims to evaluate the global and local blast response of single and two-leaf cavity infill wall enclosures with reinforced concrete structures. For this purpose, a scaled structure that is exposed to a shake table experiment has been selected. Then the structural system is numerically modelled by using ANSYS-AUTODYN and calibrated based on dynamic identification tests. The explosive amount is fixed at 78 kg to facilitate comparison of two models. For blast analysis of the structural system, two different infill wall typologies and three different scenarios are evaluated. The location of explosives determined the studied cases. We register the analytical blast responses in terms of the pressure, strain, and out-of-plane displacement of the infill wall. We limited the blast analyses to 3 ms. We compared the out-of-plane displacement of single and cavity infill walls with each other and with UFC 3–340-02. According to the findings, the thinner leaf in the Two Leaf Cavity Wall model protects the thicker leaf from damage.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology.
Fundamentals of Reactor Design include:
• Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics
• Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA)
• Structural and Mechanical Engineering
• Materials Science
• Fuel Behavior and Design
• Structural Plant Design
• Engineering of Reactor Components
• Experiments
Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered:
• Accident Mitigation Measures
• Reactor Control Systems
• Licensing Issues
• Safeguard Engineering
• Economy of Plants
• Reprocessing / Waste Disposal
• Applications of Nuclear Energy
• Maintenance
• Decommissioning
Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.