Zhenzhong Chen , Wenhao Wang , Qianghua Pan , Guangming Guo , Xiaoke Li , Ge Chen , Xuehui Gan
{"title":"An integral method for Reliability-Based design Optimization","authors":"Zhenzhong Chen , Wenhao Wang , Qianghua Pan , Guangming Guo , Xiaoke Li , Ge Chen , Xuehui Gan","doi":"10.1016/j.cma.2025.118000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Reliability-Based design Optimization (RBDO), the aim is to develop an optimal design characterized by high reliability through fulfilling design requirements at the targeted probability threshold. The goal of reliability optimization is to obtain excellent algorithms by focusing on evaluation and optimization. In RBDO, due to the selection of evaluation methods and the problem of updating reliable point methods, it is often impossible to obtain accurate failure probability results with less computation, and the results are inaccurate, or the computation amount is increased. The integral-based reliability analysis method: Hyperspherical cap area integral method (HCAIM) can achieve an accuracy close to that of the MCS method while having a very low computational load, thus enabling the efficient and precise calculation of failure probabilities. Therefore, by introducing a reliability evaluation method based on Integral Method for Reliability Optimization (IMRO), as a decoupling method, high accuracy failure probability calculation results can be obtained with relatively small calculation amount, and then optimization results can be obtained by IMRO and sequence optimization methods. First, a reliability analysis example is utilized to demonstrate the accuracy of the reliability analysis part of IMRO. Then, a set of nonlinear challenges and diverse engineering case studies were utilized to assess the algorithm's performance. The calculation results after comparison prove that IMRO is more accurate in dealing with nonlinear problems and engineering examples, and can better meet the requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55222,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering","volume":"441 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782525002725","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Reliability-Based design Optimization (RBDO), the aim is to develop an optimal design characterized by high reliability through fulfilling design requirements at the targeted probability threshold. The goal of reliability optimization is to obtain excellent algorithms by focusing on evaluation and optimization. In RBDO, due to the selection of evaluation methods and the problem of updating reliable point methods, it is often impossible to obtain accurate failure probability results with less computation, and the results are inaccurate, or the computation amount is increased. The integral-based reliability analysis method: Hyperspherical cap area integral method (HCAIM) can achieve an accuracy close to that of the MCS method while having a very low computational load, thus enabling the efficient and precise calculation of failure probabilities. Therefore, by introducing a reliability evaluation method based on Integral Method for Reliability Optimization (IMRO), as a decoupling method, high accuracy failure probability calculation results can be obtained with relatively small calculation amount, and then optimization results can be obtained by IMRO and sequence optimization methods. First, a reliability analysis example is utilized to demonstrate the accuracy of the reliability analysis part of IMRO. Then, a set of nonlinear challenges and diverse engineering case studies were utilized to assess the algorithm's performance. The calculation results after comparison prove that IMRO is more accurate in dealing with nonlinear problems and engineering examples, and can better meet the requirements.
在基于可靠性的设计优化(RBDO)中,目标是通过在目标概率阈值下满足设计要求,开发出具有高可靠性特征的优化设计。可靠性优化的目标是通过关注评估和优化来获得优秀的算法。在RBDO中,由于评价方法的选择和可靠点方法的更新问题,往往无法以较少的计算量获得准确的失效概率结果,结果不准确,或者增加了计算量。基于积分的可靠性分析方法:超球面帽面积积分法(Hyperspherical cap area integral method, hcam)在计算负荷极低的情况下,可以达到接近MCS方法的精度,从而实现高效、精确的失效概率计算。因此,通过引入基于可靠性优化积分法(IMRO)的可靠性评估方法,作为一种解耦方法,可以用相对较小的计算量获得精度较高的失效概率计算结果,然后通过IMRO和序列优化方法获得优化结果。首先,通过可靠性分析实例验证了IMRO可靠性分析部分的准确性。然后,利用一组非线性挑战和不同的工程案例来评估算法的性能。经比较计算结果表明,IMRO在处理非线性问题和工程实例时精度更高,能较好地满足要求。
期刊介绍:
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering stands as a cornerstone in the realm of computational science and engineering. With a history spanning over five decades, the journal has been a key platform for disseminating papers on advanced mathematical modeling and numerical solutions. Interdisciplinary in nature, these contributions encompass mechanics, mathematics, computer science, and various scientific disciplines. The journal welcomes a broad range of computational methods addressing the simulation, analysis, and design of complex physical problems, making it a vital resource for researchers in the field.