Tissue classification from raw diffusion-weighted images using machine learning.

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1002/mp.17810
Guangyu Dan, Cui Feng, Zheng Zhong, Kaibao Sun, Ping-Shou Zhong, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li, Xiaohong Joe Zhou
{"title":"Tissue classification from raw diffusion-weighted images using machine learning.","authors":"Guangyu Dan, Cui Feng, Zheng Zhong, Kaibao Sun, Ping-Shou Zhong, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li, Xiaohong Joe Zhou","doi":"10.1002/mp.17810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), a large collection of diffusion models is available to provide insights into tissue characteristics. However, these models are limited by predefined assumptions and computational challenges, potentially hindering the full extraction of information from the diffusion MR signal.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed at developing a MOdel-free Diffusion-wEighted MRI (MODEM) method for tissue differentiation by using a machine learning (ML) algorithm based on raw diffusion images without relying on any specific diffusion model. MODEM has been applied to both simulation data and cervical cancer diffusion images and compared with several diffusion models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With Institutional Review Board approval, 54 cervical cancer patients (median age, 52 years; age range, 29-73 years) participated in the study, including 26 in the early FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage (IB, 16; IIA, 10) and 28 the late stage (IIB, 8; IIIB, 14; IIIC, 1; IVA, 3; IVB, 2). The participants underwent DWI with 17 b-values (0 to 4500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>) at 3 Tesla. Synthetic diffusion MRI signals were also generated using Monte-Carlo simulation with Gaussian noise doping under varying substrates. MODEM with multilayer perceptron and five diffusion models (mono-exponential, intra-voxel incoherent-motion, diffusion kurtosis imaging, fractional order calculus, and continuous-time-random-walk models) were employed to distinguish different substrates in the simulation data and differentiate different pathological states (i.e., normal vs. cancerous tissue; and early-stage vs. late-stage cancers) in the cervical cancer dataset. Accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy values between MODEM and the five diffusion models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the simulation dataset, MODEM produced a higher AUC and better accuracy, particularly in scenarios where the noise level exceeded 5%. For the cervical cancer dataset, MODEM yielded the highest AUC and accuracy in cervical cancer detection (AUC, 0.976; accuracy, 91.9%) and cervical cancer staging (AUC, 0.773; accuracy, 69.2%), significantly outperforming any of the diffusion models (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MODEM is useful for cervical cancer detection and staging and offers considerable advantages over analytical diffusion models for tissue characterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), a large collection of diffusion models is available to provide insights into tissue characteristics. However, these models are limited by predefined assumptions and computational challenges, potentially hindering the full extraction of information from the diffusion MR signal.

Purpose: This study aimed at developing a MOdel-free Diffusion-wEighted MRI (MODEM) method for tissue differentiation by using a machine learning (ML) algorithm based on raw diffusion images without relying on any specific diffusion model. MODEM has been applied to both simulation data and cervical cancer diffusion images and compared with several diffusion models.

Methods: With Institutional Review Board approval, 54 cervical cancer patients (median age, 52 years; age range, 29-73 years) participated in the study, including 26 in the early FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage (IB, 16; IIA, 10) and 28 the late stage (IIB, 8; IIIB, 14; IIIC, 1; IVA, 3; IVB, 2). The participants underwent DWI with 17 b-values (0 to 4500 s/mm2) at 3 Tesla. Synthetic diffusion MRI signals were also generated using Monte-Carlo simulation with Gaussian noise doping under varying substrates. MODEM with multilayer perceptron and five diffusion models (mono-exponential, intra-voxel incoherent-motion, diffusion kurtosis imaging, fractional order calculus, and continuous-time-random-walk models) were employed to distinguish different substrates in the simulation data and differentiate different pathological states (i.e., normal vs. cancerous tissue; and early-stage vs. late-stage cancers) in the cervical cancer dataset. Accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy values between MODEM and the five diffusion models.

Results: For the simulation dataset, MODEM produced a higher AUC and better accuracy, particularly in scenarios where the noise level exceeded 5%. For the cervical cancer dataset, MODEM yielded the highest AUC and accuracy in cervical cancer detection (AUC, 0.976; accuracy, 91.9%) and cervical cancer staging (AUC, 0.773; accuracy, 69.2%), significantly outperforming any of the diffusion models (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: MODEM is useful for cervical cancer detection and staging and offers considerable advantages over analytical diffusion models for tissue characterization.

使用机器学习从原始扩散加权图像中进行组织分类。
背景:在弥散加权成像(DWI)中,大量弥散模型可用于深入了解组织特征。然而,这些模型受到预定义假设和计算挑战的限制,可能会阻碍从扩散MR信号中充分提取信息。目的:本研究旨在利用基于原始扩散图像的机器学习(ML)算法,开发一种无模型的组织分化扩散加权MRI (MODEM)方法,而不依赖于任何特定的扩散模型。将调制解调器应用于模拟数据和宫颈癌扩散图像,并与几种扩散模型进行了比较。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,54例宫颈癌患者(中位年龄52岁;年龄29-73岁)参与研究,其中FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics)早期26例(IB, 16例;IIA, 10)和28晚期(IIB, 8;希望,14;IIIC, 1;IVA 3;IVB, 2)。参与者在3特斯拉下接受了17个b值(0到4500 s/mm2)的DWI。采用蒙特卡罗模拟方法,在不同衬底下掺杂高斯噪声,生成了合成扩散MRI信号。采用多层感知器的MODEM和五种扩散模型(单指数、体素内非相干运动、扩散峰度成像、分数阶微积分和连续时间随机游走模型)来区分模拟数据中的不同底物,并区分不同的病理状态(即正常与癌组织;早期癌症和晚期癌症的对比)。评估其准确度和受试者工作特征曲线下面积。采用Mann-Whitney u检验比较MODEM与5种扩散模型的曲线下面积(AUC)和精度值。结果:对于模拟数据集,MODEM产生了更高的AUC和更好的准确性,特别是在噪声水平超过5%的情况下。对于宫颈癌数据集,MODEM在宫颈癌检测中的AUC和准确率最高(AUC, 0.976;准确率,91.9%)和宫颈癌分期(AUC, 0.773;结论:调制解调器在宫颈癌的检测和分期中是有用的,并且在组织表征方面比分析扩散模型具有相当大的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信