Jason Silvestre, Sydney Seeger, Robert A Ravinsky, James P Lawrence, James D Kang, Charles A Reitman
{"title":"Factors Associated with Future Academic Faculty Appointment After Spine Surgery Fellowship Training.","authors":"Jason Silvestre, Sydney Seeger, Robert A Ravinsky, James P Lawrence, James D Kang, Charles A Reitman","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Understanding optimal training environments for future academic leaders is a topic of increasing interest in spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study determined the association between surgeon factors and future academic faculty appointment after spine surgery fellowship training.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study of spine surgery fellows in the United States (2016-2017 to 2022-2023).</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>N/A OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest was future academic faculty appointment, which was assigned if the spine surgeon was employed at a teaching hospital. Demographic, bibliometric, and training characteristics of spine surgery fellows were obtained.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between surgeon factors and future academic faculty appointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 654 spine surgery fellows and 243 were appointed to academic faculty positions (37.2%). There was no difference in the rate of future academic faculty appointment between male and female spine surgeons (36.7% vs 45.7%, P=0.368). Allopathic graduates were more likely to obtain academic faculty positions than osteopathic graduates (40.6% vs 12.5%, P<0.001). Compared to spine surgeons in private practice, spine surgeons in academic practice had more peer-reviewed publications during medical school (1 ± 3 vs 0 ± 2, P<0.001) and orthopaedic surgery residency training (5 ± 13 vs 3 ± 5, P<0.001). Several characteristics of spine surgery fellowship programs were associated with future academic faculty appointment including geographic region (P=0.013), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation status (P<0.001), and a greater volume of annual fellows (P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several factors were associated with future academic faculty appointment in spine surgery including higher scholarly output during medical school and orthopaedic residency. These data may ultimately help trainees and fellowship selection committees in spine surgery align on desired academic career objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background context: Understanding optimal training environments for future academic leaders is a topic of increasing interest in spine surgery.
Purpose: This study determined the association between surgeon factors and future academic faculty appointment after spine surgery fellowship training.
Study design/setting: This was a retrospective observational study of spine surgery fellows in the United States (2016-2017 to 2022-2023).
Patient sample: N/A OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest was future academic faculty appointment, which was assigned if the spine surgeon was employed at a teaching hospital. Demographic, bibliometric, and training characteristics of spine surgery fellows were obtained.
Methods: Bivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between surgeon factors and future academic faculty appointment.
Results: There were 654 spine surgery fellows and 243 were appointed to academic faculty positions (37.2%). There was no difference in the rate of future academic faculty appointment between male and female spine surgeons (36.7% vs 45.7%, P=0.368). Allopathic graduates were more likely to obtain academic faculty positions than osteopathic graduates (40.6% vs 12.5%, P<0.001). Compared to spine surgeons in private practice, spine surgeons in academic practice had more peer-reviewed publications during medical school (1 ± 3 vs 0 ± 2, P<0.001) and orthopaedic surgery residency training (5 ± 13 vs 3 ± 5, P<0.001). Several characteristics of spine surgery fellowship programs were associated with future academic faculty appointment including geographic region (P=0.013), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation status (P<0.001), and a greater volume of annual fellows (P=0.003).
Conclusions: Several factors were associated with future academic faculty appointment in spine surgery including higher scholarly output during medical school and orthopaedic residency. These data may ultimately help trainees and fellowship selection committees in spine surgery align on desired academic career objectives.
背景背景:了解未来学术领袖的最佳训练环境是脊柱外科日益关注的话题。目的:本研究确定外科医生因素与脊柱外科奖学金培训后未来学术教师任命之间的关系。研究设计/环境:这是一项针对美国脊柱外科研究员的回顾性观察性研究(2016-2017年至2022-2023年)。患者样本:无结局指标:主要结局指标为未来的学术教员任命,如果脊柱外科医生在教学医院工作,则分配。获得脊柱外科研究员的人口学、文献计量学和培训特征。方法:采用双变量分析来确定外科医生因素与未来学术教师任命之间的关系。结果:共有654名脊柱外科研究员,其中243人担任学术职务(37.2%)。男性和女性脊柱外科医生的未来学术教员任命率无差异(36.7%对45.7%,P=0.368)。对抗疗法毕业生比整骨疗法毕业生更有可能获得学术教职(40.6% vs 12.5%)。结论:几个因素与脊柱外科未来的学术教职任命有关,包括医学院和骨科住院医师期间更高的学术产出。这些数据可能最终帮助脊柱外科的受训者和奖学金选择委员会与期望的学术职业目标保持一致。
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.