Strategy of reduced port gastrostomy as a safe procedure for paediatric patients.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yousuke Gohda, Hiroo Uchida, Takahisa Tainaka, Wataru Sumida, Chiyoe Shirota, Satoshi Makita, Miwa Satomi, Akihiro Yasui, Daiki Kato, Takuya Maeda, Hiroki Ishii, Kazuki Ota, Yaohui Guo, Jiahui Liu, Akinari Hinoki
{"title":"Strategy of reduced port gastrostomy as a safe procedure for paediatric patients.","authors":"Yousuke Gohda, Hiroo Uchida, Takahisa Tainaka, Wataru Sumida, Chiyoe Shirota, Satoshi Makita, Miwa Satomi, Akihiro Yasui, Daiki Kato, Takuya Maeda, Hiroki Ishii, Kazuki Ota, Yaohui Guo, Jiahui Liu, Akinari Hinoki","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_218_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic gastrostomy has improved surgical and cosmetic outcomes. Our approach involves a strategy of reduced port surgery, wherein only the umbilicus and tube insertion site were incised, with an additional port inserted if manipulation is difficult. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of our reduced port gastrostomy strategy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The paediatric patients who underwent gastrostomy at our institution from July 2013 to March 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent reduced port gastrostomy and those who underwent multiport gastrostomy with or without fundoplication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 78 patients who underwent gastrostomy, 25 and 39 patients who underwent reduced port gastrostomy and multiport gastrostomy with or without fundoplication, respectively, were included. Five patients who underwent reduced port gastrostomy required an additional port. The operative time during gastrostomy was shorter in the multiport gastrostomy group (21.3 min vs. 17.2 min, P = 0.00). One splenic injury in the reduced port gastrostomy group and one split of the stomach in the multiport gastrostomy group occurred and were completely repaired intraoperatively. No patient required reoperation within 30 days after gastrostomy. Post-operative complications, such as infection with pus (1 vs. 2, P = 1.00), external leakage requiring nutritional management change or tube replacement (2 vs. 2, P = 0.64) and tube dislodgement (1 vs. 0, P = 0.39), were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strategy of reduced port gastrostomy was safe and cosmetically favourable compared with multiport gastrostomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_218_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic gastrostomy has improved surgical and cosmetic outcomes. Our approach involves a strategy of reduced port surgery, wherein only the umbilicus and tube insertion site were incised, with an additional port inserted if manipulation is difficult. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of our reduced port gastrostomy strategy.

Patients and methods: The paediatric patients who underwent gastrostomy at our institution from July 2013 to March 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent reduced port gastrostomy and those who underwent multiport gastrostomy with or without fundoplication.

Results: Of the 78 patients who underwent gastrostomy, 25 and 39 patients who underwent reduced port gastrostomy and multiport gastrostomy with or without fundoplication, respectively, were included. Five patients who underwent reduced port gastrostomy required an additional port. The operative time during gastrostomy was shorter in the multiport gastrostomy group (21.3 min vs. 17.2 min, P = 0.00). One splenic injury in the reduced port gastrostomy group and one split of the stomach in the multiport gastrostomy group occurred and were completely repaired intraoperatively. No patient required reoperation within 30 days after gastrostomy. Post-operative complications, such as infection with pus (1 vs. 2, P = 1.00), external leakage requiring nutritional management change or tube replacement (2 vs. 2, P = 0.64) and tube dislodgement (1 vs. 0, P = 0.39), were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions: The strategy of reduced port gastrostomy was safe and cosmetically favourable compared with multiport gastrostomy.

小口胃造口术作为儿科患者安全手术的策略。
背景:腹腔镜胃造口术改善了手术和美容效果。我们的方法包括减少端口手术策略,其中仅切开脐和管插入部位,如果操作困难,则插入额外的端口。本研究旨在探讨我们的缩小胃造口策略的结果。患者和方法:回顾性分析2013年7月至2023年3月在我院行胃造口术的儿科患者。手术结果比较了行小口胃造口术的患者和行多口胃造口术的患者,有或没有底叠术。结果:78例行胃造口术的患者中,分别有25例和39例分别行小口胃造口术和多口胃造口术,伴有或不伴有胃底吻合。5例接受小口胃造口术的患者需要增加一个口。多孔胃造口组手术时间较短(21.3 min vs. 17.2 min, P = 0.00)。缩小胃造口组1例脾损伤,多口胃造口组1例胃裂,术中全部修复。无患者在胃造口术后30天内再次手术。术后并发症,如脓感染(1 vs. 2, P = 1.00),需要改变营养管理或更换管的外漏(2 vs. 2, P = 0.64)和管移位(1 vs. 0, P = 0.39),两组之间相似。结论:与多口胃造口术相比,小口胃造口术安全、美观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信