Outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using tail-anchor mesh fixation method: A retrospective study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Li-Cheng Wang, Xian-Ping Zhou
{"title":"Outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using tail-anchor mesh fixation method: A retrospective study.","authors":"Li-Cheng Wang, Xian-Ping Zhou","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_214_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has become increasingly popular, but recurrence remains a concern. This study introduces a novel tail-anchor mesh (TAM) fixation method for LIHR and evaluates the safety, feasibility and clinical outcomes of this technique in patients undergoing LIHR.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between June 2018 and June 2020, 412 patients with inguinal hernias were included in the study. LIHR with the TAM method was performed in 210 patients (Group A), whereas 202 patients underwent LIHR with conventional mesh fixation (Group B). Statistical analysis was used to compare clinical data between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recurrence rate and incidence of seroma were significantly lower in Group A (0.48% and 1.90%, respectively) than in Group B (3.96% and 9.41%, respectively) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic indicators, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, hospital stay or patient costs (all P > 0.05). Follow-ups at 24 and 53 months after discharge revealed no cases of wound infection, chronic pain or testicular atrophy in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TAM fixation method is a safe, feasible and reproducible technique for LIHR and offers superior outcomes compared with conventional mesh fixation, particularly in reducing recurrence and seroma formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_214_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has become increasingly popular, but recurrence remains a concern. This study introduces a novel tail-anchor mesh (TAM) fixation method for LIHR and evaluates the safety, feasibility and clinical outcomes of this technique in patients undergoing LIHR.

Patients and methods: Between June 2018 and June 2020, 412 patients with inguinal hernias were included in the study. LIHR with the TAM method was performed in 210 patients (Group A), whereas 202 patients underwent LIHR with conventional mesh fixation (Group B). Statistical analysis was used to compare clinical data between the two groups.

Results: The recurrence rate and incidence of seroma were significantly lower in Group A (0.48% and 1.90%, respectively) than in Group B (3.96% and 9.41%, respectively) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic indicators, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, hospital stay or patient costs (all P > 0.05). Follow-ups at 24 and 53 months after discharge revealed no cases of wound infection, chronic pain or testicular atrophy in either group.

Conclusions: The TAM fixation method is a safe, feasible and reproducible technique for LIHR and offers superior outcomes compared with conventional mesh fixation, particularly in reducing recurrence and seroma formation.

腹腔镜腹股沟疝尾锚网固定修复效果的回顾性研究。
背景:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)越来越流行,但复发仍然是一个问题。本研究介绍了一种新型尾锚网(TAM)固定LIHR的方法,并评估了该技术在LIHR患者中的安全性、可行性和临床结果。患者和方法:2018年6月至2020年6月,412例腹股沟疝患者纳入研究。A组210例采用TAM方法进行LIHR, B组202例采用常规补片固定进行LIHR。对两组临床资料进行统计学分析比较。结果:A组血肿复发率(0.48%)、发生率(1.90%)明显低于B组(3.96%)、发生率(9.41%)(P < 0.05)。两组在人口学指标、术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、患者费用等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。出院后24和53个月随访,两组均未见伤口感染、慢性疼痛或睾丸萎缩。结论:TAM固定方法是一种安全、可行和可重复的治疗LIHR的技术,与传统的网状物固定相比,具有更好的效果,特别是在减少复发和血肿形成方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信