Reciprocal processes linking marital conflict and sibling relationship challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Oana Bucsea, David Flora, Dillon T Browne, Heather Prime
{"title":"Reciprocal processes linking marital conflict and sibling relationship challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Oana Bucsea, David Flora, Dillon T Browne, Heather Prime","doi":"10.1037/fam0001336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During times of stress, families are tasked with maintaining or reestablishing a state of equilibrium in order to cope with stress on the family system. The pandemic context represents an opportunity to study the interdependencies between family members and relationships under duress. The present study examined the transactional effects linking the marital and sibling subsystems throughout the early months of the pandemic. It was hypothesized that more marital conflict would predict more sibling relationship challenges, and vice versa, across the pandemic and that COVID-19 stress would moderate this relationship. Participants included 505 caregivers who reported on two children (sibling dyads) in the home at four time points (T1: May 2020; T2: July 2020; T3: September 2020; T4: November 2020). Caregivers reported on pandemic-related stress at T1, and marital conflict and sibling relationship challenges (conflict and lack of support) at T1-T4. Using a four-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel model, results showed that, on average, more marital conflict was related to more sibling relationship challenges (<i>p</i> < .001). However, negative cross-lagged effects linked marital and sibling relationship challenges throughout the pandemic, such that greater sibling challenges at T1 predicted less marital conflict at T2 (<i>p</i> = .04), which in turn predicted greater sibling relationship challenges at T3 (<i>p</i> = .03). Degree of pandemic-related stress did not moderate the cross-lagged effects between marital conflict and sibling relationship challenges (<i>p</i> = .22). Differential mechanisms linking sibling and marital functioning may account for stable between-family differences (i.e., spillover) as compared with within-family fluctuations over time (i.e., compensation). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During times of stress, families are tasked with maintaining or reestablishing a state of equilibrium in order to cope with stress on the family system. The pandemic context represents an opportunity to study the interdependencies between family members and relationships under duress. The present study examined the transactional effects linking the marital and sibling subsystems throughout the early months of the pandemic. It was hypothesized that more marital conflict would predict more sibling relationship challenges, and vice versa, across the pandemic and that COVID-19 stress would moderate this relationship. Participants included 505 caregivers who reported on two children (sibling dyads) in the home at four time points (T1: May 2020; T2: July 2020; T3: September 2020; T4: November 2020). Caregivers reported on pandemic-related stress at T1, and marital conflict and sibling relationship challenges (conflict and lack of support) at T1-T4. Using a four-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel model, results showed that, on average, more marital conflict was related to more sibling relationship challenges (p < .001). However, negative cross-lagged effects linked marital and sibling relationship challenges throughout the pandemic, such that greater sibling challenges at T1 predicted less marital conflict at T2 (p = .04), which in turn predicted greater sibling relationship challenges at T3 (p = .03). Degree of pandemic-related stress did not moderate the cross-lagged effects between marital conflict and sibling relationship challenges (p = .22). Differential mechanisms linking sibling and marital functioning may account for stable between-family differences (i.e., spillover) as compared with within-family fluctuations over time (i.e., compensation). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,将婚姻冲突与兄弟姐妹关系挑战联系起来的相互过程。
在紧张时期,家庭的任务是维持或重建一种平衡状态,以便应付对家庭制度的压力。大流行的背景为研究家庭成员之间的相互依赖关系和胁迫下的关系提供了机会。本研究考察了在大流行的最初几个月里,将婚姻和兄弟姐妹子系统联系起来的交易效应。据推测,在疫情期间,更多的婚姻冲突预示着更多的兄弟姐妹关系挑战,反之亦然,而COVID-19的压力会缓和这种关系。参与者包括505名看护人,他们在四个时间点(T1: 2020年5月;T2: 2020年7月;T3: 2020年9月;T4: 2020年11月)。照护者在第1- 4期报告了与流行病相关的压力,在第1- 4期报告了婚姻冲突和兄弟姐妹关系挑战(冲突和缺乏支持)。使用四波随机截距交叉滞后面板模型,结果显示,平均而言,更多的婚姻冲突与更多的兄弟姐妹关系挑战相关(p < 0.001)。然而,在整个大流行期间,负面的交叉滞后效应将婚姻和兄弟姐妹关系挑战联系起来,因此,T1时兄弟姐妹挑战越大,T2时婚姻冲突越少(p = 0.04),这反过来又预测T3时兄弟姐妹关系挑战越大(p = 0.03)。与流行病相关的压力程度并没有调节婚姻冲突和兄弟姐妹关系挑战之间的交叉滞后效应(p = 0.22)。与家庭内部随时间的波动(即补偿)相比,将兄弟姐妹和婚姻功能联系起来的不同机制可以解释家庭之间稳定的差异(即溢出)。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信