Graduate Students' Perspectives on Obtaining a Master's of Science in Respiratory Care.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Megan S Koster, Kristen L McHenry, Benjamin G Caldwell-Chadwick, Megan M Null
{"title":"Graduate Students' Perspectives on Obtaining a Master's of Science in Respiratory Care.","authors":"Megan S Koster, Kristen L McHenry, Benjamin G Caldwell-Chadwick, Megan M Null","doi":"10.1089/respcare.11570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There has been a push toward degree advancement throughout respiratory care (RC), with many academic institutions creating graduate-level programs. However, many practitioners are apprehensive about advancing their degrees past the entry-into-practice level. Little research exists regarding the benefits of a graduate-level degree in RC. <b>Methods:</b> A web-based survey was developed to identify the perceived benefits of completing a master's of science in RC (MSRC) program. Graduates from 7 MSRC programs were asked to identify how efficacious the program was in preparing them for new or expanded roles, what types of financial support were received, whether there exists a financial benefit to obtain the degree, and whether the degree supported professional advancement. Two hundred ninety-nine graduates were invited to complete the anonymous web-based survey. One hundred one surveys were initiated, and 98 (32.8%) responses were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-two percent of respondents indicated personal motivation for pursuing a graduate-level degree as well as a desire to stay in the field; 89% of respondents indicated that the program prepared them to assume new or expanded roles, and 58% had experienced advancement. Forty-five percent of respondents did not receive tuition reimbursement for degree advancement, and 88% did not receive any scholarship support toward the degree. Finally, graduates reported an average increase in salary of approximately $12,000. <b>Conclusions:</b> Attainment of a graduate-level RC degree through degree advancement remains reliant on intrinsic motivation. Although over half of respondents indicated receiving tuition support through an employer, opportunities continue to exist to increase financial support for clinicians to advance their education beyond the clinical requirements of licensure. Graduates indicated that earning the degree supported educational development, contributed to new or advanced roles, and contributed to a tangible increase in annual salary.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":"70 4","pages":"384-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.11570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been a push toward degree advancement throughout respiratory care (RC), with many academic institutions creating graduate-level programs. However, many practitioners are apprehensive about advancing their degrees past the entry-into-practice level. Little research exists regarding the benefits of a graduate-level degree in RC. Methods: A web-based survey was developed to identify the perceived benefits of completing a master's of science in RC (MSRC) program. Graduates from 7 MSRC programs were asked to identify how efficacious the program was in preparing them for new or expanded roles, what types of financial support were received, whether there exists a financial benefit to obtain the degree, and whether the degree supported professional advancement. Two hundred ninety-nine graduates were invited to complete the anonymous web-based survey. One hundred one surveys were initiated, and 98 (32.8%) responses were analyzed. Results: Seventy-two percent of respondents indicated personal motivation for pursuing a graduate-level degree as well as a desire to stay in the field; 89% of respondents indicated that the program prepared them to assume new or expanded roles, and 58% had experienced advancement. Forty-five percent of respondents did not receive tuition reimbursement for degree advancement, and 88% did not receive any scholarship support toward the degree. Finally, graduates reported an average increase in salary of approximately $12,000. Conclusions: Attainment of a graduate-level RC degree through degree advancement remains reliant on intrinsic motivation. Although over half of respondents indicated receiving tuition support through an employer, opportunities continue to exist to increase financial support for clinicians to advance their education beyond the clinical requirements of licensure. Graduates indicated that earning the degree supported educational development, contributed to new or advanced roles, and contributed to a tangible increase in annual salary.

研究生对获得呼吸护理硕士学位的看法。
背景:随着许多学术机构创建研究生水平的课程,整个呼吸护理(RC)一直在推动学位的进步。然而,许多从业人员担心他们的学位超过了入门级的实践水平。很少有关于RC研究生学位的好处的研究。方法:开发了一项基于网络的调查,以确定完成RC (MSRC)计划的科学硕士学位的感知好处。来自7个MSRC项目的毕业生被要求确定该项目在为他们准备新的或扩展的角色方面的有效性,收到了什么类型的经济支持,是否存在获得学位的经济利益,以及学位是否支持职业发展。299名毕业生被邀请完成这项匿名网络调查。共发起了101项调查,分析了98项(32.8%)回复。结果:72%的受访者表示追求研究生水平学位的个人动机以及留在该领域的愿望;89%的受访者表示,该计划为他们承担新的或扩大的角色做好了准备,58%的人获得了晋升。45%的受访者没有获得学位晋升的学费报销,88%的受访者没有获得任何奖学金支持。最后,毕业生报告的平均工资增长约为1.2万美元。结论:通过学位提升获得研究生水平的RC学位仍然依赖于内在动机。虽然超过一半的受访者表示通过雇主获得学费支持,但仍然有机会增加对临床医生的财政支持,以提高他们的教育水平,超出执照的临床要求。毕业生们表示,获得学位支持了教育发展,有助于获得新的或高级的职位,并有助于切实提高年薪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信