Prehospital Sepsis Recognition and Antibiotic Administration: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Peter Antevy, Kenneth A Scheppke, Charles Coyle, Sophie Tenenbaum, Grant Aran, Julia Leser, Nancy Burdett, David A Farcy, Tony Zitek
{"title":"Prehospital Sepsis Recognition and Antibiotic Administration: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Peter Antevy, Kenneth A Scheppke, Charles Coyle, Sophie Tenenbaum, Grant Aran, Julia Leser, Nancy Burdett, David A Farcy, Tony Zitek","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2489034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although earlier antibiotics are known to be beneficial in sepsis, very few emergency medical services (EMS) agencies have protocols for prehospital antibiotics for sepsis. Therefore, we sought to assess how well a large EMS agency that uses prehospital antibiotics for sepsis adheres to its sepsis protocol (when initiated), and to determine how soon antibiotics are typically given.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients identified as \"sepsis alerts\" by EMS clinicians from a single EMS system in Florida, USA. The prehospital sepsis protocol dictated that EMS clinicians initiate a \"sepsis alert\" if the patient had a suspected infection and at least 2 of the following 3 criteria based on the sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score: altered mental status, respiratory rate > 22 breaths per minute or end-tidal CO2 < 25 mmHg, or systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg. Per protocol, patients meeting sepsis criteria were supposed to receive intravenous ceftriaxone and intramuscular gentamicin. We reviewed the charts of sepsis alert patients to determine demographic information, clinical characteristics, sepsis protocol compliance, and when patients received antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024, there were 1308 patients for whom a prehospital sepsis alert was initiated. Median age was 80.0 years (IQR: 72 to 87.5), and 48.5% had hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg). Of the 1308 sepsis alert patients, review of documentation confirmed that 1301 (99.5%) had a suspected infection with at least 2 sepsis alert criteria. In total, 1264 (96.6%) received at least 1 antibiotic (either ceftriaxone or gentamicin) prior to hospital arrival. The median time from 9-1-1 call to first antibiotic administration was 26 minutes (IQR: 21 to 31 minutes). The first antibiotic was given a median of 11 minutes (IQR: 7 to 16 minutes) prior to hospital arrival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients in whom a sepsis alert was initiated, EMS clinicians adhered to the sepsis protocol and administered antibiotics prior to hospital arrival in 97% of cases. Patients received their first antibiotic a median of approximately 26 minutes after 9-1-1 call and 11 minutes prior to hospital arrival.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2489034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although earlier antibiotics are known to be beneficial in sepsis, very few emergency medical services (EMS) agencies have protocols for prehospital antibiotics for sepsis. Therefore, we sought to assess how well a large EMS agency that uses prehospital antibiotics for sepsis adheres to its sepsis protocol (when initiated), and to determine how soon antibiotics are typically given.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients identified as "sepsis alerts" by EMS clinicians from a single EMS system in Florida, USA. The prehospital sepsis protocol dictated that EMS clinicians initiate a "sepsis alert" if the patient had a suspected infection and at least 2 of the following 3 criteria based on the sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score: altered mental status, respiratory rate > 22 breaths per minute or end-tidal CO2 < 25 mmHg, or systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg. Per protocol, patients meeting sepsis criteria were supposed to receive intravenous ceftriaxone and intramuscular gentamicin. We reviewed the charts of sepsis alert patients to determine demographic information, clinical characteristics, sepsis protocol compliance, and when patients received antibiotics.

Results: Between June 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024, there were 1308 patients for whom a prehospital sepsis alert was initiated. Median age was 80.0 years (IQR: 72 to 87.5), and 48.5% had hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg). Of the 1308 sepsis alert patients, review of documentation confirmed that 1301 (99.5%) had a suspected infection with at least 2 sepsis alert criteria. In total, 1264 (96.6%) received at least 1 antibiotic (either ceftriaxone or gentamicin) prior to hospital arrival. The median time from 9-1-1 call to first antibiotic administration was 26 minutes (IQR: 21 to 31 minutes). The first antibiotic was given a median of 11 minutes (IQR: 7 to 16 minutes) prior to hospital arrival.

Conclusions: For patients in whom a sepsis alert was initiated, EMS clinicians adhered to the sepsis protocol and administered antibiotics prior to hospital arrival in 97% of cases. Patients received their first antibiotic a median of approximately 26 minutes after 9-1-1 call and 11 minutes prior to hospital arrival.

院前败血症识别与抗生素使用:回顾性分析。
目的:虽然已知早期抗生素对脓毒症有益,但很少有紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构有院前抗生素治疗脓毒症的方案。因此,我们试图评估一家使用院前抗生素治疗败血症的大型EMS机构是否遵守其败血症方案(在启动时),并确定通常多久给予抗生素。方法:我们对来自美国佛罗里达州单一EMS系统的EMS临床医生确定为“脓毒症警报”的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。院前败血症方案规定,如果患者有疑似感染,并且根据顺序(败血症相关)器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分,EMS临床医生至少有以下3个标准中的2个,则启动“败血症警报”:精神状态改变、呼吸频率bbb22次/分钟或潮末二氧化碳。结果:在2023年6月1日至2024年6月30日期间,有1308名患者启动了院前败血症警报。中位年龄为80.0岁(IQR: 72 ~ 87.5), 48.5%患有低血压(收缩压< 100 mmHg)。在1308例败血症警报患者中,文献回顾证实1301例(99.5%)至少有2项败血症警报标准的疑似感染。总共有1264例(96.6%)患者在到达医院前接受了至少一种抗生素(头孢曲松或庆大霉素)。从9-1-1呼叫到第一次给药的中位时间为26分钟(IQR: 21至31分钟)。在到达医院前11分钟(IQR: 7至16分钟)给予第一种抗生素。结论:对于启动败血症警报的患者,EMS临床医生在97%的病例中遵守败血症方案并在到达医院前给予抗生素治疗。患者在拨打911电话后约26分钟和到达医院前11分钟接受第一次抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信