Effect of osteoporosis medications on vascular and valvular calcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hui Zhen Lo, Kevin Leow, Rachael Hii, Nitesh Nerlekar, Peter R Ebeling, Alexander J Rodríguez
{"title":"Effect of osteoporosis medications on vascular and valvular calcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hui Zhen Lo, Kevin Leow, Rachael Hii, Nitesh Nerlekar, Peter R Ebeling, Alexander J Rodríguez","doi":"10.1007/s00198-025-07468-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vascular calcification shares many features with skeletal mineralisation and shares an inverse relationship with osteoporosis (skeletal de-mineralisation). However, medications that reduce bone loss (anti-resorptives) have had inconsistent effects on extra-skeletal mineralisation (i.e. vascular and valvular calcification). As such, this paper aims to synthesise existing literature examining the effect of anti-resorptive treatments on extra-skeletal (vascular and valvular) calcification across populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline and Embase were searched (inception to October 2024) for studies that assessed the association between anti-resorptive medication use and vascular/valvular calcification. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all outcomes, using random-effects model. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed for internal validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4071 articles screened, 33 were included in the review, and 15 (2344 participants) had data available for meta-analysis. Anti-resorptive use was associated with non-significant, small magnitude improvements in abdominal aortic calcification (decreased value), coronary artery calcification (decreased value) and ejection fraction (increased value) but significant small reduction in aortic valve area (representing less calcification on the valve) with standardised mean difference of - 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.99; 0.08, I<sup>2</sup> = 84%), - 1.19 (95% CI - 2.92; 0.55, I<sup>2</sup> = 91%), - 0.67 (95% CI - 1.72; 0.38, I<sup>2</sup> = 94%), 0.26 (95% CI - 0.14; 0.66, I<sup>2</sup> = 62%) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.07; 1.06, I<sup>2</sup> = 76%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significance of small positive effect of anti-resorptives on aortic stenosis is clinically uncertain. Despite strong biological links between vascular calcification and skeletal mineralisation, anti-resorptives do not appear to have a strong favourable influence on extra-skeletal mineralisation. This suggests that mechanisms that link vascular calcification with osteoporosis may be acting in pathways not influenced by anti-resorptives. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the effect of anti-resorptives on vascular and valvular calcification. There is a small, positive effect of anti-resorptives on aortic stenosis, though this is of uncertain clinical importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-025-07468-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vascular calcification shares many features with skeletal mineralisation and shares an inverse relationship with osteoporosis (skeletal de-mineralisation). However, medications that reduce bone loss (anti-resorptives) have had inconsistent effects on extra-skeletal mineralisation (i.e. vascular and valvular calcification). As such, this paper aims to synthesise existing literature examining the effect of anti-resorptive treatments on extra-skeletal (vascular and valvular) calcification across populations.

Methods: Medline and Embase were searched (inception to October 2024) for studies that assessed the association between anti-resorptive medication use and vascular/valvular calcification. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all outcomes, using random-effects model. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed for internal validity.

Results: Of 4071 articles screened, 33 were included in the review, and 15 (2344 participants) had data available for meta-analysis. Anti-resorptive use was associated with non-significant, small magnitude improvements in abdominal aortic calcification (decreased value), coronary artery calcification (decreased value) and ejection fraction (increased value) but significant small reduction in aortic valve area (representing less calcification on the valve) with standardised mean difference of - 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.99; 0.08, I2 = 84%), - 1.19 (95% CI - 2.92; 0.55, I2 = 91%), - 0.67 (95% CI - 1.72; 0.38, I2 = 94%), 0.26 (95% CI - 0.14; 0.66, I2 = 62%) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.07; 1.06, I2 = 76%), respectively.

Conclusion: The significance of small positive effect of anti-resorptives on aortic stenosis is clinically uncertain. Despite strong biological links between vascular calcification and skeletal mineralisation, anti-resorptives do not appear to have a strong favourable influence on extra-skeletal mineralisation. This suggests that mechanisms that link vascular calcification with osteoporosis may be acting in pathways not influenced by anti-resorptives. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the effect of anti-resorptives on vascular and valvular calcification. There is a small, positive effect of anti-resorptives on aortic stenosis, though this is of uncertain clinical importance.

骨质疏松症药物对血管和瓣膜钙化的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:血管钙化与骨骼矿化有许多共同之处,并且与骨质疏松症(骨骼脱钙)呈反向关系。然而,减少骨质流失的药物(抗骨吸收药)对骨骼外矿化(即血管和瓣膜钙化)的影响并不一致。因此,本文旨在综合现有文献,研究抗骨质吸收治疗对不同人群骨骼外(血管和瓣膜)钙化的影响:检索了 Medline 和 Embase(起始时间至 2024 年 10 月)中评估抗骨质吸收药物使用与血管/瓣膜钙化之间关系的研究。采用随机效应模型计算了所有结果的汇总标准化均值差异(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)。为保证内部有效性,还进行了剔除敏感性分析:在筛选出的 4071 篇文章中,有 33 篇被纳入综述,其中 15 篇(2344 名参与者)的数据可用于荟萃分析。抗还原剂的使用与腹主动脉钙化(数值减少)、冠状动脉钙化(数值减少)和射血分数(数值增加)的非显著性小幅改善有关,但与主动脉瓣面积的显著性小幅减少(代表瓣膜上的钙化减少)有关,标准化平均差为-0.45(95% 置信区间 (CI) - 0.99; 0.08,I2 = 84%)、- 1.19(95% CI - 2.92; 0.55,I2 = 91%)、- 0.67(95% CI - 1.72; 0.38,I2 = 94%)、0.26(95% CI - 0.14; 0.66,I2 = 62%)和 0.56(95% CI 0.07; 1.06,I2 = 76%):抗还原剂对主动脉瓣狭窄的微小积极影响在临床上的意义尚不确定。尽管血管钙化与骨骼矿化之间存在着密切的生物学联系,但抗骨质吸收剂似乎对骨骼外矿化并无明显的有利影响。这表明,将血管钙化与骨质疏松症联系起来的机制可能是不受抗骨吸收剂影响的途径。本系统综述和荟萃分析总结了抗骨质吸收剂对血管和瓣膜钙化的影响。抗还原剂对主动脉瓣狭窄有微小的积极影响,但其临床重要性尚不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信