Andeulazia Murdock, Cleo Whiting, Sara Abdel Azim, Savanna I Vidal, Nikita Menta, Brindley Brooks, Adam Friedman
{"title":"The State of the Clinical Management Union: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Persons With Hidradenitis Suppurativa.","authors":"Andeulazia Murdock, Cleo Whiting, Sara Abdel Azim, Savanna I Vidal, Nikita Menta, Brindley Brooks, Adam Friedman","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic autoinflammatory condition notable for a high psychosocial burden on patients. This burden is theorized to be linked to patient dissatisfaction due to the paucity of treatment options.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed respondent perceptions of current and emerging HS treatments and their impact on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-exempt (IRB#: NCR235179) survey was distributed via the HSconnect.org listserv for respondents ≥18 years old. Of 501 responses, 423 (84.4%) completed the entire survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less than 20% of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with current treatment options (76/423). Of respondents with self-reported disease severity of Hurley stage II or III (51%, 244/483), only 39% were being treated with biologics and/or 26% hormone therapy, indicating undertreatment per current HS guidelines. Most respondents (74%) were unaware of Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments and 56% reported that their dermatologist or healthcare provider had not discussed these options with them. More than half of respondents (60%, 254/423) felt it was important to have FDA-approved therapies, believing it would lead to improved physical health (86%), mental health (78%), and/or personal relationships (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large cross-sectional survey of patients with HS, dissatisfaction with current treatment options was expressed by a minority of respondents and likely results from both undertreatment and gaps in knowledge of current FDA-approved therapies. Enhancing patient-provider education about off-label and FDA-approved therapies, including established and emerging treatment options, guidelines for use, and their adverse effects, can dramatically improve the quality of life for persons living with HS. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(4):381-385. doi:10.36849/JDD.8867.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":"24 4","pages":"381-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic autoinflammatory condition notable for a high psychosocial burden on patients. This burden is theorized to be linked to patient dissatisfaction due to the paucity of treatment options.
Objectives: This study assessed respondent perceptions of current and emerging HS treatments and their impact on quality of life.
Methods: An IRB-exempt (IRB#: NCR235179) survey was distributed via the HSconnect.org listserv for respondents ≥18 years old. Of 501 responses, 423 (84.4%) completed the entire survey.
Results: Less than 20% of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with current treatment options (76/423). Of respondents with self-reported disease severity of Hurley stage II or III (51%, 244/483), only 39% were being treated with biologics and/or 26% hormone therapy, indicating undertreatment per current HS guidelines. Most respondents (74%) were unaware of Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments and 56% reported that their dermatologist or healthcare provider had not discussed these options with them. More than half of respondents (60%, 254/423) felt it was important to have FDA-approved therapies, believing it would lead to improved physical health (86%), mental health (78%), and/or personal relationships (60%).
Conclusions: In a large cross-sectional survey of patients with HS, dissatisfaction with current treatment options was expressed by a minority of respondents and likely results from both undertreatment and gaps in knowledge of current FDA-approved therapies. Enhancing patient-provider education about off-label and FDA-approved therapies, including established and emerging treatment options, guidelines for use, and their adverse effects, can dramatically improve the quality of life for persons living with HS. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(4):381-385. doi:10.36849/JDD.8867.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology.
We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality.
Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.