Social determinants of health and intensive care unit admission rates and outcomes for children, Australia, 2013-2020: analysis of national registry data.
Katie M Moynihan, Vanessa Russ, Darren Clinch, Lahn Straney, Johnny Millar, Marino Festa, Natasha Nassar, Shreerupa Basu, Thavani Thavarajasingam, Debbie Long, Paul J Secombe, Anthony J Slater
{"title":"Social determinants of health and intensive care unit admission rates and outcomes for children, Australia, 2013-2020: analysis of national registry data.","authors":"Katie M Moynihan, Vanessa Russ, Darren Clinch, Lahn Straney, Johnny Millar, Marino Festa, Natasha Nassar, Shreerupa Basu, Thavani Thavarajasingam, Debbie Long, Paul J Secombe, Anthony J Slater","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the influence of non-medical social determinants of health on rates of admission and outcomes for children admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study; analysis of Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry data.</p><p><strong>Setting, participants: </strong>Children (18 years or younger) admitted to Australian ICUs during 1 January 2013 - 31 December 2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Population-standardised ICU admission rates, overall and by residential socio-economic status (Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage [IRSD] quintile) and Indigenous status; likelihood of mortality in the ICU by residential socio-economic status (continuous, and quintile 1 v quintiles 2-5) and Indigenous status, adjusted for pre-illness, admission, and ICU and hospital factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for 77 233 ICU admissions of children were available. The ICU admission rate for Indigenous children was 1.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87-1.94), for non-Indigenous children 1.60 (95% CI, 1.57-1.64) per 1000 children per year. The rate was higher for children living in areas in the lowest IRSD quintile (1.93; [95% CI, 1.89-1.96]) than for those living in quintile 5 (1.26 [95% CI, 1.23-1.29] per 1000 children per year). Unadjusted in-ICU mortality was higher for Indigenous than non-Indigenous children (2.5% v 2.1%) and also for children living in the lowest IRSD quintile than in quintiles 2-5 (2.5% v 2.0%). After adjustment for all factors, mortality among Indigenous children was similar to that for non-Indigenous children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.92-1.43); it was higher for children living in the lowest IRSD quintile than for those living in quintiles 2-5 (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.36). Remoteness and distance between home and ICU did not influence the likelihood of death in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The population-standardised ICU admission rate is higher for Indigenous children and children residing in areas of greatest socio-economic disadvantage than for other children in Australia. Adjusted in-ICU mortality was higher for children from areas of greatest socio-economic disadvantage. Advancing health equity will require further investigation of the reasons for these differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the influence of non-medical social determinants of health on rates of admission and outcomes for children admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry data.
Setting, participants: Children (18 years or younger) admitted to Australian ICUs during 1 January 2013 - 31 December 2020.
Main outcome measures: Population-standardised ICU admission rates, overall and by residential socio-economic status (Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage [IRSD] quintile) and Indigenous status; likelihood of mortality in the ICU by residential socio-economic status (continuous, and quintile 1 v quintiles 2-5) and Indigenous status, adjusted for pre-illness, admission, and ICU and hospital factors.
Results: Data for 77 233 ICU admissions of children were available. The ICU admission rate for Indigenous children was 1.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87-1.94), for non-Indigenous children 1.60 (95% CI, 1.57-1.64) per 1000 children per year. The rate was higher for children living in areas in the lowest IRSD quintile (1.93; [95% CI, 1.89-1.96]) than for those living in quintile 5 (1.26 [95% CI, 1.23-1.29] per 1000 children per year). Unadjusted in-ICU mortality was higher for Indigenous than non-Indigenous children (2.5% v 2.1%) and also for children living in the lowest IRSD quintile than in quintiles 2-5 (2.5% v 2.0%). After adjustment for all factors, mortality among Indigenous children was similar to that for non-Indigenous children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.92-1.43); it was higher for children living in the lowest IRSD quintile than for those living in quintiles 2-5 (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.36). Remoteness and distance between home and ICU did not influence the likelihood of death in the ICU.
Conclusions: The population-standardised ICU admission rate is higher for Indigenous children and children residing in areas of greatest socio-economic disadvantage than for other children in Australia. Adjusted in-ICU mortality was higher for children from areas of greatest socio-economic disadvantage. Advancing health equity will require further investigation of the reasons for these differences.
期刊介绍:
The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.