{"title":"Challenges in the identification and quantitation in on-line breath analysis.","authors":"Timon Käser, Stamatios Giannoukos, Renato Zenobi","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/adc9da","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification and quantitation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled human breath has attracted considerable interest due to its potential application in medical diagnostics, environmental exposure assessment, and forensic applications. Secondary electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (SESI-MS) is a method capable of detecting thousands of VOCs. Nevertheless, most studies using SESI-MS for breath analysis have relied primarily on MS<sup>1</sup>measurements for identifications and quantification, which are susceptible to misassignments and errors. In this study, we targeted several endogenous compounds (C5 to C10 aldehydes, limonene and pyridine), known to occur in breath. These compounds were measured and quantified in exhaled breath from 12 volunteers over several days using three different acquisition methods: full scan, targeted selected ion monitoring and parallel reaction monitoring. These methods were used for identification and quantification by comparing with measurements of external standards. High-abundance features such as limonene and pyridine were successfully identified and quantified in exhaled human breath with all three methods, with MS<sup>2</sup>measurements supporting identification, albeit with limitations to separate between limonene and<i>α</i>-/<i>β</i>-pinene. For low-abundance features, the study highlights the challenges of false assignments in SESI-MS, even with MS<sup>2</sup>measurements. This was demonstrated in the case of aldehydes, which could not be reliably separated from isomeric ketones present in breath, leading to incorrect quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/adc9da","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The identification and quantitation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled human breath has attracted considerable interest due to its potential application in medical diagnostics, environmental exposure assessment, and forensic applications. Secondary electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (SESI-MS) is a method capable of detecting thousands of VOCs. Nevertheless, most studies using SESI-MS for breath analysis have relied primarily on MS1measurements for identifications and quantification, which are susceptible to misassignments and errors. In this study, we targeted several endogenous compounds (C5 to C10 aldehydes, limonene and pyridine), known to occur in breath. These compounds were measured and quantified in exhaled breath from 12 volunteers over several days using three different acquisition methods: full scan, targeted selected ion monitoring and parallel reaction monitoring. These methods were used for identification and quantification by comparing with measurements of external standards. High-abundance features such as limonene and pyridine were successfully identified and quantified in exhaled human breath with all three methods, with MS2measurements supporting identification, albeit with limitations to separate between limonene andα-/β-pinene. For low-abundance features, the study highlights the challenges of false assignments in SESI-MS, even with MS2measurements. This was demonstrated in the case of aldehydes, which could not be reliably separated from isomeric ketones present in breath, leading to incorrect quantification.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics.
Typical areas of interest include:
Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research.
Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments.
Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway.
Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies.
Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications.
Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.