Log file-based quality assurance method for respiratory gating system.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wonjoong Cheon, Young Kyu Lee, Yunji Seol, Chan-Beom Park, Hong Qi Tan, Kyu Hye Choi, Young-Nam Kang, Byung Ock Choi
{"title":"Log file-based quality assurance method for respiratory gating system.","authors":"Wonjoong Cheon, Young Kyu Lee, Yunji Seol, Chan-Beom Park, Hong Qi Tan, Kyu Hye Choi, Young-Nam Kang, Byung Ock Choi","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As medical linear accelerator technology advances, enabling higher dose rate deliveries, hypofractionation regimens has increased. This necessitates respiratory gating systems that synchronize radiation delivery with tumor position, requiring simple rigorous quality assurance (QA) to ensure treatment accuracy and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to propose log-based QA for respiratory-gated radiation therapy using the respiratory gating system and treatment machine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>4D CT scans were performed with a Varian motion phantom using a Varian Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC). A treatment plan using 25%-75% respiratory phases with 100 MU was created and delivered to a solid water phantom. Treatment logs containing respiratory signals, beam on/off flags, and frame information were extracted from the treatment planning system's offline review. Log file analyses were conducted using in-house softwares to assess temporal synchronization between respiratory phases and beam triggers. Output measurements using a calibrated ion chamber (FC65G) were performed to evaluate dosimetric accuracy. Additionally, EPID images were acquired in cine mode and analyzed frame-by-frame to independently verify beam delivery timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Log file analysis revealed precise temporal synchronization, with mean time differences of 0.03 s ± 0.05 s between the planned 25% phase and beam-on, and -0.04 s ± 0.05 s between 75% phase and beam-off. The log-derived beam-on duration (2.61 s ± 0.02 s) closely matched the planned duration (2.66 s ± 0.00 s). Three-month log data showed consistent temporal accuracy, with trigger-on times remaining stable at 2.60 s ± 0.01 s across all measurements. Supporting ion chamber measurements confirmed dosimetric agreement between gating and non-gating modes (difference: 0.05 cGy ± 0.09 cGy) CONCLUSIONS: The proposed log file-based QA method demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility in assessing respiratory gating performance. This approach provides an efficient, objective method for standardizing QA procedures in respiratory-gated radiation therapy, enhancing treatment accuracy and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As medical linear accelerator technology advances, enabling higher dose rate deliveries, hypofractionation regimens has increased. This necessitates respiratory gating systems that synchronize radiation delivery with tumor position, requiring simple rigorous quality assurance (QA) to ensure treatment accuracy and patient safety.

Purpose: This study aimed to propose log-based QA for respiratory-gated radiation therapy using the respiratory gating system and treatment machine.

Methods: 4D CT scans were performed with a Varian motion phantom using a Varian Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC). A treatment plan using 25%-75% respiratory phases with 100 MU was created and delivered to a solid water phantom. Treatment logs containing respiratory signals, beam on/off flags, and frame information were extracted from the treatment planning system's offline review. Log file analyses were conducted using in-house softwares to assess temporal synchronization between respiratory phases and beam triggers. Output measurements using a calibrated ion chamber (FC65G) were performed to evaluate dosimetric accuracy. Additionally, EPID images were acquired in cine mode and analyzed frame-by-frame to independently verify beam delivery timing.

Results: Log file analysis revealed precise temporal synchronization, with mean time differences of 0.03 s ± 0.05 s between the planned 25% phase and beam-on, and -0.04 s ± 0.05 s between 75% phase and beam-off. The log-derived beam-on duration (2.61 s ± 0.02 s) closely matched the planned duration (2.66 s ± 0.00 s). Three-month log data showed consistent temporal accuracy, with trigger-on times remaining stable at 2.60 s ± 0.01 s across all measurements. Supporting ion chamber measurements confirmed dosimetric agreement between gating and non-gating modes (difference: 0.05 cGy ± 0.09 cGy) CONCLUSIONS: The proposed log file-based QA method demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility in assessing respiratory gating performance. This approach provides an efficient, objective method for standardizing QA procedures in respiratory-gated radiation therapy, enhancing treatment accuracy and patient safety.

基于日志文件的呼吸门控系统质量保证方法。
背景:随着医学直线加速器技术的进步,使更高剂量率的递送成为可能,低分割方案有所增加。这就需要呼吸门控系统,使放射传输与肿瘤位置同步,需要简单严格的质量保证(QA)来确保治疗的准确性和患者的安全。目的:本研究旨在利用呼吸门控系统和治疗机为呼吸门控放射治疗提供基于日志的质量保证。方法:使用瓦里安呼吸门控扫描仪(RGSC)对患者进行4D CT扫描。采用25%-75%的呼吸相和100 MU的治疗方案,并将其传递给固体水模体。治疗日志包含呼吸信号、波束开/关标志和帧信息,从治疗计划系统的离线审查中提取。使用内部软件进行日志文件分析,以评估呼吸期和波束触发之间的时间同步。使用校准的离子室(FC65G)进行输出测量,以评估剂量学的准确性。此外,在电影模式下获取EPID图像并逐帧分析以独立验证光束传输时间。结果:日志文件分析显示了精确的时间同步,计划的25%相位与波束的平均时差为0.03 s±0.05 s, 75%相位与波束的平均时差为-0.04 s±0.05 s。log-derived波束的持续时间(2.61 s±0.02 s)与计划的持续时间(2.66 s±0.00 s)非常接近。三个月的log数据显示了一致的时间准确性,在所有测量中,触发时间保持稳定在2.60 s±0.01 s。支持离子室测量证实了门控和非门控模式之间的剂量学一致性(差异:0.05 cGy±0.09 cGy)结论:所提出的基于日志文件的QA方法在评估呼吸门控性能方面具有较高的准确性和重复性。该方法为标准化呼吸门控放射治疗的质量保证程序,提高治疗准确性和患者安全性提供了一种高效、客观的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信