Single versus two-level superficial parasternal intercostal plane block: cadaveric evaluation of injectate spread with needle tip position on anterior surface of costal cartilage.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jon Christensen, Matthew Ritter, Rachel Douglas, Punnose Kattil, Nirusha Lachman, William J Mauermann
{"title":"Single versus two-level superficial parasternal intercostal plane block: cadaveric evaluation of injectate spread with needle tip position on anterior surface of costal cartilage.","authors":"Jon Christensen, Matthew Ritter, Rachel Douglas, Punnose Kattil, Nirusha Lachman, William J Mauermann","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks have grown in clinical use for cardiac surgery as a targeted fascial plane block for median sternotomy. Despite this, there remains no consensus on technique for optimal parasternal spread of injectate. The primary objective of this cadaveric study was to evaluate parasternal spread of injectate of single versus two-level superficial parasternal intercostal plane injections with the needle tip positioned on the anterior surface of the costal cartilage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed 10 single-level injections at T4 and 10 two-level injections at T3 and T5 on alternating sides in 10 fresh frozen cadavers. All injections were ultrasound guided with a parasagittal ultrasound probe orientation and an in-plane needle orientation. Anatomic dissections were performed immediately following injections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parasternal spread of injectate was greater with two-level injections at T3 and T5 costal cartilages than with single-level injections at the T4 costal cartilage, with two-level injections consistently spreading to the T2-T5 intercostal spaces. Median (Q1, Q3) intercostal space spread for single-level injections was 2.0 (2.0-2.5). Median (Q1, Q3) intercostal space spread for two-level injections was 4.0 (4.0-4.375).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-level injections with the needle tip located on the anterior surface of the costal cartilage resulted in improved parasternal spread compared with single-level injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks have grown in clinical use for cardiac surgery as a targeted fascial plane block for median sternotomy. Despite this, there remains no consensus on technique for optimal parasternal spread of injectate. The primary objective of this cadaveric study was to evaluate parasternal spread of injectate of single versus two-level superficial parasternal intercostal plane injections with the needle tip positioned on the anterior surface of the costal cartilage.

Methods: We performed 10 single-level injections at T4 and 10 two-level injections at T3 and T5 on alternating sides in 10 fresh frozen cadavers. All injections were ultrasound guided with a parasagittal ultrasound probe orientation and an in-plane needle orientation. Anatomic dissections were performed immediately following injections.

Results: Parasternal spread of injectate was greater with two-level injections at T3 and T5 costal cartilages than with single-level injections at the T4 costal cartilage, with two-level injections consistently spreading to the T2-T5 intercostal spaces. Median (Q1, Q3) intercostal space spread for single-level injections was 2.0 (2.0-2.5). Median (Q1, Q3) intercostal space spread for two-level injections was 4.0 (4.0-4.375).

Conclusions: Two-level injections with the needle tip located on the anterior surface of the costal cartilage resulted in improved parasternal spread compared with single-level injections.

简介:浅胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞作为胸骨正中切开术的目标筋膜平面阻滞,在心脏手术中的临床应用越来越广泛。尽管如此,对于注射剂的最佳胸骨旁扩散技术仍未达成共识。这项尸体研究的主要目的是评估针尖位于肋软骨前表面的单层胸骨旁肋间浅层注射与两层胸骨旁肋间浅层注射的注射液胸骨旁扩散情况:我们在 10 具新鲜冷冻尸体上交替进行了 10 次单层注射(T4)和 10 次双层注射(T3 和 T5)。所有注射均在超声引导下进行,超声探头方向为矢状面,针头方向为平面内。注射后立即进行解剖:结果:在T3和T5肋软骨处进行两级注射时,注射剂的胸骨旁扩散比在T4肋软骨处进行单级注射时更大,两级注射一直扩散到T2-T5肋间。单层注射的肋间隙扩散中位数(Q1、Q3)为 2.0(2.0-2.5)。两级注射的肋间隙扩散中位数(Q1,Q3)为 4.0(4.0-4.375):与单层注射相比,针尖位于肋软骨前表面的两层注射可改善胸骨旁扩散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信