Post-Intensive Care Syndrome and Caregiver Burden: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Soojung Ahn, Marianna LaNoue, Han Su, Amanda C Moale, Leslie P Scheunemann, Amy L Kiehl, Ivor S Douglas, Matthew C Exline, Michelle N Gong, Babar A Khan, Robert L Owens, Margaret A Pisani, Peter Rock, James C Jackson, E Wesley Ely, Timothy D Girard, Leanne M Boehm
{"title":"Post-Intensive Care Syndrome and Caregiver Burden: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Soojung Ahn, Marianna LaNoue, Han Su, Amanda C Moale, Leslie P Scheunemann, Amy L Kiehl, Ivor S Douglas, Matthew C Exline, Michelle N Gong, Babar A Khan, Robert L Owens, Margaret A Pisani, Peter Rock, James C Jackson, E Wesley Ely, Timothy D Girard, Leanne M Boehm","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding the reciprocal association between post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and caregiver burden is crucial for optimal care of patients and caregivers following critical illness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the associations between patient post-intensive care impairments and caregiver burden.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This secondary analysis of the MIND-USA study, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, which enrolled patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) from 16 academic medical centers across the US (December 2011 to August 2017), included 148 patient-caregiver dyads. Patients were adults aged 18 years or older with ICU delirium randomized to receive haloperidol, ziprasidone, or placebo. A caregiver who provided unpaid assistance to the patient was identified at enrollment. PICS and caregiver burden were assessed at 3 months and 12 months after randomization. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2023 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>ICU survivors were assessed for PICS domains, including physical and cognitive function, and posttraumatic stress disorder using the Katz Activities of Daily Living, the Functional Activities Questionnaire, the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian version, respectively. Caregiver burden was assessed using the Zarit Burden Interview. The associations between patient PICS and caregiver burden at 3 and 12 months were examined using structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 148 patients included in this study with a median (IQR) age of 58 (48-65) years, the majority identified as male (79 patients [53.4%]), and there were 16 (10.8%) Black, 139 (93.9%) non-Hispanic, and 127 (85.8%) White patients. PICS and caregiver burden at 3-month follow-up was positively associated with these outcomes at 12-month follow-up (PICS: β = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.88; P < .001; caregiver burden: β = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.82; P < .001). However, contrary to the study hypotheses, significant associations between 3-month PICS and 12-month caregiver burden and between 3-month caregiver burden and 12-month PICS were not observed (PICS→caregiver burden: β = 0.82; 95% CI, -0.02 to 1.66; P = .09; caregiver burden→PICS: β = 0.00; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03; P = .95). There was significant covariance between PICS and caregiver burden at each time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of ICU survivors and their caregivers, patient PICS and caregiver burden were associated at concurrent time points but were not associated with each other longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01211522.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e253443"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the reciprocal association between post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and caregiver burden is crucial for optimal care of patients and caregivers following critical illness.

Objective: To evaluate the associations between patient post-intensive care impairments and caregiver burden.

Design, setting, and participants: This secondary analysis of the MIND-USA study, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, which enrolled patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) from 16 academic medical centers across the US (December 2011 to August 2017), included 148 patient-caregiver dyads. Patients were adults aged 18 years or older with ICU delirium randomized to receive haloperidol, ziprasidone, or placebo. A caregiver who provided unpaid assistance to the patient was identified at enrollment. PICS and caregiver burden were assessed at 3 months and 12 months after randomization. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2023 to April 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: ICU survivors were assessed for PICS domains, including physical and cognitive function, and posttraumatic stress disorder using the Katz Activities of Daily Living, the Functional Activities Questionnaire, the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian version, respectively. Caregiver burden was assessed using the Zarit Burden Interview. The associations between patient PICS and caregiver burden at 3 and 12 months were examined using structural equation modeling.

Results: Of 148 patients included in this study with a median (IQR) age of 58 (48-65) years, the majority identified as male (79 patients [53.4%]), and there were 16 (10.8%) Black, 139 (93.9%) non-Hispanic, and 127 (85.8%) White patients. PICS and caregiver burden at 3-month follow-up was positively associated with these outcomes at 12-month follow-up (PICS: β = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.88; P < .001; caregiver burden: β = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.82; P < .001). However, contrary to the study hypotheses, significant associations between 3-month PICS and 12-month caregiver burden and between 3-month caregiver burden and 12-month PICS were not observed (PICS→caregiver burden: β = 0.82; 95% CI, -0.02 to 1.66; P = .09; caregiver burden→PICS: β = 0.00; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03; P = .95). There was significant covariance between PICS and caregiver burden at each time point.

Conclusions and relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of ICU survivors and their caregivers, patient PICS and caregiver burden were associated at concurrent time points but were not associated with each other longitudinally.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01211522.

重症监护综合征和照顾者负担:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
重要性:了解重症监护后综合征(PICS)和护理人员负担之间的相互关系对于危重疾病后患者和护理人员的最佳护理至关重要。目的:探讨重症监护后患者功能障碍与护理人员负担的关系。设计、环境和参与者:MIND-USA研究是一项多中心随机临床试验,招募了来自美国16个学术医疗中心(2011年12月至2017年8月)的重症监护病房(ICU)患者,其中包括148对患者-护理者。患者为18岁以上ICU谵妄患者,随机接受氟哌啶醇、齐拉西酮或安慰剂治疗。在登记时确定了一名为患者提供无偿援助的护理人员。在随机分组后3个月和12个月评估PICS和照顾者负担。统计分析时间为2023年3月至2024年4月。主要结果和测量方法:分别使用卡茨日常生活活动量表、功能活动问卷、认知状态电话访谈和创伤后应激障碍量表对ICU幸存者的PICS领域进行评估,包括身体和认知功能以及创伤后应激障碍。采用Zarit负担访谈法评估照顾者负担。使用结构方程模型检验患者PICS与护理人员负担在3个月和12个月之间的关系。结果:本研究纳入148例患者,中位(IQR)年龄为58(48-65)岁,大多数为男性(79例[53.4%]),黑人16例(10.8%),非西班牙裔139例(93.9%),白人127例(85.8%)。3个月随访时的PICS和照顾者负担与12个月随访时的这些结果呈正相关(PICS: β = 0.69;95% CI, 0.50 ~ 0.88;结论和相关性:在这项针对ICU幸存者及其护理人员的随机临床试验的二级分析中,患者PICS和护理人员负担在并发时间点相关,但在纵向上不相关。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01211522。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信