Deep learning analysis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained benign breast biopsies to predict future invasive breast cancer.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Monjoy Saha, Mustapha Abubakar, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Thomas E Rohan, Máire A Duggan, Kathryn Richert-Boe, Jonas S Almeida, Gretchen L Gierach
{"title":"Deep learning analysis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained benign breast biopsies to predict future invasive breast cancer.","authors":"Monjoy Saha, Mustapha Abubakar, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Thomas E Rohan, Máire A Duggan, Kathryn Richert-Boe, Jonas S Almeida, Gretchen L Gierach","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benign breast disease (BBD) is an important risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development. In this study, we analyzed hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (WSIs) from diagnostic BBD biopsies using different deep learning (DL) approaches to predict those who subsequently developed breast cancer (cases) and those who did not (controls).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly divided cases and controls from a nested case-control study of 946 women with BBD into training (331 cases, 331 controls) and test (142 cases, 142 controls) sets. We employed customized VGG-16 and AutoML models for image-only classification using WSIs; logistic regression for classification using only clinico-pathological characteristics; and a multimodal network combining WSIs and clinico-pathological characteristics for classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both image-only (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROCs of 0.83 (standard error, SE: 0.001) and 0.78 (SE: 0.001) for customized VGG-16 and AutoML, respectively)) and multimodal (AUROC of 0.89 (SE: 0.03)) networks had high discriminatory accuracy for BC. The clinico-pathological characteristics only model had the lowest AUROC of 0.54 (SE: 0.03). Additionally, compared to the customized VGG-16 which performed better than AutoML, the multimodal network had improved accuracy, 0.89 (SE: 0.03) vs 0.83 (SE: 0.02), sensitivity, 0.93 (SE: 0.04) vs 0.83 (SE: 0.003), and specificity, namely 0.86 (SE: 0.03) vs 0.84 (SE: 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study opens promising avenues for BC risk assessment in women with benign breast disease. Integrating whole slide images and clinico-pathological characteristics through a multimodal approach significantly improved predictive model performance. Future research will explore DL techniques to understand BBD progression to invasive BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benign breast disease (BBD) is an important risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development. In this study, we analyzed hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (WSIs) from diagnostic BBD biopsies using different deep learning (DL) approaches to predict those who subsequently developed breast cancer (cases) and those who did not (controls).

Methods: We randomly divided cases and controls from a nested case-control study of 946 women with BBD into training (331 cases, 331 controls) and test (142 cases, 142 controls) sets. We employed customized VGG-16 and AutoML models for image-only classification using WSIs; logistic regression for classification using only clinico-pathological characteristics; and a multimodal network combining WSIs and clinico-pathological characteristics for classification.

Results: Both image-only (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROCs of 0.83 (standard error, SE: 0.001) and 0.78 (SE: 0.001) for customized VGG-16 and AutoML, respectively)) and multimodal (AUROC of 0.89 (SE: 0.03)) networks had high discriminatory accuracy for BC. The clinico-pathological characteristics only model had the lowest AUROC of 0.54 (SE: 0.03). Additionally, compared to the customized VGG-16 which performed better than AutoML, the multimodal network had improved accuracy, 0.89 (SE: 0.03) vs 0.83 (SE: 0.02), sensitivity, 0.93 (SE: 0.04) vs 0.83 (SE: 0.003), and specificity, namely 0.86 (SE: 0.03) vs 0.84 (SE: 0.003).

Conclusion: This study opens promising avenues for BC risk assessment in women with benign breast disease. Integrating whole slide images and clinico-pathological characteristics through a multimodal approach significantly improved predictive model performance. Future research will explore DL techniques to understand BBD progression to invasive BC.

苏木精和伊红染色良性乳腺活检的深度学习分析预测未来浸润性乳腺癌。
背景:乳腺良性疾病(BBD)是乳腺癌(BC)发展的重要危险因素。在这项研究中,我们使用不同的深度学习(DL)方法分析了诊断性BBD活检中苏木精和伊红染色的全切片图像(WSIs),以预测随后发展为乳腺癌的患者(病例)和未发展为乳腺癌的患者(对照组)。方法:我们将946例女性BBD病例和对照组随机分为训练组(331例,331例对照)和测试组(142例,142例对照)。我们使用定制的VGG-16和AutoML模型使用wsi进行图像分类;仅使用临床病理特征进行逻辑回归分类;以及结合wsi和临床病理特征进行分类的多模式网络。结果:单图像网络(定制VGG-16和AutoML的接收者工作特征曲线下面积,AUROC分别为0.83(标准误差,SE: 0.001)和0.78 (SE: 0.001))和多模式网络(AUROC为0.89 (SE: 0.03))对BC具有较高的鉴别准确率。仅临床病理特征模型的AUROC最低,为0.54 (SE: 0.03)。此外,与表现优于AutoML的定制VGG-16相比,多模态网络的准确率为0.89 (SE: 0.03) vs 0.83 (SE: 0.02),灵敏度为0.93 (SE: 0.04) vs 0.83 (SE: 0.003),特异性为0.86 (SE: 0.03) vs 0.84 (SE: 0.003)。结论:本研究为良性乳腺疾病女性乳腺癌风险评估开辟了有希望的途径。通过多模态方法整合整个幻灯片图像和临床病理特征显著提高了预测模型的性能。未来的研究将探索DL技术来了解BBD向浸润性BC的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信