Role of Aortic Root Motion in Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Yu Zhu, Binghuan Li, Chloe Armour, Selene Pirola, Yousuf Salmasi, Thanos Athanasiou, Declan P O'Regan, Xiao Yun Xu
{"title":"Role of Aortic Root Motion in Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.","authors":"Yu Zhu, Binghuan Li, Chloe Armour, Selene Pirola, Yousuf Salmasi, Thanos Athanasiou, Declan P O'Regan, Xiao Yun Xu","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2025.3558436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Computational modelling of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAA) typically assumes zerodisplacement at the model's inlet. In this study we incorporated different types of aortic root motion into fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models representing an ATAA and a healthy aorta to examine their impacts on wall stress and wall shear stress (WSS) predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five types of boundary conditions were specified at the inlet of the solid domain: (a) zerodisplacement constraints, (b) longitudinal displacement, (c) inplane displacement, (d) combined longitudinal and in-plane displacement, and (e) rotation. The aortic walls were prestressed and modelled as anisotropic hyperelastic materials. A transitional turbulence model was employed to simulate the non-Newtonian blood flow, together with patient-specific boundary conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combined longitudinal and in-plane displacement at the aortic root increased regions with elevated maximum principal stress (MPS > 250 kPa) by 331% for the healthy aorta, and 57.1% for the ATAA model. Peak wall stress showed modest increases by 11.4% and 14% in the ATAA model and healthy aorta, respectively. Combined longitudinal and in-plane displacement increased the area of extremely high WSS regions (> 20 Pa) by 20.5% in the ATAA model, primarily in the ascending aorta. For the healthy aorta, rotation had the most notable impact on WSS, reducing the area of elevated WSS regions (> 7 Pa) by 18.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight the importance of incorporating aortic root motion into FSI models for more accurate prediction of aortic wall stress and WSS. This would enhance patient-specific risk stratification for patients with ATAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2025.3558436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Computational modelling of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAA) typically assumes zerodisplacement at the model's inlet. In this study we incorporated different types of aortic root motion into fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models representing an ATAA and a healthy aorta to examine their impacts on wall stress and wall shear stress (WSS) predictions.

Methods: Five types of boundary conditions were specified at the inlet of the solid domain: (a) zerodisplacement constraints, (b) longitudinal displacement, (c) inplane displacement, (d) combined longitudinal and in-plane displacement, and (e) rotation. The aortic walls were prestressed and modelled as anisotropic hyperelastic materials. A transitional turbulence model was employed to simulate the non-Newtonian blood flow, together with patient-specific boundary conditions.

Results: Combined longitudinal and in-plane displacement at the aortic root increased regions with elevated maximum principal stress (MPS > 250 kPa) by 331% for the healthy aorta, and 57.1% for the ATAA model. Peak wall stress showed modest increases by 11.4% and 14% in the ATAA model and healthy aorta, respectively. Combined longitudinal and in-plane displacement increased the area of extremely high WSS regions (> 20 Pa) by 20.5% in the ATAA model, primarily in the ascending aorta. For the healthy aorta, rotation had the most notable impact on WSS, reducing the area of elevated WSS regions (> 7 Pa) by 18.8%.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of incorporating aortic root motion into FSI models for more accurate prediction of aortic wall stress and WSS. This would enhance patient-specific risk stratification for patients with ATAA.

主动脉根部运动在胸升主动脉瘤流固耦合模拟中的作用。
目的:胸升主动脉瘤(ATAA)的计算模型通常假设模型入口为零位移。在这项研究中,我们将不同类型的主动脉根部运动纳入代表ATAA和健康主动脉的流固相互作用(FSI)模型,以研究它们对壁应力和壁剪切应力(WSS)预测的影响。方法:在实体域入口指定五种边界条件:(a)零位移约束,(b)纵向位移,(c)面内位移,(d)纵向和面内结合位移,(e)旋转。采用各向异性超弹性材料对主动脉壁进行预应力建模。采用过渡湍流模型来模拟非牛顿血流,并考虑患者特定的边界条件。结果:主动脉根部纵向和平面内联合位移增加了最大主应力(MPS > 250kpa)升高区域,健康主动脉增加了331%,ATAA模型增加了57.1%。在ATAA模型和健康主动脉中,峰值壁应力分别适度增加11.4%和14%。在ATAA模型中,纵向和平面内联合位移使极高WSS区(bbb20 Pa)面积增加了20.5%,主要是在升主动脉。对于健康主动脉,旋转对WSS的影响最为显著,WSS升高区面积(bb70 Pa)减少了18.8%。结论:我们的研究结果强调了将主动脉根部运动纳入FSI模型对于更准确地预测主动脉壁应力和WSS的重要性。这将增强ATAA患者的患者特异性风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信