Blind docking methods have been inappropriately used in most network pharmacology analysis.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1566772
Xinhao Che, Lei Zhang
{"title":"Blind docking methods have been inappropriately used in most network pharmacology analysis.","authors":"Xinhao Che, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1566772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Network pharmacology methods have bridged the gap between traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theory and contemporary pharmacological research and have been widely used in the study of multi-component, multi-target mechanisms of action of TCM. Molecular docking <i>in silico</i> is typically used after network analysis to validate the binding between protein targets and active components of TCM. However, unreasonable docking methods, especially the abuse of blind docking, have raised doubts about the docking results. This paper expresses concern about the above phenomenon based on a comprehensive assessment of the accuracy of the blind docking methods and calls for the correct use of docking methods to make the results of network analysis and experiments more convincing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1566772"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1566772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network pharmacology methods have bridged the gap between traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theory and contemporary pharmacological research and have been widely used in the study of multi-component, multi-target mechanisms of action of TCM. Molecular docking in silico is typically used after network analysis to validate the binding between protein targets and active components of TCM. However, unreasonable docking methods, especially the abuse of blind docking, have raised doubts about the docking results. This paper expresses concern about the above phenomenon based on a comprehensive assessment of the accuracy of the blind docking methods and calls for the correct use of docking methods to make the results of network analysis and experiments more convincing.

在大多数网络药理分析中,盲对接方法被不恰当地使用。
网络药理学方法弥补了中医理论与当代药理学研究的差距,广泛应用于中药多组分、多靶点作用机制的研究。网络分析后,通常采用分子硅对接来验证中药蛋白靶点与活性成分之间的结合。然而,不合理的对接方式,特别是盲目对接的滥用,使对接效果受到质疑。本文在综合评价盲对接方法准确性的基础上,对上述现象表示关注,呼吁正确使用盲对接方法,使网络分析和实验结果更具说服力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信