Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome treatment options eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron: analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michael B Andrews, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome treatment options eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron: analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.","authors":"Michael B Andrews, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2490841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse events (AEs) suspected to be associated with the three FDA approved medications (eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron) for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) were examined.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed all reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from each medication's date of FDA approval through 30 June 2024. Reports were excluded if they contained other suspected medications or had a reason for use outside of IBS and/or diarrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eluxadoline was associated with 1,002 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (<i>n</i> = 257, 17.0%) and uniquely pancreatitis (<i>n</i> = 174, 11.5%) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (<i>n</i> = 39, 2.6%). Rifaximin was associated with 652 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (<i>n</i> = 64, 7.6%) and uniquely <i>C.difficile</i> and bacterial overgrowth (<i>n</i> = 3, 0.4% each). Alosetron was associated with 3,832AEs, most commonly constipation (<i>n</i> = 2,007, 23.1%) and uniquely colitis (<i>n</i> = 235,2.7%), ischemic colitis (<i>n</i> = 140, 1.6%), obstruction (<i>n</i> = 110, 1.3%), and perforation (<i>n</i> = 26, 0.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis of the FAERS database showed frequent reports of abdominal pain, constipation, and nausea/vomiting related to the three FDA approved medications for IBS-D. Each raised concerns for distinct and serious AEs including pancreatitis (eluxadoline), <i>C.difficile</i> infection (rifaximin), ischemic colitis (alosetron), and intestinal obstruction/perforation (alosetron).</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2490841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse events (AEs) suspected to be associated with the three FDA approved medications (eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron) for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) were examined.

Research design and methods: We analyzed all reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from each medication's date of FDA approval through 30 June 2024. Reports were excluded if they contained other suspected medications or had a reason for use outside of IBS and/or diarrhea.

Results: Eluxadoline was associated with 1,002 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (n = 257, 17.0%) and uniquely pancreatitis (n = 174, 11.5%) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (n = 39, 2.6%). Rifaximin was associated with 652 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (n = 64, 7.6%) and uniquely C.difficile and bacterial overgrowth (n = 3, 0.4% each). Alosetron was associated with 3,832AEs, most commonly constipation (n = 2,007, 23.1%) and uniquely colitis (n = 235,2.7%), ischemic colitis (n = 140, 1.6%), obstruction (n = 110, 1.3%), and perforation (n = 26, 0.3%).

Conclusions: Our analysis of the FAERS database showed frequent reports of abdominal pain, constipation, and nausea/vomiting related to the three FDA approved medications for IBS-D. Each raised concerns for distinct and serious AEs including pancreatitis (eluxadoline), C.difficile infection (rifaximin), ischemic colitis (alosetron), and intestinal obstruction/perforation (alosetron).

腹泻为主的肠易激综合征治疗选择依洛沙多林、利福昔明和阿洛司琼:FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的分析。
背景:对三种FDA批准的治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)的药物(艾路沙多林、利福昔明和阿洛司琼)疑似相关的不良事件(ae)进行了研究。研究设计和方法:我们分析了FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中从每种药物FDA批准日期到2024年6月30日的所有报告。如果报告中含有其他可疑药物或有使用肠易激综合征和/或腹泻以外的原因,则排除。结果:艾路沙多林与1002例ae相关,最常见的是腹痛(n = 257, 17.0%),唯一的是胰腺炎(n = 174, 11.5%)和Oddi括约肌功能障碍(n = 39, 2.6%)。利福昔明与652例ae相关,最常见的是腹痛(n = 64, 7.6%),唯一的是难辨梭菌和细菌过度生长(n = 3,各0.4%)。阿洛司琼与3832例ae相关,最常见的是便秘(n = 2007, 23.1%),唯一的是结肠炎(n = 235,2.7%)、缺血性结肠炎(n = 140, 1.6%)、梗阻(n = 110, 1.3%)和穿孔(n = 26, 0.3%)。结论:我们对FAERS数据库的分析显示,与FDA批准的三种IBS-D药物相关的腹痛、便秘和恶心/呕吐的频繁报告。每一个都引起了对不同的严重不良事件的关注,包括胰腺炎(依洛沙多林)、艰难梭菌感染(利福昔明)、缺血性结肠炎(阿洛司琼)和肠梗阻/穿孔(阿洛司琼)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信