Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome treatment options eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron: analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michael B Andrews, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome treatment options eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron: analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.","authors":"Michael B Andrews, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2490841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse events (AEs) suspected to be associated with the three FDA approved medications (eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron) for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) were examined.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed all reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from each medication's date of FDA approval through 30 June 2024. Reports were excluded if they contained other suspected medications or had a reason for use outside of IBS and/or diarrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eluxadoline was associated with 1,002 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (<i>n</i> = 257, 17.0%) and uniquely pancreatitis (<i>n</i> = 174, 11.5%) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (<i>n</i> = 39, 2.6%). Rifaximin was associated with 652 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (<i>n</i> = 64, 7.6%) and uniquely <i>C.difficile</i> and bacterial overgrowth (<i>n</i> = 3, 0.4% each). Alosetron was associated with 3,832AEs, most commonly constipation (<i>n</i> = 2,007, 23.1%) and uniquely colitis (<i>n</i> = 235,2.7%), ischemic colitis (<i>n</i> = 140, 1.6%), obstruction (<i>n</i> = 110, 1.3%), and perforation (<i>n</i> = 26, 0.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis of the FAERS database showed frequent reports of abdominal pain, constipation, and nausea/vomiting related to the three FDA approved medications for IBS-D. Each raised concerns for distinct and serious AEs including pancreatitis (eluxadoline), <i>C.difficile</i> infection (rifaximin), ischemic colitis (alosetron), and intestinal obstruction/perforation (alosetron).</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2490841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse events (AEs) suspected to be associated with the three FDA approved medications (eluxadoline, rifaximin, and alosetron) for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) were examined.

Research design and methods: We analyzed all reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from each medication's date of FDA approval through 30 June 2024. Reports were excluded if they contained other suspected medications or had a reason for use outside of IBS and/or diarrhea.

Results: Eluxadoline was associated with 1,002 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (n = 257, 17.0%) and uniquely pancreatitis (n = 174, 11.5%) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (n = 39, 2.6%). Rifaximin was associated with 652 AEs, most commonly abdominal pain (n = 64, 7.6%) and uniquely C.difficile and bacterial overgrowth (n = 3, 0.4% each). Alosetron was associated with 3,832AEs, most commonly constipation (n = 2,007, 23.1%) and uniquely colitis (n = 235,2.7%), ischemic colitis (n = 140, 1.6%), obstruction (n = 110, 1.3%), and perforation (n = 26, 0.3%).

Conclusions: Our analysis of the FAERS database showed frequent reports of abdominal pain, constipation, and nausea/vomiting related to the three FDA approved medications for IBS-D. Each raised concerns for distinct and serious AEs including pancreatitis (eluxadoline), C.difficile infection (rifaximin), ischemic colitis (alosetron), and intestinal obstruction/perforation (alosetron).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信