Patients with AML and an IDH2-R172 Mutation Exhibit a Unique Initial Response to Intensive Chemotherapy Induction.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Meira Yisraeli Salman, Alexander R Terry, Andriy Derkach, David Nemirovsky, Kuo-Kai Chin, Yannis K Valtis, Leora Boussi, Theresa Spivey, Wenbin Xiao, Christopher A Famulare, Jenna R Ciervo, Jacob M Rowe, Martin S Tallman, Eytan M Stein
{"title":"Patients with AML and an IDH2-R172 Mutation Exhibit a Unique Initial Response to Intensive Chemotherapy Induction.","authors":"Meira Yisraeli Salman, Alexander R Terry, Andriy Derkach, David Nemirovsky, Kuo-Kai Chin, Yannis K Valtis, Leora Boussi, Theresa Spivey, Wenbin Xiao, Christopher A Famulare, Jenna R Ciervo, Jacob M Rowe, Martin S Tallman, Eytan M Stein","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utility of a mid-cycle bone marrow biopsy (BMB) for early assessment of response in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after intensive chemotherapy (IC) induction is contested. Even when challenged, there is little consideration as to the possibility of different response dynamics among genetically defined subgroups. Clinical observations led to the hypothesis that patients with AML and mutations in IDH2-R172 (R172-m) exhibit particularly slow blast reduction following IC induction. The purpose of this study was to analyze response kinetics of patients with R172-m to IC and compare the dynamics to patients with AML and IDH2-R140 mutations (R140-m). A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted among patients with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutated AML who received IC induction. Dynamics of blast reduction were compared and correlated with outcomes. 52 patients were identified; 33 with R140-m and 19 with R172-m. Patients with R172-m had significantly higher mid-cycle BMB median blast count (70% versus 5%, p<0.001), and their BMBs were slightly more cellular (p=0.045). Among the R140-m, 58% had ≤5% blasts versus 0 of the R172-m. Furthermore, it took significantly longer for patients with R172-m to achieve blast clearance (≤5% blasts in BMB) compared to those with R140-m (p=0.017). However, there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups, and outcomes were similar and favorable. This type of slow blast reduction has only previously been described in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. These findings suggest judicial application of re-induction strategies in this subgroup and warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015324","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utility of a mid-cycle bone marrow biopsy (BMB) for early assessment of response in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after intensive chemotherapy (IC) induction is contested. Even when challenged, there is little consideration as to the possibility of different response dynamics among genetically defined subgroups. Clinical observations led to the hypothesis that patients with AML and mutations in IDH2-R172 (R172-m) exhibit particularly slow blast reduction following IC induction. The purpose of this study was to analyze response kinetics of patients with R172-m to IC and compare the dynamics to patients with AML and IDH2-R140 mutations (R140-m). A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted among patients with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutated AML who received IC induction. Dynamics of blast reduction were compared and correlated with outcomes. 52 patients were identified; 33 with R140-m and 19 with R172-m. Patients with R172-m had significantly higher mid-cycle BMB median blast count (70% versus 5%, p<0.001), and their BMBs were slightly more cellular (p=0.045). Among the R140-m, 58% had ≤5% blasts versus 0 of the R172-m. Furthermore, it took significantly longer for patients with R172-m to achieve blast clearance (≤5% blasts in BMB) compared to those with R140-m (p=0.017). However, there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups, and outcomes were similar and favorable. This type of slow blast reduction has only previously been described in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. These findings suggest judicial application of re-induction strategies in this subgroup and warrant further investigation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信