{"title":"Impact of all-oral bedaquiline-based shorter regimens in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ginenus Fekadu, Tadesse Tolossa, Firomsa Bekele, Xiaohan Chen, Yan He, Jing Yu, Xinyao Yi, Ming Liu, Getahun Fetensa, Dinka Dugassa, Ebisa Turi, Tesfaye Regassa Feyissa, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Lianping Yang, Shanquan Chen, Wai-Kit Ming","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) presents a significant global obstacle to TB control efforts, necessitating improved intervention strategies. The introduction of potent drugs, such as bedaquiline (Bdq), has led to the development of shorter treatment regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of these regimens, synthesising data from recent clinical trials and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases, including Medline and Scopus, for studies published from 2012 to February 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies involving adults diagnosed with DR-TB treated with Bdq-based all-oral regimens lasting up to 12 months. Primary outcomes were treatment success rate (TSR) and incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). We also compared efficacy and safety with longer oral or injectable regimens in control groups. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool event rates and risk ratios (RRs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 12 studies involving 1902 DR-TB patients across 11 countries were analysed. The pooled TSR was 83% (95% CI 77% to 89%), with mortality, treatment failure and loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates of 5% (3-8), 4% (2-6) and 4% (2-6), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in TSR by DR-TB type or HIV status. The incidence rate of SAE was 19% (13-24), with prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) in 5% (2-8) of cases. Compared with the control regimens, all-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens significantly improved treatment success (RR 1.22, 1.04-1.43) but reduced mortality (RR 0.73, 0.69-0.99), treatment failure (RR 0.33, 0.32-0.62) and QTc prolongation (RR 0.39, 0.21-0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens have improved treatment outcomes and significantly advanced DR-TB management. We urge policymakers, clinicians and stakeholders to expand access to and expedite the implementation of these regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) presents a significant global obstacle to TB control efforts, necessitating improved intervention strategies. The introduction of potent drugs, such as bedaquiline (Bdq), has led to the development of shorter treatment regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of these regimens, synthesising data from recent clinical trials and observational studies.
Methods: We searched multiple databases, including Medline and Scopus, for studies published from 2012 to February 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies involving adults diagnosed with DR-TB treated with Bdq-based all-oral regimens lasting up to 12 months. Primary outcomes were treatment success rate (TSR) and incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). We also compared efficacy and safety with longer oral or injectable regimens in control groups. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool event rates and risk ratios (RRs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.
Results: Data from 12 studies involving 1902 DR-TB patients across 11 countries were analysed. The pooled TSR was 83% (95% CI 77% to 89%), with mortality, treatment failure and loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates of 5% (3-8), 4% (2-6) and 4% (2-6), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in TSR by DR-TB type or HIV status. The incidence rate of SAE was 19% (13-24), with prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) in 5% (2-8) of cases. Compared with the control regimens, all-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens significantly improved treatment success (RR 1.22, 1.04-1.43) but reduced mortality (RR 0.73, 0.69-0.99), treatment failure (RR 0.33, 0.32-0.62) and QTc prolongation (RR 0.39, 0.21-0.73).
Conclusions: All-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens have improved treatment outcomes and significantly advanced DR-TB management. We urge policymakers, clinicians and stakeholders to expand access to and expedite the implementation of these regimens.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.