Impact of all-oral bedaquiline-based shorter regimens in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ginenus Fekadu, Tadesse Tolossa, Firomsa Bekele, Xiaohan Chen, Yan He, Jing Yu, Xinyao Yi, Ming Liu, Getahun Fetensa, Dinka Dugassa, Ebisa Turi, Tesfaye Regassa Feyissa, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Lianping Yang, Shanquan Chen, Wai-Kit Ming
{"title":"Impact of all-oral bedaquiline-based shorter regimens in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ginenus Fekadu, Tadesse Tolossa, Firomsa Bekele, Xiaohan Chen, Yan He, Jing Yu, Xinyao Yi, Ming Liu, Getahun Fetensa, Dinka Dugassa, Ebisa Turi, Tesfaye Regassa Feyissa, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Lianping Yang, Shanquan Chen, Wai-Kit Ming","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) presents a significant global obstacle to TB control efforts, necessitating improved intervention strategies. The introduction of potent drugs, such as bedaquiline (Bdq), has led to the development of shorter treatment regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of these regimens, synthesising data from recent clinical trials and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases, including Medline and Scopus, for studies published from 2012 to February 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies involving adults diagnosed with DR-TB treated with Bdq-based all-oral regimens lasting up to 12 months. Primary outcomes were treatment success rate (TSR) and incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). We also compared efficacy and safety with longer oral or injectable regimens in control groups. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool event rates and risk ratios (RRs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 12 studies involving 1902 DR-TB patients across 11 countries were analysed. The pooled TSR was 83% (95% CI 77% to 89%), with mortality, treatment failure and loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates of 5% (3-8), 4% (2-6) and 4% (2-6), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in TSR by DR-TB type or HIV status. The incidence rate of SAE was 19% (13-24), with prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) in 5% (2-8) of cases. Compared with the control regimens, all-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens significantly improved treatment success (RR 1.22, 1.04-1.43) but reduced mortality (RR 0.73, 0.69-0.99), treatment failure (RR 0.33, 0.32-0.62) and QTc prolongation (RR 0.39, 0.21-0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens have improved treatment outcomes and significantly advanced DR-TB management. We urge policymakers, clinicians and stakeholders to expand access to and expedite the implementation of these regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) presents a significant global obstacle to TB control efforts, necessitating improved intervention strategies. The introduction of potent drugs, such as bedaquiline (Bdq), has led to the development of shorter treatment regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of these regimens, synthesising data from recent clinical trials and observational studies.

Methods: We searched multiple databases, including Medline and Scopus, for studies published from 2012 to February 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies involving adults diagnosed with DR-TB treated with Bdq-based all-oral regimens lasting up to 12 months. Primary outcomes were treatment success rate (TSR) and incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). We also compared efficacy and safety with longer oral or injectable regimens in control groups. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool event rates and risk ratios (RRs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results: Data from 12 studies involving 1902 DR-TB patients across 11 countries were analysed. The pooled TSR was 83% (95% CI 77% to 89%), with mortality, treatment failure and loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates of 5% (3-8), 4% (2-6) and 4% (2-6), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in TSR by DR-TB type or HIV status. The incidence rate of SAE was 19% (13-24), with prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) in 5% (2-8) of cases. Compared with the control regimens, all-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens significantly improved treatment success (RR 1.22, 1.04-1.43) but reduced mortality (RR 0.73, 0.69-0.99), treatment failure (RR 0.33, 0.32-0.62) and QTc prolongation (RR 0.39, 0.21-0.73).

Conclusions: All-oral Bdq-based shorter regimens have improved treatment outcomes and significantly advanced DR-TB management. We urge policymakers, clinicians and stakeholders to expand access to and expedite the implementation of these regimens.

以贝达喹啉为基础的全口服短期方案对耐药结核病治疗的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:耐药结核病(DR-TB)是结核病控制工作的重大全球障碍,需要改进干预策略。强效药物,如贝达喹啉(Bdq)的引入,导致了较短治疗方案的发展。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合近期临床试验和观察性研究的数据,检查这些方案的影响。方法:检索Medline和Scopus等多个数据库,检索2012年至2024年2月发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括临床试验和队列研究,涉及被诊断患有耐药结核病的成年人,接受基于bdq的全口服方案治疗,持续时间长达12个月。主要结局为治疗成功率(TSR)和严重不良事件(SAEs)发生率。我们还比较了对照组较长时间口服或注射方案的有效性和安全性。荟萃分析汇总事件发生率和风险比(rr)。进行亚组分析和meta回归以确定潜在的异质性来源。结果:分析了来自11个国家的涉及1902名耐药结核病患者的12项研究的数据。合并TSR为83% (95% CI为77% - 89%),死亡率、治疗失败和随访损失(LTFU)率分别为5%(3-8)、4%(2-6)和4%(2-6)。亚组分析显示,耐药结核类型或HIV状态对TSR的影响没有显著差异。SAE发生率为19%(13-24),校正QT间期(QTc)延长5%(2-8)。与对照方案相比,全口服bdq较短方案显著提高了治疗成功率(RR 1.22, 1.04-1.43),但降低了死亡率(RR 0.73, 0.69-0.99)、治疗失败(RR 0.33, 0.32-0.62)和QTc延长(RR 0.39, 0.21-0.73)。结论:以bdq为基础的全口服短期方案改善了治疗效果,并显著改善了耐药结核病的管理。我们敦促决策者、临床医生和利益攸关方扩大这些方案的可及性并加快实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信