Nan Dai, Changqing Guo, Shanshan Zhu, Saif Ullah, Jingwen Zhang, Ping Liu, Fangbin Zhang, Xinguang Cao
{"title":"Long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique: a new choice for gastrointestinal defect closure.","authors":"Nan Dai, Changqing Guo, Shanshan Zhu, Saif Ullah, Jingwen Zhang, Ping Liu, Fangbin Zhang, Xinguang Cao","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03717-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the novel long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique in closing gastrointestinal defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric submucosal tumors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into the Long Transparent Cap-Assisted Clip Closure group (LTCCC group) and the Purse-String Suture group (PSS group) based on the method of wound closure after ER. Primary outcomes included closure success rates and closure time, and secondary outcomes covered postoperative hospital stays, occurrence of adverse events, tumor characteristics, and follow-up status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The closure success rate was 100% in both groups. The closure time in the LTC group was shorter than that in the PSS group (17.44 ± 7.71 min vs. 28.81 ± 9.20 min, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stays and adverse event rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Good wound healing was observed during follow-up. No residual lesions, tumor recurrence, metastasis, gastrointestinal fistulae, or sinuses were found during a median follow-up of 32 (5 ~ 73) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique is a simple, safe, and effective method for closing gastrointestinal defects, and can be considered as a treatment option for endoscopic closure of such defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03717-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the novel long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique in closing gastrointestinal defects.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric submucosal tumors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into the Long Transparent Cap-Assisted Clip Closure group (LTCCC group) and the Purse-String Suture group (PSS group) based on the method of wound closure after ER. Primary outcomes included closure success rates and closure time, and secondary outcomes covered postoperative hospital stays, occurrence of adverse events, tumor characteristics, and follow-up status.
Results: The closure success rate was 100% in both groups. The closure time in the LTC group was shorter than that in the PSS group (17.44 ± 7.71 min vs. 28.81 ± 9.20 min, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stays and adverse event rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Good wound healing was observed during follow-up. No residual lesions, tumor recurrence, metastasis, gastrointestinal fistulae, or sinuses were found during a median follow-up of 32 (5 ~ 73) months.
Conclusion: The long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique is a simple, safe, and effective method for closing gastrointestinal defects, and can be considered as a treatment option for endoscopic closure of such defects.
目的:评价新型长透明帽辅助夹片缝合技术在胃肠道缺损修补中的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年11月在郑州大学第一附属医院行胃粘膜下肿瘤内镜切除术患者的临床资料。根据ER后伤口闭合方式将患者分为长透明帽辅助夹闭合组(LTCCC组)和荷包缝合组(PSS组)。主要结局包括闭合成功率和闭合时间,次要结局包括术后住院时间、不良事件发生、肿瘤特征和随访状态。结果:两组缝合成功率均为100%。LTC组的关闭时间较PSS组短(17.44±7.71 min vs 28.81±9.20 min, P < 0.05)。随访中观察到伤口愈合良好。中位随访32个月(5 ~ 73个月),未发现残留病灶、肿瘤复发、转移、胃肠道瘘或鼻窦。结论:长透明帽辅助夹封闭技术是一种简单、安全、有效的胃肠道缺损封闭方法,可作为内镜下消化道缺损封闭的治疗选择。
期刊介绍:
BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.