Three types of ligamentum flavum resections for the treatment of lumbar central canal stenosis: BUTTERFLY retrospective study.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ariel Kaen, Santiago Rocha Romero, María Jesús Correa Romero, Fernando Durand, Ignacio Martin
{"title":"Three types of ligamentum flavum resections for the treatment of lumbar central canal stenosis: BUTTERFLY retrospective study.","authors":"Ariel Kaen, Santiago Rocha Romero, María Jesús Correa Romero, Fernando Durand, Ignacio Martin","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a prospective study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical results of three surgical techniques for the resection of the hypertrophic ligamentum flavum in patients with lumbar stenosis.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition. Biportal endoscopic surgery is a modern technique that has gained popularity in recent years. Although various techniques have been proposed for resecting the ligament, no studies have identified the most superior method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled patients with severe lumbar canal stenosis who underwent biportal endoscopic \"Z\" technique decompression between 2021 and 2023. Patients with any clinical or radiological signs of spondylolisthesis were excluded. The resection of the ligamentum flavum was classified into piecemeal resection, one-piece \"butterfly\" resection, and the novel variant \"two-wings\" or two-piece resection. Several demographic and clinical statistical variables were collected, with a specific focus on surgical time, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety lumbar decompression surgeries were performed on 70 patients. The patients were divided into the butterfly group (en bloc) with 27 levels, \"two-wings\" group with 35 levels, and \"piecemeal\" group with 28 levels. No significant differences in demographics or clinical variables were found among the three groups. However, piecemeal resection was associated with a higher incidence of dural tears and a longer surgical time (p<0.05). In contrast, en bloc resection, particularly in the two-wing group, demonstrated the best surgical times without an increase in complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results revealed that removing the ligamentum flavum en bloc (either in two pieces or one) may reduce the surgical time and incidence of dural tears. Randomized and prospective studies are warranted to establish definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective study.

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical results of three surgical techniques for the resection of the hypertrophic ligamentum flavum in patients with lumbar stenosis.

Overview of literature: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition. Biportal endoscopic surgery is a modern technique that has gained popularity in recent years. Although various techniques have been proposed for resecting the ligament, no studies have identified the most superior method.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients with severe lumbar canal stenosis who underwent biportal endoscopic "Z" technique decompression between 2021 and 2023. Patients with any clinical or radiological signs of spondylolisthesis were excluded. The resection of the ligamentum flavum was classified into piecemeal resection, one-piece "butterfly" resection, and the novel variant "two-wings" or two-piece resection. Several demographic and clinical statistical variables were collected, with a specific focus on surgical time, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes.

Results: Ninety lumbar decompression surgeries were performed on 70 patients. The patients were divided into the butterfly group (en bloc) with 27 levels, "two-wings" group with 35 levels, and "piecemeal" group with 28 levels. No significant differences in demographics or clinical variables were found among the three groups. However, piecemeal resection was associated with a higher incidence of dural tears and a longer surgical time (p<0.05). In contrast, en bloc resection, particularly in the two-wing group, demonstrated the best surgical times without an increase in complication rates.

Conclusions: The results revealed that removing the ligamentum flavum en bloc (either in two pieces or one) may reduce the surgical time and incidence of dural tears. Randomized and prospective studies are warranted to establish definitive conclusions.

三种黄韧带切除术治疗腰椎中央管狭窄:BUTTERFLY回顾性研究。
研究设计:前瞻性研究的回顾性分析。目的:本研究旨在评价和比较三种手术方式切除腰椎管狭窄症肥厚性黄韧带的临床效果。文献综述:腰椎管狭窄症是一种常见的退行性疾病。双门静脉内窥镜手术是近年来越来越流行的一项现代技术。虽然已经提出了各种切除韧带的技术,但没有研究确定最优越的方法。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2021年至2023年间接受双门静脉内窥镜“Z”技术减压的严重腰椎管狭窄患者。排除有任何脊椎滑脱临床或放射学征象的患者。黄韧带的切除分为片状切除、一件式“蝴蝶”切除和新型的“两翼”或两件式切除。收集了一些人口统计学和临床统计变量,特别关注手术时间、术后并发症和临床结果。结果:70例患者共行腰椎减压手术90例。患者分为蝴蝶组(整体组)27个水平,“两翼”组(35个水平)和“碎片”组(28个水平)。三组患者在人口统计学和临床变量方面均无显著差异。然而,部分切除与硬脊膜撕裂发生率较高和手术时间较长相关(结论:结果显示,整体切除黄韧带(两段或一段)可减少手术时间和硬脊膜撕裂发生率。随机和前瞻性研究有必要建立明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信