Visual coronary artery calcification score to predict significant coronary artery stenosis in patients presenting with cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Maxence Brunel, Brahim Harbaoui, Laurent Bitker, Carole Chambonnet, Matthieu Aubry, Loïc Boussel, Cyril Besnard, Jean-Christophe Richard, Pierre Lantelme, Pierre-Yves Courand
{"title":"Visual coronary artery calcification score to predict significant coronary artery stenosis in patients presenting with cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.","authors":"Maxence Brunel, Brahim Harbaoui, Laurent Bitker, Carole Chambonnet, Matthieu Aubry, Loïc Boussel, Cyril Besnard, Jean-Christophe Richard, Pierre Lantelme, Pierre-Yves Courand","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01423-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency coronary angiogram after a cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is still a matter of debate. To better select patients who may benefit from this procedure, we tested a visual coronary artery calcification (VCAC) score available in chest CT to predict significant coronary artery stenosis and/or culprit lesion or ad hoc or delayed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 113 patients with cardiac arrest and without STEMI who had a coronary angiogram and chest CT (January 2013 to March 2023, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France) were retrospectively included. VCAC was scored from 0 (no calcification) to 3 (diffuse calcification) for each 4 four main arteries (left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary artery). At baseline the median [interquartile range] age was 65.8 years [53.4-75.7], 61.9% were male, and 59.3% presented with ventricular fibrillation. Coronary angiogram identified at least one significant coronary artery stenosis in 32.7%, and ad hoc and delayed PCI were performed in 12.4% and 6.2% of the patients, respectively. VCAC score was an excellent predictor of significant coronary artery stenosis with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95%CI [0.90-1.00]) and the optimal threshold was ≥ 4 (specificity 94.7%, sensitivity 91.9%). For the detection of culprit coronary artery stenosis, the AUC was at 0.90 (95%CI [0.85-0.96]) and the optimal threshold was ≥ 5 (specificity 83.5%, sensitivity 87.5%). The AUC was 0.886 [0.823-0.948] (specificity 81.8%, sensitivity 85.7%) for ad hoc PCI and 0.921 [0.872-0.972] (specificity 85.3%, sensitivity 88.9%) for both delayed and ad hoc PCI with a same optimal threshold of VCAC ≥ 5. A VCAC score ≥ 4 had a sensitivity at 100% to predict a significant or culprit coronary artery stenosis and ad hoc or delayed PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study found that a non-dedicated CT thorax may be useful to measure VCAC and if this is scored ≥ 4 it allows physicians to better select patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest with non-STEMI and without history of coronary artery disease who may benefit from an emergency coronary angiogram to detect a significant or culprit coronary artery stenosis and had PCI if appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01423-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency coronary angiogram after a cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is still a matter of debate. To better select patients who may benefit from this procedure, we tested a visual coronary artery calcification (VCAC) score available in chest CT to predict significant coronary artery stenosis and/or culprit lesion or ad hoc or delayed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Results: A total of 113 patients with cardiac arrest and without STEMI who had a coronary angiogram and chest CT (January 2013 to March 2023, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France) were retrospectively included. VCAC was scored from 0 (no calcification) to 3 (diffuse calcification) for each 4 four main arteries (left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary artery). At baseline the median [interquartile range] age was 65.8 years [53.4-75.7], 61.9% were male, and 59.3% presented with ventricular fibrillation. Coronary angiogram identified at least one significant coronary artery stenosis in 32.7%, and ad hoc and delayed PCI were performed in 12.4% and 6.2% of the patients, respectively. VCAC score was an excellent predictor of significant coronary artery stenosis with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95%CI [0.90-1.00]) and the optimal threshold was ≥ 4 (specificity 94.7%, sensitivity 91.9%). For the detection of culprit coronary artery stenosis, the AUC was at 0.90 (95%CI [0.85-0.96]) and the optimal threshold was ≥ 5 (specificity 83.5%, sensitivity 87.5%). The AUC was 0.886 [0.823-0.948] (specificity 81.8%, sensitivity 85.7%) for ad hoc PCI and 0.921 [0.872-0.972] (specificity 85.3%, sensitivity 88.9%) for both delayed and ad hoc PCI with a same optimal threshold of VCAC ≥ 5. A VCAC score ≥ 4 had a sensitivity at 100% to predict a significant or culprit coronary artery stenosis and ad hoc or delayed PCI.

Conclusions: The present study found that a non-dedicated CT thorax may be useful to measure VCAC and if this is scored ≥ 4 it allows physicians to better select patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest with non-STEMI and without history of coronary artery disease who may benefit from an emergency coronary angiogram to detect a significant or culprit coronary artery stenosis and had PCI if appropriate.

视觉冠状动脉钙化评分预测无st段抬高型心肌梗死的心脏骤停患者显著冠状动脉狭窄。
背景:无 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (STEMI) 的心脏骤停后进行紧急冠状动脉造影仍存在争议。为了更好地选择可能从该手术中获益的患者,我们测试了胸部 CT 中的可视冠状动脉钙化(VCAC)评分,以预测明显的冠状动脉狭窄和/或罪魁祸首病变或临时或延迟的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI):回顾性纳入了113例心脏骤停且无STEMI的患者,这些患者均接受过冠状动脉造影和胸部CT检查(2013年1月至2023年3月,法国里昂Croix-Rousse医院)。四条主要动脉(左主动脉、左前降支动脉、环状动脉和右冠状动脉)的VCAC评分从0分(无钙化)到3分(弥漫性钙化)不等。基线年龄的中位数[四分位数间距]为65.8岁[53.4-75.7],61.9%为男性,59.3%伴有心室颤动。32.7%的患者通过冠状动脉造影发现至少一支冠状动脉明显狭窄,12.4%和6.2%的患者分别进行了临时和延迟PCI治疗。VCAC 评分能很好地预测明显的冠状动脉狭窄,其 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.95(95%CI [0.90-1.00]),最佳阈值为≥4(特异性 94.7%,敏感性 91.9%)。检测冠状动脉狭窄的AUC为0.90(95%CI [0.85-0.96]),最佳阈值为≥5(特异性83.5%,敏感性87.5%)。临时 PCI 的 AUC 为 0.886 [0.823-0.948](特异性 81.8%,敏感性 85.7%),延迟和临时 PCI 的 AUC 均为 0.921 [0.872-0.972](特异性 85.3%,敏感性 88.9%),最佳阈值同样为 VCAC ≥ 5。VCAC评分≥4对预测明显或罪魁祸首冠状动脉狭窄、临时或延迟PCI的敏感性为100%:本研究发现,非专用胸部CT可用于测量VCAC,如果VCAC评分≥4分,医生就能更好地选择从心脏骤停、非STEMI和无冠状动脉疾病史的患者中复苏,这些患者可能会受益于急诊冠状动脉造影,以检测明显或罪魁祸首冠状动脉狭窄,并在适当的情况下进行PCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信