Suneesh Chembiparambil Anand MD , Gabriela Narowska MD , Chethan Gangireddy MD, MPH, MBA , John Enevoldsen , Martin Gerard Keane MD , Daniel Edmundowicz MD, MBA , Paul Robert Forfia MD , Anjali Vaidya MD
{"title":"Novel automated electronic medical record-based VEST (virtual echocardiography screening tool) algorithm for pulmonary arterial hypertension","authors":"Suneesh Chembiparambil Anand MD , Gabriela Narowska MD , Chethan Gangireddy MD, MPH, MBA , John Enevoldsen , Martin Gerard Keane MD , Daniel Edmundowicz MD, MBA , Paul Robert Forfia MD , Anjali Vaidya MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains underrecognized and life-threatening due to limited awareness, nonspecific symptoms, and late referral to accredited pulmonary hypertension (PH) centers. The previously validated virtual echocardiography screening tool (VEST) predicts PAH hemodynamics. The objectives of the present study were to determine if the novel automated electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm could accurately calculate VEST scores to identify PAH hemodynamics and aid referral to PH specialty care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study is a retrospective analysis of 4,952 patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) with tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) ≥2.9 m/s in a hospital with an accredited PH Center of Comprehensive Care. Using the automated EMR-based algorithm, EMR-calculated VEST scores were calculated and compared to manually calculated VEST scores. Automated EMR VEST scores were used to identify those with highest risk for PAH (+3 score). Patients with +3 score were analyzed to determine whether they were evaluated within the accredited PH center or undergone right heart catheterization (RHC), the gold standard for PH diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Automated EMR VEST scores were validated with 100% correlation to 60 manual scores. Of 354 patients with +3 score, those that underwent RHC had severe PH, with mean pulmonary artery pressure 48 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance 8.5 Wood units. One hundred and four patients (29.4%) were never referred for specialty PH care, and of these, only 37.5% underwent RHC. In the 250 patients referred to subspecialty PH care, 237 (94.8%) underwent RHC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This novel EMR-based automated VEST calculator is a powerful yet simple scoring tool that can capture patients at high risk for PAH, prompting earlier diagnosis and referrals to accredited PH centers to allow for earlier expert care and implementation of medical therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"287 ","pages":"Pages 24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325001024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains underrecognized and life-threatening due to limited awareness, nonspecific symptoms, and late referral to accredited pulmonary hypertension (PH) centers. The previously validated virtual echocardiography screening tool (VEST) predicts PAH hemodynamics. The objectives of the present study were to determine if the novel automated electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm could accurately calculate VEST scores to identify PAH hemodynamics and aid referral to PH specialty care.
Methods
This study is a retrospective analysis of 4,952 patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) with tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) ≥2.9 m/s in a hospital with an accredited PH Center of Comprehensive Care. Using the automated EMR-based algorithm, EMR-calculated VEST scores were calculated and compared to manually calculated VEST scores. Automated EMR VEST scores were used to identify those with highest risk for PAH (+3 score). Patients with +3 score were analyzed to determine whether they were evaluated within the accredited PH center or undergone right heart catheterization (RHC), the gold standard for PH diagnosis.
Results
Automated EMR VEST scores were validated with 100% correlation to 60 manual scores. Of 354 patients with +3 score, those that underwent RHC had severe PH, with mean pulmonary artery pressure 48 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance 8.5 Wood units. One hundred and four patients (29.4%) were never referred for specialty PH care, and of these, only 37.5% underwent RHC. In the 250 patients referred to subspecialty PH care, 237 (94.8%) underwent RHC.
Conclusions
This novel EMR-based automated VEST calculator is a powerful yet simple scoring tool that can capture patients at high risk for PAH, prompting earlier diagnosis and referrals to accredited PH centers to allow for earlier expert care and implementation of medical therapies.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.