NGS-MRD negativity in post-HSCT ALL spares unnecessary therapeutic interventions triggered by borderline qPCR results without an increase in relapse risk
Krystof Seferna, Michael Svaton, Andrea Rennerova, Aneta Skotnicova, Leona Reznickova, Tatana Valova, Petr Sedlacek, Petr Riha, Renata Formankova, Petra Keslova, Lucie Sramkova, Jan Stary, Jan Zuna, Alexandra Kolenova, Cyril Salek, Jan Trka, Eva Fronkova
{"title":"NGS-MRD negativity in post-HSCT ALL spares unnecessary therapeutic interventions triggered by borderline qPCR results without an increase in relapse risk","authors":"Krystof Seferna, Michael Svaton, Andrea Rennerova, Aneta Skotnicova, Leona Reznickova, Tatana Valova, Petr Sedlacek, Petr Riha, Renata Formankova, Petra Keslova, Lucie Sramkova, Jan Stary, Jan Zuna, Alexandra Kolenova, Cyril Salek, Jan Trka, Eva Fronkova","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is vital for timely therapeutic intervention planning. However, interpreting low-positive results from the current standard method, quantitative PCR (qPCR) of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements (IG/TR), poses challenges due to the risk of false positivity caused by non-specific amplification. We aimed to improve MRD detection specificity using the next-generation amplicon sequencing (NGS) of IG/TR rearrangements for better relapse prediction. In pediatric and young adult ALL patients undergoing sequential post-HSCT MRD monitoring, we prospectively re-tested positive non-quantifiable qPCR results with NGS-MRD using the EuroClonality-NGS approach. We were able to confirm 13 out of 47 (27.7%) qPCR positive results using the more specific NGS-MRD method. Out of 10 patients with at least one MRD positivity confirmed by NGS, six relapsed (60%) 1–3.7 months after testing. Among 25 patients with all NGS-MRD results negative, two relapses occurred (8%) after 5.1 and 12.1 months. One-year RFS was 40% versus 96% and 3-year OS was 33.3% versus 94.4% for the NGS-positive and NGS-negative groups, respectively. The difference was not attributable to a varying rate of therapeutic interventions. Six patients out of 14 who had immunosuppressive treatment tapered or received donor lymphocyte infusion in response to MRD positivity developed significant graft versus host disease, leading to one fatality. This underscores the importance of enhancing the post-HSCT relapse risk prediction accuracy through NGS-MRD testing to avoid unnecessary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.70124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is vital for timely therapeutic intervention planning. However, interpreting low-positive results from the current standard method, quantitative PCR (qPCR) of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements (IG/TR), poses challenges due to the risk of false positivity caused by non-specific amplification. We aimed to improve MRD detection specificity using the next-generation amplicon sequencing (NGS) of IG/TR rearrangements for better relapse prediction. In pediatric and young adult ALL patients undergoing sequential post-HSCT MRD monitoring, we prospectively re-tested positive non-quantifiable qPCR results with NGS-MRD using the EuroClonality-NGS approach. We were able to confirm 13 out of 47 (27.7%) qPCR positive results using the more specific NGS-MRD method. Out of 10 patients with at least one MRD positivity confirmed by NGS, six relapsed (60%) 1–3.7 months after testing. Among 25 patients with all NGS-MRD results negative, two relapses occurred (8%) after 5.1 and 12.1 months. One-year RFS was 40% versus 96% and 3-year OS was 33.3% versus 94.4% for the NGS-positive and NGS-negative groups, respectively. The difference was not attributable to a varying rate of therapeutic interventions. Six patients out of 14 who had immunosuppressive treatment tapered or received donor lymphocyte infusion in response to MRD positivity developed significant graft versus host disease, leading to one fatality. This underscores the importance of enhancing the post-HSCT relapse risk prediction accuracy through NGS-MRD testing to avoid unnecessary interventions.
期刊介绍:
HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology.
In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care.
Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.