Formalization in Health Care: The Role of Hybrid Professionals

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Per Christian Ahlgren, Idun Garmo Mo, Kari Nyland
{"title":"Formalization in Health Care: The Role of Hybrid Professionals","authors":"Per Christian Ahlgren,&nbsp;Idun Garmo Mo,&nbsp;Kari Nyland","doi":"10.1111/faam.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article explores the introduction of a new formalized management control system (MCS) in a Norwegian municipal emergency care unit where formal control had previously been limited. We seek to understand how and why the formalized MCS came to be perceived as enabling by organizational members. In the process of formalization key, individuals emerge, as hybrid professionals, engaging in specific choices and actions in the design, implementation, and use of the formal MCS, founded in their efforts to balance the complexities of multiple logics. A key contribution is how hybrid professionals, through their practices of hybridization, become important mediators of the outcome of formalization. Beyond the design characteristics of MCS, the question of whether the system is perceived as enabling or coercive is, also, dependent upon the efforts of key individuals in balancing the complexity of multiple logics. Moreover, we observe how hybrids at different levels of the organization mutually engage in enabling hybrid practices throughout the process of formalization that appears critical for the outcome, suggesting that practices of hybridization in formalization are a collective endeavor rather than exclusively individual.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47120,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accountability & Management","volume":"41 2","pages":"274-292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accountability & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faam.12414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the introduction of a new formalized management control system (MCS) in a Norwegian municipal emergency care unit where formal control had previously been limited. We seek to understand how and why the formalized MCS came to be perceived as enabling by organizational members. In the process of formalization key, individuals emerge, as hybrid professionals, engaging in specific choices and actions in the design, implementation, and use of the formal MCS, founded in their efforts to balance the complexities of multiple logics. A key contribution is how hybrid professionals, through their practices of hybridization, become important mediators of the outcome of formalization. Beyond the design characteristics of MCS, the question of whether the system is perceived as enabling or coercive is, also, dependent upon the efforts of key individuals in balancing the complexity of multiple logics. Moreover, we observe how hybrids at different levels of the organization mutually engage in enabling hybrid practices throughout the process of formalization that appears critical for the outcome, suggesting that practices of hybridization in formalization are a collective endeavor rather than exclusively individual.

医疗保健的正规化:混合专业人员的作用
本文探讨了一种新的正式管理控制系统(MCS)的引入,在挪威市政急救单位,正式控制以前是有限的。我们试图理解组织成员如何以及为什么认为正规化的管理体系是有能力的。在正规化关键的过程中,个人作为混合专业人员出现,参与设计、实现和使用正式MCS的具体选择和行动,努力平衡多种逻辑的复杂性。一个关键的贡献是,混合专业人员如何通过他们的混合实践,成为形式化结果的重要调解人。除了MCS的设计特点之外,系统是否被认为是授权或强制的问题也取决于关键个人在平衡多重逻辑复杂性方面的努力。此外,我们观察到,在整个形式化过程中,组织不同层次的混合如何相互参与,使混合实践成为可能,这对结果至关重要,这表明形式化中的混合实践是集体的努力,而不是单独的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信