Beyond decomposition: Hierarchical dependency management in multi-document question answering

IF 2.8 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Xiaoyan Zheng, Zhi Li, Qianglong Chen, Yin Zhang
{"title":"Beyond decomposition: Hierarchical dependency management in multi-document question answering","authors":"Xiaoyan Zheng,&nbsp;Zhi Li,&nbsp;Qianglong Chen,&nbsp;Yin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/asi.24971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to handle multi-document question answering (MDQA) tasks, it is beneficial to decompose complex queries into multiple simpler ones to enhance retrieval results. However, previous strategies always employ a one-shot approach of question decomposition, overlooking subquestions dependency problem and failing to ensure that the derived subqueries are single-hop. To overcome this challenge, we introduce a novel framework called DSRC-QCS. Decompose-solve-renewal-cycle (DSRC) is an iterative multi-hop question processing module. The key idea of DSRC involves using a unique symbol to achieve hierarchical dependency management and employing a cyclical process of question decomposition, solving, and renewal to continuously generate and resolve all single-hop subquestions. Query-chain selector (QCS) functions as a voting mechanism that effectively utilizes the reasoning process of DSRC to assess and select solutions. We compare DSRC-QCS against five RAG approaches across three datasets and three LLMs. DSRC-QCS demonstrates superior performance. Compared to the Direct Retrieval method, DSRC-QCS improves the average F1 score by 17.36% with Alpaca-7b, 10.83% with LLaMa2-Chat-7b, and 11.88% with GPT-3.5-Turbo. We also conduct ablation studies to validate the performance of both DSRC and QCS and explore factors influencing the effectiveness of DSRC. We have included all prompts in the Appendix.</p>","PeriodicalId":48810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"76 5","pages":"770-789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to handle multi-document question answering (MDQA) tasks, it is beneficial to decompose complex queries into multiple simpler ones to enhance retrieval results. However, previous strategies always employ a one-shot approach of question decomposition, overlooking subquestions dependency problem and failing to ensure that the derived subqueries are single-hop. To overcome this challenge, we introduce a novel framework called DSRC-QCS. Decompose-solve-renewal-cycle (DSRC) is an iterative multi-hop question processing module. The key idea of DSRC involves using a unique symbol to achieve hierarchical dependency management and employing a cyclical process of question decomposition, solving, and renewal to continuously generate and resolve all single-hop subquestions. Query-chain selector (QCS) functions as a voting mechanism that effectively utilizes the reasoning process of DSRC to assess and select solutions. We compare DSRC-QCS against five RAG approaches across three datasets and three LLMs. DSRC-QCS demonstrates superior performance. Compared to the Direct Retrieval method, DSRC-QCS improves the average F1 score by 17.36% with Alpaca-7b, 10.83% with LLaMa2-Chat-7b, and 11.88% with GPT-3.5-Turbo. We also conduct ablation studies to validate the performance of both DSRC and QCS and explore factors influencing the effectiveness of DSRC. We have included all prompts in the Appendix.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) is a leading international forum for peer-reviewed research in information science. For more than half a century, JASIST has provided intellectual leadership by publishing original research that focuses on the production, discovery, recording, storage, representation, retrieval, presentation, manipulation, dissemination, use, and evaluation of information and on the tools and techniques associated with these processes. The Journal welcomes rigorous work of an empirical, experimental, ethnographic, conceptual, historical, socio-technical, policy-analytic, or critical-theoretical nature. JASIST also commissions in-depth review articles (“Advances in Information Science”) and reviews of print and other media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信